Ł J Dziadek, A K Sieradzan, C Czaplewski, M Zalewski, F Banaś, M Toczek, W Nisterenko, S Grudinin, A Liwo, A Giełdoń
{"title":"Assessment of Four Theoretical Approaches to Predict Protein Flexibility in the Crystal Phase and Solution.","authors":"Ł J Dziadek, A K Sieradzan, C Czaplewski, M Zalewski, F Banaś, M Toczek, W Nisterenko, S Grudinin, A Liwo, A Giełdoń","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we evaluated the ability of four coarse-grained methods to predict protein flexible regions with potential biological importance, UNRES-flex, UNRES-DSSP-flex (based on the united residue model of polypeptide chains without and with secondary structure restraints, respectively), CABS-flex (based on the C-α, C-β, and side chain model), and nonlinear rigid block normal mode analysis (NOLB) with a set of 100 protein structures determined by NMR spectroscopy or X-ray crystallography, with all secondary structure types. End regions with high fluctuations were excluded from analysis. The Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to quantify the conformity between the calculated and experimental fluctuation profiles, the latter determined from NMR ensembles and X-ray <i>B</i>-factors, respectively. For X-ray structures (corresponding to proteins in a crowded environment), NOLB resulted in the best agreement between the predicted and experimental fluctuation profiles, while for NMR structures (corresponding to proteins in solution), the ranking of performance is CABS-flex > UNRES-DSSP-flex > UNRES-flex > NOLB; however, CABS-flex sometimes exaggerated the extent of small fluctuations, as opposed to UNRES-DSSP-flex.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00754","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we evaluated the ability of four coarse-grained methods to predict protein flexible regions with potential biological importance, UNRES-flex, UNRES-DSSP-flex (based on the united residue model of polypeptide chains without and with secondary structure restraints, respectively), CABS-flex (based on the C-α, C-β, and side chain model), and nonlinear rigid block normal mode analysis (NOLB) with a set of 100 protein structures determined by NMR spectroscopy or X-ray crystallography, with all secondary structure types. End regions with high fluctuations were excluded from analysis. The Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to quantify the conformity between the calculated and experimental fluctuation profiles, the latter determined from NMR ensembles and X-ray B-factors, respectively. For X-ray structures (corresponding to proteins in a crowded environment), NOLB resulted in the best agreement between the predicted and experimental fluctuation profiles, while for NMR structures (corresponding to proteins in solution), the ranking of performance is CABS-flex > UNRES-DSSP-flex > UNRES-flex > NOLB; however, CABS-flex sometimes exaggerated the extent of small fluctuations, as opposed to UNRES-DSSP-flex.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.