Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cross-sectional study using a nationwide inpatient database.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hiroshi Magara, Takuaki Tani, Shinobu Imai, Anna Kiyomi, Kiyohide Fushimi, Munetoshi Sugiura
{"title":"Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cross-sectional study using a nationwide inpatient database.","authors":"Hiroshi Magara, Takuaki Tani, Shinobu Imai, Anna Kiyomi, Kiyohide Fushimi, Munetoshi Sugiura","doi":"10.1186/s40780-024-00370-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fasudil and ozagrel are drugs with the same indications for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in Japan. However, there have been no definitive conclusions on the clinical efficacy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium monotherapy or their combination. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the combined administration of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium in Japanese patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used Diagnosis Procedure Combination data to assess patients who were hospitalized with SAH and received fasudil hydrochloride or ozagrel sodium between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 17,346). The participants were divided into three groups based on the treatment received: fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy (F group, n = 10,484), ozagrel sodium monotherapy (O group, n = 465), and fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy (FO group, n = 6,397). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis (significance level, 5%) was used for data analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the multivariable analysis, adjusted for factors considered to impact prognosis, showed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with the F group as the reference for in-hospital mortality was 0.94 in the FO group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.08, p = 0.355), with no differences compared to the F group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium had different mechanisms of action, suggesting a synergistic effect of combination therapy. However, a comparison of fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy and combination therapy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium showed no difference in the prognostic effect. Therefore, it was suggested that fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy may be sufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-024-00370-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fasudil and ozagrel are drugs with the same indications for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in Japan. However, there have been no definitive conclusions on the clinical efficacy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium monotherapy or their combination. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the combined administration of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium in Japanese patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

Methods: This cross-sectional study used Diagnosis Procedure Combination data to assess patients who were hospitalized with SAH and received fasudil hydrochloride or ozagrel sodium between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 17,346). The participants were divided into three groups based on the treatment received: fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy (F group, n = 10,484), ozagrel sodium monotherapy (O group, n = 465), and fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy (FO group, n = 6,397). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis (significance level, 5%) was used for data analyses.

Results: The results of the multivariable analysis, adjusted for factors considered to impact prognosis, showed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with the F group as the reference for in-hospital mortality was 0.94 in the FO group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.08, p = 0.355), with no differences compared to the F group.

Conclusion: Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium had different mechanisms of action, suggesting a synergistic effect of combination therapy. However, a comparison of fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy and combination therapy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium showed no difference in the prognostic effect. Therefore, it was suggested that fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy may be sufficient.

针对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的盐酸法舒地尔和奥扎格雷钠联合疗法:一项利用全国住院患者数据库进行的横断面研究。
背景:在日本,法舒地尔和奥扎格雷是具有相同适应症的治疗脑血管痉挛的药物。然而,盐酸法舒地尔和奥扎格雷钠单药治疗或联合用药的临床疗效尚无定论。因此,我们旨在研究盐酸法舒地尔和奥扎格雷钠联合用药对日本蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者的疗效:这项横断面研究使用诊断程序组合数据评估了2016年4月至2020年3月期间因SAH住院并接受盐酸法舒地尔或奥扎格雷钠治疗的患者(n = 17346)。根据接受的治疗将参与者分为三组:盐酸法舒地尔单药治疗组(F 组,n = 10,484 人)、奥扎格雷钠单药治疗组(O 组,n = 465 人)和盐酸法舒地尔和奥扎格雷钠联合治疗组(FO 组,n = 6,397 人)。主要结果是院内死亡率。数据分析采用多变量调整逻辑回归分析(显著性水平为5%):根据影响预后的因素进行调整后的多变量分析结果显示,以 F 组为参照的 FO 组院内死亡率调整后的几率比(OR)为 0.94(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.81-1.08,P = 0.355),与 F 组相比无差异:结论:盐酸法舒地尔和奥扎格雷钠具有不同的作用机制,这表明联合治疗具有协同效应。然而,对比盐酸法舒地尔单药治疗和盐酸法舒地尔与奥扎格雷钠联合治疗,结果显示预后效果无差异。因此,有人认为盐酸法舒地尔单药治疗可能就足够了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信