Satoshi Hosoya , Sena Awano-Kim , Ryo Yokomizo , Yuichiro Ukon , Kazuki Morita , Yuta Kasahara , Hiroshi Kishi , Aikou Okamoto
{"title":"Regenerative medicine in Obstetrics & Gynecology: Current status under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine in Japan","authors":"Satoshi Hosoya , Sena Awano-Kim , Ryo Yokomizo , Yuichiro Ukon , Kazuki Morita , Yuta Kasahara , Hiroshi Kishi , Aikou Okamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.reth.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>While the provision of unapproved regenerative medicine has been problematic worldwide, few studies have examined the implementation status of regenerative medicine (RM) in the specific field. This study aimed to determine the current status of therapy and clinical research in the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) in Japan under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (RM Act).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Detailed data were extracted from publicly available websites provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. We extracted descriptive details, including risk classification of the RM Act, modality, target disease, locality, institution, and administration route. For therapy, the price for each modality was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The total number of therapeutic provision plans in OBGYN (1.9% of RM in Japan) are classified as Class II (moderate) risk. Most were administered in clinics in urban areas for treating endometrial or ovarian infertility by locally administering platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The price using MSCs is approximately eight times more expensive that of those involving PRP (1832.1 ± 1139.8 vs 240.8 ± 106.5 thousand yen, p < 0.0001). Regarding research, four plans (2.2%) were submitted to target implantation failure and advanced gynecological cancer using autologous lymphocytes, dendritic cells, or MSCs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The RM Act permits knowledge of the current status of regenerative medicine even for unapproved uses in a specific clinical field. The study findings shall prompt a worldwide discussion regarding the required regulations for therapy and clinical research of RM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20895,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 564-570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001391/pdfft?md5=03dca65353bf40aa19ebdbb6e87d1e11&pid=1-s2.0-S2352320424001391-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
While the provision of unapproved regenerative medicine has been problematic worldwide, few studies have examined the implementation status of regenerative medicine (RM) in the specific field. This study aimed to determine the current status of therapy and clinical research in the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) in Japan under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (RM Act).
Methods
Detailed data were extracted from publicly available websites provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. We extracted descriptive details, including risk classification of the RM Act, modality, target disease, locality, institution, and administration route. For therapy, the price for each modality was evaluated.
Results
The total number of therapeutic provision plans in OBGYN (1.9% of RM in Japan) are classified as Class II (moderate) risk. Most were administered in clinics in urban areas for treating endometrial or ovarian infertility by locally administering platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The price using MSCs is approximately eight times more expensive that of those involving PRP (1832.1 ± 1139.8 vs 240.8 ± 106.5 thousand yen, p < 0.0001). Regarding research, four plans (2.2%) were submitted to target implantation failure and advanced gynecological cancer using autologous lymphocytes, dendritic cells, or MSCs.
Conclusion
The RM Act permits knowledge of the current status of regenerative medicine even for unapproved uses in a specific clinical field. The study findings shall prompt a worldwide discussion regarding the required regulations for therapy and clinical research of RM.
期刊介绍:
Regenerative Therapy is the official peer-reviewed online journal of the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine.
Regenerative Therapy is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and reviews of basic research, clinical translation, industrial development, and regulatory issues focusing on stem cell biology, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine.