Prospective Cohort Study Examining the Ability of Performance-Based and Self-Reported Frailty Measures to Predict 30-Day Rehospitalizations After Kidney Transplantation

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Elizabeth C. Lorenz, Byron H. Smith, Girish Mour, Hani M. Wadei, Cassie C. Kennedy, Carrie A. Schinstock, Walter K. Kremers, Andrea L. Cheville, Nathan K. LeBrasseur, Andrew D. Rule
{"title":"Prospective Cohort Study Examining the Ability of Performance-Based and Self-Reported Frailty Measures to Predict 30-Day Rehospitalizations After Kidney Transplantation","authors":"Elizabeth C. Lorenz,&nbsp;Byron H. Smith,&nbsp;Girish Mour,&nbsp;Hani M. Wadei,&nbsp;Cassie C. Kennedy,&nbsp;Carrie A. Schinstock,&nbsp;Walter K. Kremers,&nbsp;Andrea L. Cheville,&nbsp;Nathan K. LeBrasseur,&nbsp;Andrew D. Rule","doi":"10.1111/ctr.15433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Performance-based measures of frailty are associated with healthcare utilization after kidney transplantation (KT) but require in-person assessment. A promising alternative is self-reported frailty. The goal of this study was to examine the ability of performance-based and self-reported frailty measures to predict 30-day rehospitalizations after KT. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study involving 272 adults undergoing KT at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Florida, or Arizona. We simultaneously measured frailty before KT using the physical frailty phenotype (PFP), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and self-report (the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] 4-item physical function short form v2.0). Both the PFP and self-reported frailty were independently associated with more than a 2-fold greater odds of 30-day rehospitalizations, while the SPPB was not. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prognostic value of all three of the above frailty measures in patients undergoing KT. The PFP is more prognostic than the SPPB when assessing the risk of 30-day rehospitalizations; self-reported frailty can complement the PFP but not replace it. However, the 4-item survey assessing self-reported frailty represents a simple way to identify patients undergoing KT surgery who would benefit from interventions to lower the risk of rehospitalizations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performance-based measures of frailty are associated with healthcare utilization after kidney transplantation (KT) but require in-person assessment. A promising alternative is self-reported frailty. The goal of this study was to examine the ability of performance-based and self-reported frailty measures to predict 30-day rehospitalizations after KT. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study involving 272 adults undergoing KT at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Florida, or Arizona. We simultaneously measured frailty before KT using the physical frailty phenotype (PFP), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), and self-report (the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] 4-item physical function short form v2.0). Both the PFP and self-reported frailty were independently associated with more than a 2-fold greater odds of 30-day rehospitalizations, while the SPPB was not. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prognostic value of all three of the above frailty measures in patients undergoing KT. The PFP is more prognostic than the SPPB when assessing the risk of 30-day rehospitalizations; self-reported frailty can complement the PFP but not replace it. However, the 4-item survey assessing self-reported frailty represents a simple way to identify patients undergoing KT surgery who would benefit from interventions to lower the risk of rehospitalizations.

前瞻性队列研究:检验基于表现和自我报告的虚弱指标预测肾移植术后 30 天再住院的能力。
以绩效为基础的虚弱度测量与肾移植(KT)后的医疗利用率有关,但需要亲自进行评估。自我报告的虚弱程度是一种很有前途的替代方法。本研究的目的是检验基于表现的虚弱度测量和自我报告的虚弱度测量预测 KT 术后 30 天再住院的能力。我们在明尼苏达州、佛罗里达州或亚利桑那州的梅奥诊所开展了一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,共有 272 名成人接受了 KT 治疗。我们同时使用体质虚弱表型 (PFP)、短期体能测试 (SPPB) 和自我报告(患者报告结果测量信息系统 [PROMIS] 4 项体能简表 v2.0)测量了 KT 前的体质虚弱程度。PFP和自我报告的体弱与30天内再次住院的几率增加2倍以上有独立关联,而SPPB则没有。据我们所知,这是第一项对接受 KT 治疗的患者的上述三种虚弱指标的预后价值进行评估的研究。在评估 30 天再住院风险时,PFP 比 SPPB 更能预测预后;自我报告的虚弱程度可以补充 PFP,但不能取代 PFP。不过,评估自报虚弱程度的 4 项调查是识别接受 KT 手术的患者的一种简单方法,这些患者将受益于降低再住院风险的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信