'Humans think outside the pixels' - Radiologists' perceptions of using artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography screening in a clinical setting.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Emma Engström
{"title":"'Humans think outside the pixels' - Radiologists' perceptions of using artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography screening in a clinical setting.","authors":"Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Emma Engström","doi":"10.1177/14604582241275020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore radiologists' views on using an artificial intelligence (AI) tool named ScreenTrustCAD with Philips equipment) as a diagnostic decision support tool in mammography screening during a clinical trial at Capio Sankt Göran Hospital, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven breast imaging radiologists, evaluated using inductive thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three main thematic categories: AI in society, reflecting views on AI's contribution to the healthcare system; AI-human interactions, addressing the radiologists' self-perceptions when using the AI and its potential challenges to their profession; and AI as a tool among others. The radiologists were generally positive towards AI, and they felt comfortable handling its sometimes-ambiguous outputs and erroneous evaluations. While they did not feel that it would undermine their profession, they preferred using it as a complementary reader rather than an independent one.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggested that breast radiology could become a launch pad for AI in healthcare. We recommend that this exploratory work on subjective perceptions be complemented by quantitative assessments to generalize the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 3","pages":"14604582241275020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241275020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore radiologists' views on using an artificial intelligence (AI) tool named ScreenTrustCAD with Philips equipment) as a diagnostic decision support tool in mammography screening during a clinical trial at Capio Sankt Göran Hospital, Sweden.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with seven breast imaging radiologists, evaluated using inductive thematic content analysis.

Results: We identified three main thematic categories: AI in society, reflecting views on AI's contribution to the healthcare system; AI-human interactions, addressing the radiologists' self-perceptions when using the AI and its potential challenges to their profession; and AI as a tool among others. The radiologists were generally positive towards AI, and they felt comfortable handling its sometimes-ambiguous outputs and erroneous evaluations. While they did not feel that it would undermine their profession, they preferred using it as a complementary reader rather than an independent one.

Conclusion: The results suggested that breast radiology could become a launch pad for AI in healthcare. We recommend that this exploratory work on subjective perceptions be complemented by quantitative assessments to generalize the findings.

人类的思维不局限于像素"--放射科医生对在临床乳房 X 射线摄影筛查中使用人工智能检测乳腺癌的看法。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨放射科医生对在瑞典 Capio Sankt Göran 医院的临床试验中使用名为 ScreenTrustCAD 的人工智能(AI)工具(与飞利浦设备配合使用)作为乳腺 X 光筛查诊断决策支持工具的看法:我们对七位乳腺成像放射科医生进行了半结构式访谈,并使用归纳式主题内容分析法进行了评估:结果:我们确定了三大主题类别:社会中的人工智能,反映了人工智能对医疗系统的贡献;人工智能与人类的互动,涉及放射科医生在使用人工智能时的自我认知以及人工智能对其职业的潜在挑战;以及人工智能作为一种工具。放射科医生普遍对人工智能持积极态度,他们对人工智能有时模棱两可的输出和错误的评估感到得心应手。虽然他们不认为人工智能会削弱他们的专业,但他们更愿意将其作为辅助读片器,而不是独立的读片器:研究结果表明,乳腺放射学可以成为医疗领域人工智能的起点。我们建议,在对主观看法进行探索的同时,还应进行定量评估,以推广研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信