Ten year re-assessment after introduction of forb communities into species poor temperate grassland

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Mona Chor Bjørn , Marian Ørgaard
{"title":"Ten year re-assessment after introduction of forb communities into species poor temperate grassland","authors":"Mona Chor Bjørn ,&nbsp;Marian Ørgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Floristic diversification of grasslands through introduction of forb communities is a potential method for supporting biodiversity. We re-assessed community development within a 10 year field trial in Denmark in which forb communities had been transplanted into bare subsoil on previously-farmed land in open gaps in 2010. The randomized block experiment included un-planted vegetation free control plots on subsoil. Experimental forbs are common to the northwest European flora. In 2020 the community development was re-evaluated. All plots had developed into forb dominated, dense communities in which it was clear that species richness had declined primarily due to loss of annual and biennial species including increased density of the vegetation. On average, the colonization of graminoids was higher in the control plots compared to the treatment plots. Across the experiment, patches of grass e.g. <em>Festuca rubra</em> had colonized transplanted plots and defeated some forbs. The transplanted forbs <em>Achillea millefolium</em>, <em>Agrimonia eupatoria</em>, and <em>Galium mollugo</em> were widespread in all plots. Control plots had been colonized by species from the surroundings including the treatment plots. Our long-term results show that forb introduced communities were highly resistant to grass colonization for many years. Exposed subsoil can develop into forb dominated spots provided that a propagule source is close by. Top soil stripping combined with introduction of forb community hotspots is an effective tool for limiting germination and establishment of aggressive competitor species from soil seed bank and surroundings. Winter-cutting is a potential, low-input management technique for diversification, however further studies are needed to investigate whether the technique in itself is sufficient to diversify species-poor temperate grasslands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001782/pdfft?md5=f23438eea29116e108c34e1505b5c23e&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001782-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Floristic diversification of grasslands through introduction of forb communities is a potential method for supporting biodiversity. We re-assessed community development within a 10 year field trial in Denmark in which forb communities had been transplanted into bare subsoil on previously-farmed land in open gaps in 2010. The randomized block experiment included un-planted vegetation free control plots on subsoil. Experimental forbs are common to the northwest European flora. In 2020 the community development was re-evaluated. All plots had developed into forb dominated, dense communities in which it was clear that species richness had declined primarily due to loss of annual and biennial species including increased density of the vegetation. On average, the colonization of graminoids was higher in the control plots compared to the treatment plots. Across the experiment, patches of grass e.g. Festuca rubra had colonized transplanted plots and defeated some forbs. The transplanted forbs Achillea millefolium, Agrimonia eupatoria, and Galium mollugo were widespread in all plots. Control plots had been colonized by species from the surroundings including the treatment plots. Our long-term results show that forb introduced communities were highly resistant to grass colonization for many years. Exposed subsoil can develop into forb dominated spots provided that a propagule source is close by. Top soil stripping combined with introduction of forb community hotspots is an effective tool for limiting germination and establishment of aggressive competitor species from soil seed bank and surroundings. Winter-cutting is a potential, low-input management technique for diversification, however further studies are needed to investigate whether the technique in itself is sufficient to diversify species-poor temperate grasslands.

在物种贫乏的温带草地引入禁止植物群落后的十年再评估
通过引入禁止植物群落实现草地花卉多样化是支持生物多样性的一种潜在方法。我们重新评估了丹麦一项为期 10 年的田间试验中的群落发展情况,该试验于 2010 年将禁止植物群落移植到以前耕种过的空地上的裸露底土中。随机区组实验包括底土上未种植植被的对照小区。实验草本植物是西北欧植物区系中常见的植物。2020 年,对群落发展情况进行了重新评估。所有地块都已发展成以草本植物为主的茂密群落,其中物种丰富度明显下降,主要原因是一年生和二年生物种的减少,包括植被密度的增加。平均而言,与处理地块相比,对照地块的禾本科植物定植率更高。在整个实验过程中,成片的禾本科植物(如红马齿苋)在移植地块上定植,并击败了一些草本植物。移植的草本植物 Achillea millefolium、Agrimonia eupatoria 和 Galium mollugo 在所有地块都很普遍。对照地块已被包括处理地块在内的周围环境中的物种定殖。我们的长期研究结果表明,禁止引入的群落多年来对草的定植具有很强的抵抗力。只要附近有繁殖源,裸露的底土就能发展成以禁止植物为主的区域。表层土壤剥离与引入禁草群落热点相结合,是限制土壤种子库和周围环境中侵蚀性竞争物种发芽和建立的有效工具。冬割是一种潜在的、低投入的多样化管理技术,但还需要进一步的研究,以调查这种技术本身是否足以使物种贫乏的温带草地多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信