How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Fanfan Dai, Yanhui Sang, Jingjing Zeng, Hongjian Wang, Yichun Pan, Jianhui Zhao, Tianmin Xu, Guang Shu
{"title":"How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?","authors":"Fanfan Dai,&nbsp;Yanhui Sang,&nbsp;Jingjing Zeng,&nbsp;Hongjian Wang,&nbsp;Yichun Pan,&nbsp;Jianhui Zhao,&nbsp;Tianmin Xu,&nbsp;Guang Shu","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, <i>p</i> &lt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ocr.12842","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results

In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24–5.74 mm DPARMs, p < .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70–0.93 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57–0.65 mm DPARMs, p < .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (−0.65 to −0.96 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (−0.75 mm DPARMs, p < .05).

Conclusions

In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.

Abstract Image

在四个第一前磨牙拔除病例中,使用隐适美矫正器预测牙根移动的准确性如何?
研究目的本研究旨在比较四次第一前磨牙拔除和隐适美治疗后成人牙根移动的实现情况和预测情况:这项回顾性研究纳入了来自一个临床科室的连续 33 名成年人(22 名 I 类、9 名 Cusp-to-cusp II 类和 2 名 Cusp-to-cusp III 类),他们在拔除前磨牙后完成了第一轮矫治。将治疗前的锥束计算机断层扫描模型登记到治疗前的表面扫描牙科模型(SSDM)上,以确定治疗前整个牙列的根尖位置。然后将其复制并转移到预测的和实现的治疗后 SSDM 上,以获得预测的和实现的治疗后根尖的位置。使用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验对预测的牙根移动(DPARMs)和实现的牙根移动(DPARMs)之间的差异进行检验:结果:在前胸方向上,上颌和下颌前牙的牙根后移效果不佳(DPARMs 为 3.24-5.74 mm,P在使用隐适美进行的四次第一前磨牙拔除治疗中,牙根移动未达到预期效果,尤其是前牙在前胸方向的移动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信