A framework for health information governance: a scoping review.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Somayeh Ghaffari Heshajin, Shahram Sedghi, Sirous Panahi, Amirhossein Takian
{"title":"A framework for health information governance: a scoping review.","authors":"Somayeh Ghaffari Heshajin, Shahram Sedghi, Sirous Panahi, Amirhossein Takian","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01193-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As a newly emerged concept and a product of the twenty-first century, health information governance is expanding at a rapid rate. The necessity of information governance in the healthcare industry is evident, given the significance of health information and the current need to manage it. The objective of the present scoping review is to identify the dimensions and components of health information governance to discover how these factors impact the enhancement of healthcare systems and services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest and the Google Scholar search engine were searched from inception to June 2024. Methodological study quality was assessed using CASP checklists for selected documents. Endnote 20 was utilized to select and review articles and manage references, and MAXQDA 2020 was used for content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 documents, including 18 review, 9 qualitative and 10 mixed-method studies, were identified by literature search. Based on the findings, six core categories (including health information governance goals, advantages and applications, principles, components or elements, roles and responsibilities and processes) and 48 subcategories were identified to form a unified general framework comprising all extracted dimensions and components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the findings of this scoping review, health information governance should be regarded as a necessity in the health systems of various countries to improve and achieve their goals, particularly in developing and underdeveloped countries. Moreover, in light of the undesirable effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in various countries, the development and implementation of health information governance models at organizational, national and international levels are among the pressing concerns. Researchers can use the present findings as a comprehensive model for developing health information governance models. A possible limitation of this study is our limited access to some databases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01193-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As a newly emerged concept and a product of the twenty-first century, health information governance is expanding at a rapid rate. The necessity of information governance in the healthcare industry is evident, given the significance of health information and the current need to manage it. The objective of the present scoping review is to identify the dimensions and components of health information governance to discover how these factors impact the enhancement of healthcare systems and services.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest and the Google Scholar search engine were searched from inception to June 2024. Methodological study quality was assessed using CASP checklists for selected documents. Endnote 20 was utilized to select and review articles and manage references, and MAXQDA 2020 was used for content analysis.

Results: A total of 37 documents, including 18 review, 9 qualitative and 10 mixed-method studies, were identified by literature search. Based on the findings, six core categories (including health information governance goals, advantages and applications, principles, components or elements, roles and responsibilities and processes) and 48 subcategories were identified to form a unified general framework comprising all extracted dimensions and components.

Conclusions: Based on the findings of this scoping review, health information governance should be regarded as a necessity in the health systems of various countries to improve and achieve their goals, particularly in developing and underdeveloped countries. Moreover, in light of the undesirable effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in various countries, the development and implementation of health information governance models at organizational, national and international levels are among the pressing concerns. Researchers can use the present findings as a comprehensive model for developing health information governance models. A possible limitation of this study is our limited access to some databases.

卫生信息管理框架:范围审查。
背景:作为一个新出现的概念和二十一世纪的产物,医疗信息治理正在迅速发展。鉴于健康信息的重要性和当前对其管理的需求,信息治理在医疗保健行业的必要性显而易见。本范围综述的目的是确定医疗信息治理的各个层面和组成部分,以发现这些因素如何影响医疗保健系统和服务的提升:方法:对 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、ProQuest 和 Google Scholar 搜索引擎从开始到 2024 年 6 月进行了检索。采用 CASP 检查表对所选文献进行方法学研究质量评估。使用 Endnote 20 挑选和审阅文章并管理参考文献,使用 MAXQDA 2020 进行内容分析:通过文献检索共发现 37 篇文献,包括 18 篇综述性研究、9 篇定性研究和 10 篇混合方法研究。根据研究结果,确定了六个核心类别(包括卫生信息治理目标、优势和应用、原则、组成部分或要素、角色和责任以及流程)和 48 个子类别,形成了一个统一的总体框架,包括所有提取的维度和组成部分:根据此次范围界定审查的结果,卫生信息治理应被视为各国卫生系统改善和实现其目标的必要条件,特别是在发展中国家和欠发达国家。此外,鉴于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在各国造成的不良影响,在组织、国家和国际层面制定和实施卫生信息治理模式是当务之急。研究人员可将本研究结果作为开发卫生信息治理模式的综合模型。本研究可能存在的一个局限性是我们获取某些数据库的途径有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信