The Surprise Question and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2024-08-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0093
Jeanette M Wallin, Stefan H Jacobson, Lena Axelsson, Jenny Lindberg, Carina I Persson, Jenny Stenberg, Agneta Wennman-Larsen
{"title":"The Surprise Question and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.","authors":"Jeanette M Wallin, Stefan H Jacobson, Lena Axelsson, Jenny Lindberg, Carina I Persson, Jenny Stenberg, Agneta Wennman-Larsen","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Surprise Question (SQ) is a common method aimed at identifying frail patients who need serious illness conversations to integrate a palliative approach. However, little is known about whether the SQ identifies patients on hemodialysis who perceive that they are declining or have low health-related quality of life (HRQoL)-important aspects when considering the need for serious illness conversations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how nurses and physicians' responses to the SQ are associated with patients' self-reported HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>In total, 282 patients on hemodialysis were included.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>One nurse and one physician responded to the SQ for each patient. The patient-reported HRQoL was measured with the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36) and the EuroQual vertical visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQual-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurses' responses \"no, not surprised\" to the SQ were associated with patient-reported worsened health compared to one year ago (RAND-36), and lower perceived overall health (EQ-VAS). Physicians' responses \"no, not surprised\" were associated with lower overall health and lower physical functioning. Patient-reported pain, general health, fatigue, and emotional and social aspects were not associated with responses to the SQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that the SQ identifies patients on hemodialysis who report low overall health and low physical functioning. However, the SQ did not identify patients who reported pain, emotional problems, or fatigue, which are also important aspects to consider in identifying needs for serious illness conversations, symptom management, and to be able to integrate a palliative approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Surprise Question (SQ) is a common method aimed at identifying frail patients who need serious illness conversations to integrate a palliative approach. However, little is known about whether the SQ identifies patients on hemodialysis who perceive that they are declining or have low health-related quality of life (HRQoL)-important aspects when considering the need for serious illness conversations.

Objective: To explore how nurses and physicians' responses to the SQ are associated with patients' self-reported HRQoL.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Subjects: In total, 282 patients on hemodialysis were included.

Measurements: One nurse and one physician responded to the SQ for each patient. The patient-reported HRQoL was measured with the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36) and the EuroQual vertical visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQual-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D).

Results: Nurses' responses "no, not surprised" to the SQ were associated with patient-reported worsened health compared to one year ago (RAND-36), and lower perceived overall health (EQ-VAS). Physicians' responses "no, not surprised" were associated with lower overall health and lower physical functioning. Patient-reported pain, general health, fatigue, and emotional and social aspects were not associated with responses to the SQ.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that the SQ identifies patients on hemodialysis who report low overall health and low physical functioning. However, the SQ did not identify patients who reported pain, emotional problems, or fatigue, which are also important aspects to consider in identifying needs for serious illness conversations, symptom management, and to be able to integrate a palliative approach.

惊喜问题与血液透析患者的健康相关生活质量:一项横断面多中心研究。
背景:惊喜问题(SQ)是一种常见的方法,旨在识别需要进行重症谈话以整合姑息治疗方法的虚弱患者。然而,人们对 SQ 是否能识别出认为自己病情恶化或健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)低下的血液透析患者知之甚少,而这正是考虑是否需要进行重病谈话的重要方面:探讨护士和医生对 SQ 的反应与患者自我报告的 HRQoL 之间的关系:设计:横断面研究:共纳入 282 名血液透析患者:每名患者由一名护士和一名医生回答 SQ。患者报告的 HRQoL 采用兰德 36 项健康调查 1.0(RAND-36)和欧洲量表五维问卷(EQ-5D)中的欧洲量表垂直视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)进行测量:护士对 SQ 的回答 "否,不惊讶 "与患者报告的健康状况比一年前恶化(RAND-36)和总体健康感知降低(EQ-VAS)有关。医生的回答 "不是,不惊讶 "与总体健康状况较差和身体机能较低有关。患者报告的疼痛、一般健康状况、疲劳以及情绪和社交方面与对 SQ 的反应无关:研究结果表明,SQ 能识别出总体健康状况较差和身体机能较低的血液透析患者。然而,SQ 并未识别出报告疼痛、情绪问题或疲劳的患者,而这些方面也是在识别重病谈话需求、症状管理以及整合姑息治疗方法时需要考虑的重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信