Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block and Liquid-Based Cytology for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Tumors.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ali Şenkaya, Ferit Çelik, Deniz Nart, Nevin Oruç, Aydın Ahmet, Fatih Tekin, İlker Turan
{"title":"Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block and Liquid-Based Cytology for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Tumors.","authors":"Ali Şenkaya, Ferit Çelik, Deniz Nart, Nevin Oruç, Aydın Ahmet, Fatih Tekin, İlker Turan","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2024.23609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of cell block (CB) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic tumors. The study included patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic tumors between January 2015 and February 2021 and whose cytology samples were both processed for LBC and CB. Data of 390 patients (220 men, mean age: 64.2 ± 11.4 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Of the detected lesions (size: 17-120 mm; mean: 39.9 ± 13.9 mm), 220 (56.4%) were located in the head and uncinate process of the pancreas. Lesions in 339 (86.9%) patients were diagnosed as malignant using CB and/or LBC and suspicious for malignancy in 44 (11.3%) patients. In 7 patients with non-diagnostic (6 cases) or negative for malignancy (1 case) EUS-FNA results using both methods, the diagnosis of malignancy was established via ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy. Malignancy was detected in 324 (92.4%), 313 (87.9%), and 298 (87.9%) patients using CB, LBC, and both CB and LBC, respectively. Final diagnosis was obtained in 339 (98%) patients by using CB and/or LBC. The combined use of the both methods exhibited significantly superior diagnostic accuracy compared with CB and LBC alone (P < .001). Liquid-based cytology and CB exhibit high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic tumors in patients undergoing EUS-FNA. The combined use of both methods showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than LBC and CB alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":51205,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2024.23609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of cell block (CB) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic tumors. The study included patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic tumors between January 2015 and February 2021 and whose cytology samples were both processed for LBC and CB. Data of 390 patients (220 men, mean age: 64.2 ± 11.4 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Of the detected lesions (size: 17-120 mm; mean: 39.9 ± 13.9 mm), 220 (56.4%) were located in the head and uncinate process of the pancreas. Lesions in 339 (86.9%) patients were diagnosed as malignant using CB and/or LBC and suspicious for malignancy in 44 (11.3%) patients. In 7 patients with non-diagnostic (6 cases) or negative for malignancy (1 case) EUS-FNA results using both methods, the diagnosis of malignancy was established via ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy. Malignancy was detected in 324 (92.4%), 313 (87.9%), and 298 (87.9%) patients using CB, LBC, and both CB and LBC, respectively. Final diagnosis was obtained in 339 (98%) patients by using CB and/or LBC. The combined use of the both methods exhibited significantly superior diagnostic accuracy compared with CB and LBC alone (P < .001). Liquid-based cytology and CB exhibit high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic tumors in patients undergoing EUS-FNA. The combined use of both methods showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than LBC and CB alone.

内镜超声引导下胰腺肿瘤细针抽吸术的细胞阻滞和液基细胞学诊断效果。
本研究旨在评估胰腺肿瘤内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)中细胞块(CB)和液基细胞学(LBC)的诊断效果。该研究纳入了2015年1月至2021年2月期间因胰腺肿瘤接受EUS-FNA检查的患者,他们的细胞学样本都经过了LBC和CB处理。研究人员对390名患者(220名男性,平均年龄(64.2 ± 11.4)岁)的数据进行了回顾性分析。在检出的病变(大小:17-120 毫米;平均:39.9 ± 13.9 毫米)中,220 例(56.4%)位于胰头和胰腺钩突。339例(86.9%)患者的病变被CB和/或LBC诊断为恶性,44例(11.3%)患者的病变被怀疑为恶性。7例患者的EUS-FNA结果为两种方法均无法诊断(6例)或恶性肿瘤阴性(1例),通过超声引导下经皮活检确定了恶性肿瘤诊断。使用 CB、LBC 以及 CB 和 LBC 检测出恶性肿瘤的患者分别为 324 例(92.4%)、313 例(87.9%)和 298 例(87.9%)。339(98%)名患者通过 CB 和/或 LBC 获得最终诊断。与单独使用 CB 和 LBC 相比,联合使用这两种方法的诊断准确率明显更高(P < .001)。液基细胞学和 CB 对 EUS-FNA 患者胰腺肿瘤的检测具有很高的诊断准确性。联合使用这两种方法的诊断准确率明显高于单独使用液基细胞学和液基细胞学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology (Turk J Gastroenterol) is the double-blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of the Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is a bimonthly publication, published on January, March, May, July, September, November and its publication language is English. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology aims to publish international at the highest clinical and scientific level on original issues of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports and letters to the editor on clinical and experimental gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信