Predicting progression-free survival from measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Florencia A. Tettamanti, Holly Kimko, Shringi Sharma, Giovanni Di Veroli
{"title":"Predicting progression-free survival from measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia","authors":"Florencia A. Tettamanti,&nbsp;Holly Kimko,&nbsp;Shringi Sharma,&nbsp;Giovanni Di Veroli","doi":"10.1111/cts.13905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Association between measurable residual disease (MRD) and survival outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has often been reported. However, limited quantitative analyses over large datasets have been undertaken to establish the predictive power of MRD. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of published MRD data to explore the utility of MRD in the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS). We undertook two independent analyses, which leveraged available published data to address two complimentary questions. In the first, data from eight clinical trials was modeled via a meta-regression approach, showing that median PFS can be predicted from undetectable MRD rates at 3–6 months of post-treatment. The resulting model can be used to predict the probability of technical success of a planned clinical trial in chemotherapy. In the second, we investigated the evidence for predicting PFS from competing MRD metrics, for example baseline value and instantaneous MRD value, via a joint modeling approach. Using data from four small studies, we found strong evidence that including MRD metrics in joint models improves predictions of PFS compared with not including them. This analysis suggests that incorporating MRD is likely to better inform individual progression predictions. It is therefore proposed that systematic MRD collection should be accompanied by modeling to generate algorithms that inform patients' progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.13905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.13905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Association between measurable residual disease (MRD) and survival outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has often been reported. However, limited quantitative analyses over large datasets have been undertaken to establish the predictive power of MRD. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of published MRD data to explore the utility of MRD in the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS). We undertook two independent analyses, which leveraged available published data to address two complimentary questions. In the first, data from eight clinical trials was modeled via a meta-regression approach, showing that median PFS can be predicted from undetectable MRD rates at 3–6 months of post-treatment. The resulting model can be used to predict the probability of technical success of a planned clinical trial in chemotherapy. In the second, we investigated the evidence for predicting PFS from competing MRD metrics, for example baseline value and instantaneous MRD value, via a joint modeling approach. Using data from four small studies, we found strong evidence that including MRD metrics in joint models improves predictions of PFS compared with not including them. This analysis suggests that incorporating MRD is likely to better inform individual progression predictions. It is therefore proposed that systematic MRD collection should be accompanied by modeling to generate algorithms that inform patients' progression.

Abstract Image

从慢性淋巴细胞白血病可测量残留病预测无进展生存期
慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)中可测量的残留疾病(MRD)与生存结果之间的关系经常被报道。然而,为确定MRD的预测能力而对大型数据集进行的定量分析非常有限。在此,我们对已发表的 MRD 数据进行了全面评估,以探讨 MRD 在预测无进展生存期 (PFS) 中的作用。我们进行了两项独立分析,利用现有的已发表数据来解决两个相互补充的问题。在第一项分析中,我们通过元回归方法对来自八项临床试验的数据进行了建模,结果表明,根据治疗后 3-6 个月的未检测出 MRD 率可以预测中位无进展生存期。由此得出的模型可用于预测计划中的化疗临床试验的技术成功概率。其次,我们通过联合建模方法研究了从相互竞争的 MRD 指标(如基线值和瞬时 MRD 值)预测 PFS 的证据。通过使用四项小型研究的数据,我们发现了强有力的证据,表明在联合模型中纳入 MRD 指标与不纳入 MRD 指标相比,可改善对 PFS 的预测。这一分析表明,纳入 MRD 有可能为个体进展预测提供更好的信息。因此,我们建议在系统收集 MRD 指标的同时建立模型,以生成可预测患者病情进展的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信