Blood flow restriction: The acute effects of body tilting and reduced gravity analogues on limb occlusion pressure.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Patrick Swain, Nick Caplan, Luke Hughes
{"title":"Blood flow restriction: The acute effects of body tilting and reduced gravity analogues on limb occlusion pressure.","authors":"Patrick Swain, Nick Caplan, Luke Hughes","doi":"10.1113/EP091874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood flow restriction (BFR) has been identified as a potential countermeasure to mitigate physiological deconditioning during spaceflight. Guidelines recommend that tourniquet pressure be prescribed relative to limb occlusion pressure (LOP); however, it is unclear whether body tilting or reduced gravity analogues influence LOP. We examined LOP at the leg and arm during supine bedrest and bodyweight suspension (BWS) at 6° head-down tilt (HDT), horizontal (0°), and 9.5° head-up tilt (HUT) positions. Twenty-seven adults (age, 26 ± 5 years; height, 1.75 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 73 ± 12 kg) completed all tilts during bedrest. A subgroup (n = 15) additionally completed the tilts during BWS. In each position, LOP was measured twice in the leg and arm using the Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System after 5 min of rest and again after a further 5 min. The LOP at the leg increased significantly from 6° HDT to 9.5° HUT in bedrest and BWS by 9-15 mmHg (Cohen's d = 0.7-1.0). Leg LOP was significantly higher during BWS at horizontal and 9.5° HUT postures relative to the same angles during bedrest by 8 mmHg (Cohen's d = 0.6). Arm LOP remained unchanged between body tilts and analogues. Intraclass correlation coefficients for LOP measurements taken after an initial and subsequent 5 min rest period in all conditions ranged between 0.91-0.95 (leg) and 0.83-0.96 (arm). It is advised that LOP be measured before the application of a vascular occlusion in the same body tilt/setting to which it is applied to minimize discrepancies between the actual and prescribed tourniquet pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood flow restriction (BFR) has been identified as a potential countermeasure to mitigate physiological deconditioning during spaceflight. Guidelines recommend that tourniquet pressure be prescribed relative to limb occlusion pressure (LOP); however, it is unclear whether body tilting or reduced gravity analogues influence LOP. We examined LOP at the leg and arm during supine bedrest and bodyweight suspension (BWS) at 6° head-down tilt (HDT), horizontal (0°), and 9.5° head-up tilt (HUT) positions. Twenty-seven adults (age, 26 ± 5 years; height, 1.75 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 73 ± 12 kg) completed all tilts during bedrest. A subgroup (n = 15) additionally completed the tilts during BWS. In each position, LOP was measured twice in the leg and arm using the Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System after 5 min of rest and again after a further 5 min. The LOP at the leg increased significantly from 6° HDT to 9.5° HUT in bedrest and BWS by 9-15 mmHg (Cohen's d = 0.7-1.0). Leg LOP was significantly higher during BWS at horizontal and 9.5° HUT postures relative to the same angles during bedrest by 8 mmHg (Cohen's d = 0.6). Arm LOP remained unchanged between body tilts and analogues. Intraclass correlation coefficients for LOP measurements taken after an initial and subsequent 5 min rest period in all conditions ranged between 0.91-0.95 (leg) and 0.83-0.96 (arm). It is advised that LOP be measured before the application of a vascular occlusion in the same body tilt/setting to which it is applied to minimize discrepancies between the actual and prescribed tourniquet pressure.

血流限制:身体倾斜和重力降低类似物对肢体闭塞压力的急性影响。
血流限制(BFR)已被确定为减轻太空飞行期间生理机能减退的潜在对策。指南建议止血带的压力应与肢体闭塞压力(LOP)相对应;但是,目前还不清楚身体倾斜或重力降低的类似物是否会影响 LOP。我们研究了在仰卧位和负重悬吊(BWS)时,头部向下倾斜(HDT)6°、水平(0°)和头部向上倾斜(HUT)9.5°位置的腿部和手臂的 LOP。27 名成年人(年龄,26 ± 5 岁;身高,1.75 ± 0.08 米;体重,73 ± 12 千克)在卧床期间完成了所有倾斜动作。一个子组(n = 15)在卧床休息期间也完成了倾斜。在每种体位下,休息 5 分钟后使用 Delfi 个性化止血带系统测量腿部和手臂的 LOP 两次,再休息 5 分钟后再次测量。在卧床和 BWS 体位下,腿部 LOP 从 6° HDT 到 9.5° HUT 显著增加了 9-15 mmHg(Cohen's d = 0.7-1.0)。在卧床休息期间,水平姿势和 9.5° HUT 姿势下的腿部 LOP 明显高于卧床休息期间的相同角度,增加了 8 mmHg(Cohen's d = 0.6)。在身体倾斜和类似姿势之间,手臂 LOP 保持不变。在所有条件下,最初休息 5 分钟后和随后休息 5 分钟后进行的 LOP 测量的类内相关系数分别为 0.91-0.95(腿部)和 0.83-0.96(手臂)。建议在使用血管闭塞器之前测量 LOP,测量时身体倾斜度/设置应与使用时相同,以尽量减少实际止血带压力与规定止血带压力之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信