Tracheal intubation in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway. An international Delphi study.

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s00134-024-07578-2
Kunal Karamchandani, Prashant Nasa, Mary Jarzebowski, David J Brewster, Audrey De Jong, Philippe R Bauer, Lauren Berkow, Calvin A Brown, Luca Cabrini, Jonathan Casey, Tim Cook, Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia, Laura V Duggan, Louise Ellard, Begum Ergan, Malin Jonsson Fagerlund, Jonathan Gatward, Robert Greif, Andy Higgs, Samir Jaber, David Janz, Aaron M Joffe, Boris Jung, George Kovacs, Arthur Kwizera, John G Laffey, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, J Adam Law, Stuart Marshall, Brendan A McGrath, Jarrod M Mosier, Daniel Perin, Oriol Roca, Amélie Rollé, Vincenzo Russotto, John C Sakles, Gentle S Shrestha, Nathan J Smischney, Massimiliano Sorbello, Avery Tung, Craig S Jabaley, Sheila Nainan Myatra
{"title":"Tracheal intubation in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway. An international Delphi study.","authors":"Kunal Karamchandani, Prashant Nasa, Mary Jarzebowski, David J Brewster, Audrey De Jong, Philippe R Bauer, Lauren Berkow, Calvin A Brown, Luca Cabrini, Jonathan Casey, Tim Cook, Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia, Laura V Duggan, Louise Ellard, Begum Ergan, Malin Jonsson Fagerlund, Jonathan Gatward, Robert Greif, Andy Higgs, Samir Jaber, David Janz, Aaron M Joffe, Boris Jung, George Kovacs, Arthur Kwizera, John G Laffey, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, J Adam Law, Stuart Marshall, Brendan A McGrath, Jarrod M Mosier, Daniel Perin, Oriol Roca, Amélie Rollé, Vincenzo Russotto, John C Sakles, Gentle S Shrestha, Nathan J Smischney, Massimiliano Sorbello, Avery Tung, Craig S Jabaley, Sheila Nainan Myatra","doi":"10.1007/s00134-024-07578-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to provide consensus and expert clinical practice statements related to airway management in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway (PDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international Steering Committee involving seven intensivists and one Delphi methodology expert was convened by the Society of Critical Care Anaesthesiologists (SOCCA) Physiologically Difficult Airway Task Force. The committee selected an international panel of 35 expert clinician-researchers with expertise in airway management in critically ill adults. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Delphi process included seven survey rounds. A stable consensus was achieved for 53 (87%) out of 61 statements. The experts agreed that in addition to pathophysiological conditions, physiological alterations associated with pregnancy and obesity also constitute a physiologically difficult airway. They suggested having an intubation team consisting of at least three healthcare providers including two airway operators, implementing an appropriately designed checklist, and optimizing hemodynamics prior to tracheal intubation. Similarly, the experts agreed on the head elevated laryngoscopic position, routine use of videolaryngoscopy during the first attempt, preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation, careful mask ventilation during the apneic phase, and attention to cardiorespiratory status for post-intubation care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a Delphi method, agreement among a panel of international experts was reached for 53 statements providing guidance to clinicians worldwide on safe tracheal intubation practices in patients with a physiologically difficult airway to help improve patient outcomes. Well-designed studies are needed to assess the effects of these practice statements and address the remaining uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1563-1579"},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07578-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our study aimed to provide consensus and expert clinical practice statements related to airway management in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway (PDA).

Methods: An international Steering Committee involving seven intensivists and one Delphi methodology expert was convened by the Society of Critical Care Anaesthesiologists (SOCCA) Physiologically Difficult Airway Task Force. The committee selected an international panel of 35 expert clinician-researchers with expertise in airway management in critically ill adults. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements.

Results: The Delphi process included seven survey rounds. A stable consensus was achieved for 53 (87%) out of 61 statements. The experts agreed that in addition to pathophysiological conditions, physiological alterations associated with pregnancy and obesity also constitute a physiologically difficult airway. They suggested having an intubation team consisting of at least three healthcare providers including two airway operators, implementing an appropriately designed checklist, and optimizing hemodynamics prior to tracheal intubation. Similarly, the experts agreed on the head elevated laryngoscopic position, routine use of videolaryngoscopy during the first attempt, preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation, careful mask ventilation during the apneic phase, and attention to cardiorespiratory status for post-intubation care.

Conclusion: Using a Delphi method, agreement among a panel of international experts was reached for 53 statements providing guidance to clinicians worldwide on safe tracheal intubation practices in patients with a physiologically difficult airway to help improve patient outcomes. Well-designed studies are needed to assess the effects of these practice statements and address the remaining uncertainties.

Abstract Image

生理气道困难的成人重症患者的气管插管。国际德尔菲研究。
目的:我们的研究旨在提供有关生理性困难气道(PDA)重症成人患者气道管理的共识和专家临床实践声明:重症监护麻醉医师学会(Society of Critical Care Anaesthesiologists,SOCCA)生理困难气道工作组召集了一个国际指导委员会,该委员会由七名重症监护医师和一名德尔菲法专家组成。委员会挑选了 35 位在成人重症患者气道管理方面具有专长的临床研究专家组成国际小组。委员会采用了基于迭代法的德尔菲过程,以获得最终的共识声明:德尔菲过程包括七轮调查。在 61 项声明中,有 53 项(87%)达成了稳定的共识。专家们一致认为,除病理生理条件外,与妊娠和肥胖相关的生理改变也会造成生理性气道困难。他们建议成立一个由至少三名医护人员(包括两名气道操作员)组成的插管团队,实施一份设计合理的核对表,并在气管插管前优化血液动力学。同样,专家们还就头部抬高的喉镜位置、首次尝试时常规使用视频喉镜、使用无创通气进行预吸氧、在呼吸暂停阶段仔细进行面罩通气以及在插管后护理中注意心肺功能状态等问题达成了一致意见:通过德尔菲法,国际专家小组就 53 项声明达成了一致意见,这些声明为全球临床医生在生理性气道困难患者中进行安全气管插管操作提供了指导,有助于改善患者预后。需要进行精心设计的研究,以评估这些实践声明的效果,并解决剩余的不确定性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信