Determining the efficacy of visual inspections at detecting non-biosecurity-compliant goods.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kambiz Esfandi, Saeedeh Afsar, Kate Richards, Duncan Hedderley, Samuel D J Brown, Adriana Najar-Rodriguez, Mike Ormsby
{"title":"Determining the efficacy of visual inspections at detecting non-biosecurity-compliant goods.","authors":"Kambiz Esfandi, Saeedeh Afsar, Kate Richards, Duncan Hedderley, Samuel D J Brown, Adriana Najar-Rodriguez, Mike Ormsby","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.8.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Examination of imported commodities by trained inspectors searching for pest organisms is a common practice that phytosanitary regulatory agencies use to mitigate biosecurity risks along trade pathways. To investigate the effects of target size and color on the efficacy of these visual assessments, we affixed square decals to polystyrene models of mandarins. Sample units of 100 model fruit containing up to 10 marked models were examined by inspectors. Six sizes in six shades of brown were tested across two prevalence levels. The experiment consisted of five inspection rounds where 11 inspectors examined 77 sample units within an allocated time. The probability that decals were detected increased with mark size and color contrast. Smaller, low-contrast marks were mainly missed. The prevalence rate did not affect the detectability. Through the experiment, the false-positive rate dropped from 6% to 3%, whereas false-negative rates were constant throughout. Large, dark targets were readily found with a mean recall of >90%, whereas small, pale marks had a mean recall of 9%. Increased experience made inspectors more competent at recognizing decals, reducing the false positive rate. However, constant false-negative rates indicate that experience did not prevent inspectors from overlooking targets they could not perceive.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11343003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.8.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examination of imported commodities by trained inspectors searching for pest organisms is a common practice that phytosanitary regulatory agencies use to mitigate biosecurity risks along trade pathways. To investigate the effects of target size and color on the efficacy of these visual assessments, we affixed square decals to polystyrene models of mandarins. Sample units of 100 model fruit containing up to 10 marked models were examined by inspectors. Six sizes in six shades of brown were tested across two prevalence levels. The experiment consisted of five inspection rounds where 11 inspectors examined 77 sample units within an allocated time. The probability that decals were detected increased with mark size and color contrast. Smaller, low-contrast marks were mainly missed. The prevalence rate did not affect the detectability. Through the experiment, the false-positive rate dropped from 6% to 3%, whereas false-negative rates were constant throughout. Large, dark targets were readily found with a mean recall of >90%, whereas small, pale marks had a mean recall of 9%. Increased experience made inspectors more competent at recognizing decals, reducing the false positive rate. However, constant false-negative rates indicate that experience did not prevent inspectors from overlooking targets they could not perceive.

确定目视检查在检测不符合生物安全要求的货物方面的功效。
由训练有素的检查员对进口商品进行有害生物检查,是植物检疫监管机构用来降低贸易通道生物安全风险的常用方法。为了研究目标大小和颜色对这些视觉评估效果的影响,我们在柑橘的聚苯乙烯模型上贴上了方形贴纸。检查员以 100 个模型水果为单位进行抽样检查,其中包含多达 10 个有标记的模型。在两个流行水平上测试了六种大小、六种深浅的棕色。实验包括五轮检查,11 名检查员在规定时间内检查了 77 个样本单位。检测到贴花的概率随着标记大小和颜色对比度的增加而增加。较小、对比度低的标记主要被漏检。普遍率并不影响检测率。在整个实验过程中,假阳性率从 6% 下降到 3%,而假阴性率则始终保持不变。大而深的目标很容易被发现,平均召回率大于 90%,而小而浅的目标平均召回率为 9%。经验的增加使检查员识别标记的能力增强,从而降低了假阳性率。然而,恒定的假阴性率表明,经验并不能防止检查员忽略他们无法感知的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信