The effectiveness of refutation text in confronting scientific misconceptions: A meta-analysis

IF 14.3 1区心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Psychologist Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1080/00461520.2024.2365628

Robert W. Danielson, Neil G. Jacobson, Erika A. Patall, Gale M. Sinatra, Olusola O. Adesope, Alana A. U. Kennedy, Bethany H. Bhat, Onur Ramazan, Blessing Akinrotimi, Gabriel Nketah, Gan Jin, Oluwafemi J. Sunday

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misinformation around scientific issues is rampant on social media platforms, raising concerns among educators and science communicators. A variety of approaches have been explored to confront this...

查看原文本刊更多论文

驳斥性文字在面对科学误解时的有效性：荟萃分析

围绕科学问题的错误信息在社交媒体平台上十分猖獗，引起了教育工作者和科学传播者的关注。为应对这一问题，人们探索了多种方法...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Educational Psychologist Multiple-

CiteScore

19.10

自引率

3.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Educational Psychologist is a scholarly journal dedicated to exploring the psychology of learning and instruction. Articles in this journal encompass a diverse range of perspectives, from examining psychological mechanisms to exploring social and societal phenomena related to learning and instruction. The journal publishes theoretical and conceptual articles, as well as reviews and meta-analyses, that significantly contribute to theory or advance the methods used to explore educational psychology. Emphasizing innovation and advancing understanding, the journal does not publish articles solely reporting the methods and results of empirical studies; instead, all submissions, including reviews and meta-analyses, must offer clear implications for advancing theory. In addition to regular articles, the journal features special issues that delve into important themes in educational psychology, along with focal articles accompanied by peer commentary.