A comparison of air pollution control systems for municipal solid waste incinerators.

G B Frame
{"title":"A comparison of air pollution control systems for municipal solid waste incinerators.","authors":"G B Frame","doi":"10.1080/08940630.1988.10466449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Flakt dry adsorption system (DAS) with reactors and quasi dry or wet-dry lime slurry absorption systems with spray dryers (DRYPAC) achieve the high removal efficiencies required by the ever more restrictive environmental regulations in the 80s and 90s. Results of acid gas removals range up to 98 percent for HCl and 95 percent for SO/sub 2/ as measured at commercial plants and over an extensive testing program at a pilot plant at the municipal incinerator in Quebec City, Canada. Organic removals for the toxic chlorinated dioxins and furans approach 99.9 percent plus under most fabric filter temperatures at the Quebec City pilot facility, while similar removal values are obtained at full size installations in Europe. The latter tests were carried out at seven MSW plants located at Busto Arsizio (Milan), Lugo (Ravenna) in Italy; Kempten and Geiselbullach (near Munich) in Germany; and Sysav, Hogdalen, Linkoping in southern Sweden. This paper presents a description of the two systems. A comparison between DAS and DRYPAC technology is presented with operating and test results for the two alternative systems. In evaluating the two systems, the completely dry injection system (DAS) has a capital and operating cost advantage for incinerators of 250-300 TM/daymore » of MSW. No difference was determined, however, in acid gas removal efficiencies for the two alternatives.« less","PeriodicalId":77731,"journal":{"name":"JAPCA","volume":"38 8","pages":"1081-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08940630.1988.10466449","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAPCA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08940630.1988.10466449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Flakt dry adsorption system (DAS) with reactors and quasi dry or wet-dry lime slurry absorption systems with spray dryers (DRYPAC) achieve the high removal efficiencies required by the ever more restrictive environmental regulations in the 80s and 90s. Results of acid gas removals range up to 98 percent for HCl and 95 percent for SO/sub 2/ as measured at commercial plants and over an extensive testing program at a pilot plant at the municipal incinerator in Quebec City, Canada. Organic removals for the toxic chlorinated dioxins and furans approach 99.9 percent plus under most fabric filter temperatures at the Quebec City pilot facility, while similar removal values are obtained at full size installations in Europe. The latter tests were carried out at seven MSW plants located at Busto Arsizio (Milan), Lugo (Ravenna) in Italy; Kempten and Geiselbullach (near Munich) in Germany; and Sysav, Hogdalen, Linkoping in southern Sweden. This paper presents a description of the two systems. A comparison between DAS and DRYPAC technology is presented with operating and test results for the two alternative systems. In evaluating the two systems, the completely dry injection system (DAS) has a capital and operating cost advantage for incinerators of 250-300 TM/daymore » of MSW. No difference was determined, however, in acid gas removal efficiencies for the two alternatives.« less
城市生活垃圾焚烧炉大气污染控制系统的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信