Perspectives on advance care planning and related end-of-life care in people with heart failure: A Q methodology study.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
JinShil Kim, Yoon Young Hwang, KyungAh Cho, Myoung Hwan Shin, Mi-Seung Shin, Jisun Yang, Minjeong An, Seongkum Heo
{"title":"Perspectives on advance care planning and related end-of-life care in people with heart failure: A Q methodology study.","authors":"JinShil Kim, Yoon Young Hwang, KyungAh Cho, Myoung Hwan Shin, Mi-Seung Shin, Jisun Yang, Minjeong An, Seongkum Heo","doi":"10.1177/13591053241273618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negative perspectives around advance care planning (ACP) prevent people with heart failure (HF) from preparing their end-of-life (EOL) effectively. A Q methodology study was conducted to identify types of ACP perspectives in Koreans with HF. The Q sample (31 statements representing ACP perspectives) was constructed through an extensive literature review and in-depth qualitative interview. The P sample (individuals with HF) completed each grid with a statement on the Q sorting table. The data were analyzed using the PQ program. Individuals with HF have both different and common perspectives on ACP. Three types of perspectives were identified: \"<i>positive acceptance</i>,\" \"<i>contemplative support</i>,\" and \"<i>hesitancy in acceptance</i>.\" Common perspectives across types indicated that people with HF had positive attitudes toward ACP and emphasized their autonomy in EOL decisions. Clinicians need to consider these different and common perspectives on ACP to facilitate patients' engagement and provide relevant support.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241273618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negative perspectives around advance care planning (ACP) prevent people with heart failure (HF) from preparing their end-of-life (EOL) effectively. A Q methodology study was conducted to identify types of ACP perspectives in Koreans with HF. The Q sample (31 statements representing ACP perspectives) was constructed through an extensive literature review and in-depth qualitative interview. The P sample (individuals with HF) completed each grid with a statement on the Q sorting table. The data were analyzed using the PQ program. Individuals with HF have both different and common perspectives on ACP. Three types of perspectives were identified: "positive acceptance," "contemplative support," and "hesitancy in acceptance." Common perspectives across types indicated that people with HF had positive attitudes toward ACP and emphasized their autonomy in EOL decisions. Clinicians need to consider these different and common perspectives on ACP to facilitate patients' engagement and provide relevant support.

心力衰竭患者对预先护理计划和相关临终关怀的看法:一项 Q 方法研究。
有关预先护理计划(ACP)的消极观点阻碍了心力衰竭(HF)患者有效地准备临终关怀(EOL)。为了确定韩国心力衰竭患者的 ACP 观点类型,我们开展了一项 Q 方法研究。通过广泛的文献综述和深入的定性访谈,构建了 Q 样本(31 个代表 ACP 观点的陈述)。P 样本(高频患者)用 Q 排序表上的语句填写每个网格。数据使用 PQ 程序进行分析。高血脂患者对 ACP 既有不同的观点,也有共同的观点。我们确定了三种观点:"积极接受"、"沉思支持 "和 "接受犹豫"。不同类型的共同观点表明,高血压患者对 ACP 持积极态度,并强调他们在临终决定中的自主权。临床医生需要考虑这些关于 ACP 的不同和共同观点,以促进患者参与并提供相关支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信