The differential proteomic response to ischemic stroke in appalachian subjects treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Christopher J McLouth, Benton Maglinger, Jacqueline A Frank, Hunter S Hazelwood, Jordan P Harp, Will Cranford, Shivani Pahwa, Lila Sheikhi, David Dornbos, Amanda L Trout, Ann M Stowe, Justin F Fraser, Keith R Pennypacker
{"title":"The differential proteomic response to ischemic stroke in appalachian subjects treated with mechanical thrombectomy.","authors":"Christopher J McLouth, Benton Maglinger, Jacqueline A Frank, Hunter S Hazelwood, Jordan P Harp, Will Cranford, Shivani Pahwa, Lila Sheikhi, David Dornbos, Amanda L Trout, Ann M Stowe, Justin F Fraser, Keith R Pennypacker","doi":"10.1186/s12974-024-03201-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Appalachia region of North America is known to have significant health disparities, specifically, worse risk factors and outcomes for stroke. Appalachians are more likely to have comorbidities related to stroke, such as diabetes, obesity, and tobacco use, and are often less likely to have stroke interventions, such as mechanical thrombectomy (MT), for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO). As our Comprehensive Stroke Center directly serves stroke subjects from both Appalachian and non-Appalachian areas, inflammatory proteomic biomarkers were identified associated with stroke outcomes specific to subjects residing in Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 81 subjects that met inclusion criteria for this study. These subjects underwent MT for ELVO, and carotid arterial blood samples acquired at time of intervention were sent for proteomic analysis. Samples were processed in accordance with the Blood And Clot Thrombectomy Registry And Collaboration (BACTRAC; clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03153683). Statistical analyses were utilized to examine whether relationships between protein expression and outcomes differed by Appalachian status for functional (NIH Stroke Scale; NIHSS and Modified Rankin Score; mRS), and cognitive outcomes (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MoCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in demographic data or co-morbidities when comparing Appalachian to non-Appalachian subjects. However, time from stroke onset to treatment (last known normal) was significantly longer and edema volume significantly higher in patients from Appalachia. Further, when comparing Appalachian to non-Appalachian subjects, there were significant unadjusted differences in the NIHSS functional outcome. A comprehensive analysis of 184 proteins from Olink proteomic (92 Cardiometabolic and 92 Inflammation panels) showed that the association between protein expression outcomes significantly differed by Appalachian status for seven proteins for the NIHSS, two proteins for the MoCA, and three for the mRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study utilizes an ELVO tissue bank and registry to investigate the intracranial/intravascular proteomic environment occurring at the time of thrombectomy. We found that patients presenting from Appalachian areas have different levels of proteomic expression at the time of MT when compared to patients presenting from non-Appalachian areas. These proteins differentially relate to stroke outcome and could be used as prognostic biomarkers, or as targets for novel therapies. The identification of a disparate proteomic response in Appalachian patients provides initial insight to the biological basis for health disparity. Nevertheless, further investigations through community-based studies are imperative to elucidate the underlying causes of this differential response.</p>","PeriodicalId":16577,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroinflammation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-024-03201-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Appalachia region of North America is known to have significant health disparities, specifically, worse risk factors and outcomes for stroke. Appalachians are more likely to have comorbidities related to stroke, such as diabetes, obesity, and tobacco use, and are often less likely to have stroke interventions, such as mechanical thrombectomy (MT), for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO). As our Comprehensive Stroke Center directly serves stroke subjects from both Appalachian and non-Appalachian areas, inflammatory proteomic biomarkers were identified associated with stroke outcomes specific to subjects residing in Appalachia.

Methods: There were 81 subjects that met inclusion criteria for this study. These subjects underwent MT for ELVO, and carotid arterial blood samples acquired at time of intervention were sent for proteomic analysis. Samples were processed in accordance with the Blood And Clot Thrombectomy Registry And Collaboration (BACTRAC; clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03153683). Statistical analyses were utilized to examine whether relationships between protein expression and outcomes differed by Appalachian status for functional (NIH Stroke Scale; NIHSS and Modified Rankin Score; mRS), and cognitive outcomes (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MoCA).

Results: No significant differences were found in demographic data or co-morbidities when comparing Appalachian to non-Appalachian subjects. However, time from stroke onset to treatment (last known normal) was significantly longer and edema volume significantly higher in patients from Appalachia. Further, when comparing Appalachian to non-Appalachian subjects, there were significant unadjusted differences in the NIHSS functional outcome. A comprehensive analysis of 184 proteins from Olink proteomic (92 Cardiometabolic and 92 Inflammation panels) showed that the association between protein expression outcomes significantly differed by Appalachian status for seven proteins for the NIHSS, two proteins for the MoCA, and three for the mRS.

Conclusion: Our study utilizes an ELVO tissue bank and registry to investigate the intracranial/intravascular proteomic environment occurring at the time of thrombectomy. We found that patients presenting from Appalachian areas have different levels of proteomic expression at the time of MT when compared to patients presenting from non-Appalachian areas. These proteins differentially relate to stroke outcome and could be used as prognostic biomarkers, or as targets for novel therapies. The identification of a disparate proteomic response in Appalachian patients provides initial insight to the biological basis for health disparity. Nevertheless, further investigations through community-based studies are imperative to elucidate the underlying causes of this differential response.

采用机械血栓切除术治疗缺血性中风的阿巴拉契亚人的不同蛋白质组反应。
导言:众所周知,北美的阿巴拉契亚地区存在严重的健康差异,特别是中风的风险因素和预后较差。阿巴拉契亚人更有可能患有与中风相关的合并症,如糖尿病、肥胖症和吸烟,而且通常不太可能进行中风干预,如针对紧急大血管闭塞(ELVO)的机械取栓术(MT)。由于我们的综合卒中中心直接服务于来自阿巴拉契亚和非阿巴拉契亚地区的卒中受试者,因此我们确定了与居住在阿巴拉契亚地区的受试者卒中预后相关的炎症蛋白组生物标志物:共有 81 名受试者符合本研究的纳入标准。这些受试者接受了ELVO的MT治疗,干预时采集的颈动脉血液样本被送去进行蛋白质组分析。样本按照血栓血块切除术注册与协作组织(BACTRAC;clinicaltrials.gov;NCT03153683)的要求进行处理。研究人员利用统计分析来检验蛋白质表达与功能(NIH Stroke Scale;NIHSS 和 Modified Rankin Score;mRS)和认知结果(Montreal Cognitive Assessment;MoCA)之间的关系是否因阿巴拉契亚人身份而异:阿巴拉契亚与非阿巴拉契亚受试者在人口统计学数据或合并疾病方面没有明显差异。但是,阿巴拉契亚患者从中风发作到接受治疗(最后一次已知正常)的时间明显更长,水肿体积明显更大。此外,在比较阿巴拉契亚与非阿巴拉契亚受试者时,NIHSS 功能结果存在显著的未调整差异。对来自Olink蛋白质组(92个心脏代谢和92个炎症面板)的184个蛋白质进行的综合分析表明,蛋白质表达结果之间的关联因阿巴拉契亚人身份而存在显著差异,其中7个蛋白质与NIHSS有关,2个蛋白质与MoCA有关,3个与mRS有关:我们的研究利用ELVO组织库和登记处调查了血栓切除术时发生的颅内/血管内蛋白质组环境。我们发现,与来自非阿巴拉契亚地区的患者相比,来自阿巴拉契亚地区的患者在进行 MT 时的蛋白质组表达水平不同。这些蛋白质与中风预后的关系不同,可用作预后生物标志物或新型疗法的靶点。在阿巴拉契亚地区患者中发现不同的蛋白质组反应为健康差异的生物学基础提供了初步见解。尽管如此,通过基于社区的研究进行进一步调查以阐明这种差异反应的根本原因仍势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Journal of Neuroinflammation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
276
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroinflammation is a peer-reviewed, open access publication that emphasizes the interaction between the immune system, particularly the innate immune system, and the nervous system. It covers various aspects, including the involvement of CNS immune mediators like microglia and astrocytes, the cytokines and chemokines they produce, and the influence of peripheral neuro-immune interactions, T cells, monocytes, complement proteins, acute phase proteins, oxidative injury, and related molecular processes. Neuroinflammation is a rapidly expanding field that has significantly enhanced our knowledge of chronic neurological diseases. It attracts researchers from diverse disciplines such as pathology, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, clinical medicine, and epidemiology. Substantial contributions to this field have been made through studies involving populations, patients, postmortem tissues, animal models, and in vitro systems. The Journal of Neuroinflammation consolidates research that centers around common pathogenic processes. It serves as a platform for integrative reviews and commentaries in this field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信