Criteria for continuous neuraxial analgesia associated with reduced mortality in patients undergoing thoracotomy.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Axel Semmelmann, Wolfgang Baar, Isabelle Moneke, Torsten Loop
{"title":"Criteria for continuous neuraxial analgesia associated with reduced mortality in patients undergoing thoracotomy.","authors":"Axel Semmelmann, Wolfgang Baar, Isabelle Moneke, Torsten Loop","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Both thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral analgesia are effective techniques to control pain and minimize the stress response following thoracic surgery. We hypothesized that continuous neuraxial techniques may be associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative mortality after thoracotomy. Additionally, we aimed to identify subgroup populations that may benefit more from neuraxial anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>1620 patients who underwent open thoracotomy were included in this retrospective study from the German Thoracic Registry database at four university hospitals. All-cause inpatient mortality was determined for patients who had and did not have neuraxial anesthesia. Logistic regression was used to adjust for and explore various covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Continuous neuraxial analgesia was associated with a lower overall mortality in the postoperative period (2.9%, 23/796 vs 5.3%, 44/824, p=0.02) only after the univariate analysis but not the multivariable analysis (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.237 to 1.12, p=0.15). In patients with epidural or paravertebral catheters, mortality was significantly lower in the following subgroups: age >75 (5/113 vs 18/77, OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.67, p=0.02), American Society of Anesthesiologists Performance Score >III (11//97 vs 33/155, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.89, p=0.03), chronic kidney disease (5/83 vs 16/77, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.82, p=0.03), and postoperative sepsis (9/21 vs 17/25, OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.44, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neuraxial analgesic techniques are associated with reductions in postoperative mortality after open thoracic surgery in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Both thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral analgesia are effective techniques to control pain and minimize the stress response following thoracic surgery. We hypothesized that continuous neuraxial techniques may be associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative mortality after thoracotomy. Additionally, we aimed to identify subgroup populations that may benefit more from neuraxial anesthesia.

Method: 1620 patients who underwent open thoracotomy were included in this retrospective study from the German Thoracic Registry database at four university hospitals. All-cause inpatient mortality was determined for patients who had and did not have neuraxial anesthesia. Logistic regression was used to adjust for and explore various covariates.

Results: Continuous neuraxial analgesia was associated with a lower overall mortality in the postoperative period (2.9%, 23/796 vs 5.3%, 44/824, p=0.02) only after the univariate analysis but not the multivariable analysis (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.237 to 1.12, p=0.15). In patients with epidural or paravertebral catheters, mortality was significantly lower in the following subgroups: age >75 (5/113 vs 18/77, OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.67, p=0.02), American Society of Anesthesiologists Performance Score >III (11//97 vs 33/155, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.89, p=0.03), chronic kidney disease (5/83 vs 16/77, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.82, p=0.03), and postoperative sepsis (9/21 vs 17/25, OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.44, p<0.01).

Conclusions: Neuraxial analgesic techniques are associated with reductions in postoperative mortality after open thoracic surgery in selected patients.

与降低胸廓切开术患者死亡率相关的持续神经镇痛标准。
导言:胸腔硬膜外镇痛和胸椎旁镇痛都是控制疼痛和减少胸腔手术后应激反应的有效技术。我们假设连续神经轴技术可能与胸廓切开术后死亡率的降低有关。此外,我们还旨在确定可能从神经麻醉中获益更多的亚组人群:这项回顾性研究从四家大学医院的德国胸腔登记数据库中纳入了 1620 名接受开胸手术的患者。对进行和未进行神经麻醉的患者的全因住院死亡率进行了测定。采用逻辑回归对各种协变量进行了调整和探讨:经过单变量分析,连续神经轴镇痛与较低的术后总死亡率相关(2.9%,23/796 vs 5.3%,44/824,p=0.02),但与多变量分析无关(OR 0.49,95 % CI 0.237 to 1.12,p=0.15)。在使用硬膜外或椎旁导管的患者中,以下亚组的死亡率明显较低:年龄大于 75 岁(5/113 vs 18/77,OR 0.1,95% CI 0.02 至 0.67,P=0.02)、美国麻醉医师协会表现评分大于 III(11/97 vs 33/155,OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.89, p=0.03)、慢性肾病(5/83 vs 16/77,OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.82, p=0.03)和术后败血症(9/21 vs 17/25,OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.44, p结论:神经轴镇痛技术可降低特定患者开胸手术后的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信