Accessibility of Percutaneous Biopsy in Retrocolic-Placed Pancreatic Grafts With a Duodeno-Duodenostomy.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.12682
Clara Bassaganyas, Anna Darnell, Alexandre Soler-Perromat, Gerard Rafart, Pedro Ventura-Aguiar, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega, Carmen Ayuso, Ángeles García-Criado
{"title":"Accessibility of Percutaneous Biopsy in Retrocolic-Placed Pancreatic Grafts With a Duodeno-Duodenostomy.","authors":"Clara Bassaganyas, Anna Darnell, Alexandre Soler-Perromat, Gerard Rafart, Pedro Ventura-Aguiar, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega, Carmen Ayuso, Ángeles García-Criado","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.12682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Duodeno-duodenostomy (DD) has been proposed as a more physiological alternative to conventional duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ) for pancreas transplantation. Accessibility of percutaneous biopsies in these grafts has not yet been assessed. We conducted a retrospective study including all pancreatic percutaneous graft biopsies requested between November 2009 and July 2021. Whenever possible, biopsies were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance or computed tomography (CT) guidance when the US approach failed. Patients were classified into two groups according to surgical technique (DJ and DD). Accessibility, success for histological diagnosis and complications were compared. Biopsy was performed in 93/136 (68.4%) patients in the DJ group and 116/132 (87.9%) of the DD group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). The graft was not accessible for biopsy mainly due to intestinal loop interposition (n = 29 DJ, n = 10 DD). Adequate sample for histological diagnosis was obtained in 86/93 (92.5%) of the DJ group and 102/116 (87.9%) of the DD group (<i>p</i> = 0.2777). One minor complication was noted in the DD group. The retrocolic position of the DD pancreatic graft does not limit access to percutaneous biopsy. This is a safe technique with a high histological diagnostic success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"12682"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duodeno-duodenostomy (DD) has been proposed as a more physiological alternative to conventional duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ) for pancreas transplantation. Accessibility of percutaneous biopsies in these grafts has not yet been assessed. We conducted a retrospective study including all pancreatic percutaneous graft biopsies requested between November 2009 and July 2021. Whenever possible, biopsies were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance or computed tomography (CT) guidance when the US approach failed. Patients were classified into two groups according to surgical technique (DJ and DD). Accessibility, success for histological diagnosis and complications were compared. Biopsy was performed in 93/136 (68.4%) patients in the DJ group and 116/132 (87.9%) of the DD group (p = 0.0001). The graft was not accessible for biopsy mainly due to intestinal loop interposition (n = 29 DJ, n = 10 DD). Adequate sample for histological diagnosis was obtained in 86/93 (92.5%) of the DJ group and 102/116 (87.9%) of the DD group (p = 0.2777). One minor complication was noted in the DD group. The retrocolic position of the DD pancreatic graft does not limit access to percutaneous biopsy. This is a safe technique with a high histological diagnostic success rate.

带十二指肠造口的网结扎胰腺移植物经皮活检的可及性
十二指肠-十二指肠造口术(DD)被认为是胰腺移植手术中更符合生理学原理的一种选择,可替代传统的十二指肠-空肠造口术(DJ)。这些移植物经皮活检的可及性尚未得到评估。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括 2009 年 11 月至 2021 年 7 月期间申请的所有胰腺经皮移植物活检。在可能的情况下,活检在超声(US)引导下进行,如果 US 方法失败,则在计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下进行。根据手术技术(DJ 和 DD)将患者分为两组。比较了手术的可及性、组织学诊断的成功率和并发症。DJ组93/136(68.4%)名患者进行了活检,DD组116/132(87.9%)名患者进行了活检(P = 0.0001)。移植物无法进行活组织切片检查的主要原因是肠环插置(DJ 组 29 例,DD 组 10 例)。86/93(92.5%)的 DJ 组和 102/116(87.9%)的 DD 组获得了足够的组织学诊断样本(p = 0.2777)。DD 组出现了一个小并发症。DD胰腺移植物的后结肠位置并不限制经皮活检。这是一种安全的技术,组织学诊断成功率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信