Clients' Perceptions of Authentic Intimate Connection on Erotic Webcam Modeling Sites.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ellen M Kaufman, Amanda N Gesselman, Margaret Bennett-Brown
{"title":"Clients' Perceptions of Authentic Intimate Connection on Erotic Webcam Modeling Sites.","authors":"Ellen M Kaufman, Amanda N Gesselman, Margaret Bennett-Brown","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2389211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While early uses of technology in the sex industry centered on increasing accessibility to pornography or expanding advertising opportunities for direct service sex workers, the growing prevalence of personalized, platform-based sexual technologies reflects the postindustrial paradigm of sexual labor in which \"authentic\" emotional and physical connection is increasingly prioritized. In this study, we explored how erotic webcam modeling platforms (e.g. LiveJasmin) exemplify \"bounded authenticity\" by offering clients an experience of \"genuine\" intimacy that is nevertheless constrained by both its transactional nature and technological reality. We conducted a web-based survey of LiveJasmin clients (<i>N</i> = 2,047) in 2020. We assessed participants' perceptions of the authenticity of their emotional bonds with models - and the boundaries that potentially constrain these relationships - via quantitative and qualitative measures. Quantitative results revealed that 65% of participants reported having ever experienced an emotional bond with a model, with over half of participants (51.6%) reporting that they believed the models cared about their lives outside the platform. Providing nuance to these findings, qualitative results illustrated the ways in which participants' perceptions of the emotional authenticity and boundaries of these relationships varied, with participants reporting a range of experiences that extended from perceived \"real\" connections to those that feel transactional and hollow, but nevertheless shaped by the platform. Our findings ultimately underscore how camsite clients' perceptions of these relationships mirror the tension between desiring genuine feelings of emotional intimacy from the models and the market and technological constraints of these experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2389211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While early uses of technology in the sex industry centered on increasing accessibility to pornography or expanding advertising opportunities for direct service sex workers, the growing prevalence of personalized, platform-based sexual technologies reflects the postindustrial paradigm of sexual labor in which "authentic" emotional and physical connection is increasingly prioritized. In this study, we explored how erotic webcam modeling platforms (e.g. LiveJasmin) exemplify "bounded authenticity" by offering clients an experience of "genuine" intimacy that is nevertheless constrained by both its transactional nature and technological reality. We conducted a web-based survey of LiveJasmin clients (N = 2,047) in 2020. We assessed participants' perceptions of the authenticity of their emotional bonds with models - and the boundaries that potentially constrain these relationships - via quantitative and qualitative measures. Quantitative results revealed that 65% of participants reported having ever experienced an emotional bond with a model, with over half of participants (51.6%) reporting that they believed the models cared about their lives outside the platform. Providing nuance to these findings, qualitative results illustrated the ways in which participants' perceptions of the emotional authenticity and boundaries of these relationships varied, with participants reporting a range of experiences that extended from perceived "real" connections to those that feel transactional and hollow, but nevertheless shaped by the platform. Our findings ultimately underscore how camsite clients' perceptions of these relationships mirror the tension between desiring genuine feelings of emotional intimacy from the models and the market and technological constraints of these experiences.

客户对情色网盘模特网站上真实亲密联系的看法。
技术在性产业中的早期应用主要集中在提高色情制品的可获取性或扩大直接服务性工作者的广告机会,而个性化、基于平台的性技术的日益盛行则反映了后工业时代的性劳动范式,在这种范式中,"真实 "的情感和身体联系日益受到重视。在本研究中,我们探讨了色情网络摄像头模特平台(如 LiveJasmin)如何通过为客户提供 "真实 "的亲密关系体验来体现 "受约束的真实性",而这种体验又受到其交易性质和技术现实的限制。2020 年,我们对 LiveJasmin 客户(N = 2,047 人)进行了一项网络调查。我们通过定量和定性措施,评估了参与者对其与模特之间情感纽带真实性的看法,以及可能制约这些关系的界限。定量结果显示,65% 的参与者表示曾经与模特有过情感联系,超过一半的参与者(51.6%)表示他们相信模特关心他们在平台之外的生活。定性结果表明,参与者对这些关系的情感真实性和界限的看法各不相同,参与者报告了一系列的经历,从认为是 "真实 "的联系到感觉是交易和空洞的联系,但这些都是由平台塑造的。我们的研究结果最终强调了 camsite 客户对这些关系的看法是如何反映出渴望从模特身上获得真正的情感亲密感与这些体验的市场和技术限制之间的矛盾的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信