Péter Révész, Eszter Kopjár, Zsolt Szakács, Vilmos Warta, Alexandra Csongor, Imre Gerlinger, István Szanyi
{"title":"Comparing the Quality of Life and Hearing Thresholds Following Stapedectomy Versus Laser Stapedotomy with NiTiBOND Piston.","authors":"Péter Révész, Eszter Kopjár, Zsolt Szakács, Vilmos Warta, Alexandra Csongor, Imre Gerlinger, István Szanyi","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.231337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the quality of life (QoL) and hearing thresholds of patients who underwent 2 types of stapes surgery. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing stapedotomy with NiTiBOND prostheses (n=20) and stapedectomy with autogenous cortical bone columella (n=20), applying the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults outcome measures with hearing thresholds. Univariate comparative statistical methods were applied. The stapedotomy cohort had significantly better values of Social Support Score of the GBI as compared to the stapedectomy cohort (P=.016). No statistically significant difference was detected between the groups in the pre- and postoperative audiological results and the further QoL measures. Apart from the excellent postoperative audiological results of the different types of stapes surgeries, stapedotomy with NiTiBOND prostheses seems to be superior as regards QoL over stapedectomy applying autogenous cortical bone columella.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 2","pages":"142-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.231337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the quality of life (QoL) and hearing thresholds of patients who underwent 2 types of stapes surgery. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing stapedotomy with NiTiBOND prostheses (n=20) and stapedectomy with autogenous cortical bone columella (n=20), applying the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults outcome measures with hearing thresholds. Univariate comparative statistical methods were applied. The stapedotomy cohort had significantly better values of Social Support Score of the GBI as compared to the stapedectomy cohort (P=.016). No statistically significant difference was detected between the groups in the pre- and postoperative audiological results and the further QoL measures. Apart from the excellent postoperative audiological results of the different types of stapes surgeries, stapedotomy with NiTiBOND prostheses seems to be superior as regards QoL over stapedectomy applying autogenous cortical bone columella.
本研究旨在考察接受两种镫骨手术的患者的生活质量(QoL)和听阈。该研究采用格拉斯哥效益量表(GBI)和成人听力障碍量表(Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults)与听力阈值进行结果测量,比较了使用NiTiBOND假体的镫骨切除术(20例)和使用自体皮质骨骨膜的镫骨切除术(20例),并进行了回顾性队列研究。采用单变量比较统计方法。与镫骨切除术队列相比,镫骨切除术队列的 GBI 社会支持评分值明显更高(P=.016)。两组患者术前和术后的听力结果以及其他 QoL 测量结果在统计学上无明显差异。除了不同类型的镫骨手术在术后听力方面的优异结果外,使用NiTiBOND假体的镫骨切除术在QoL方面似乎优于使用自体皮质骨骨柱的镫骨切除术。