Entrapment in the military context: Factor structure and associations with suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Justin C Baker, Sam Cacace, Robert J Cramer, Susan Rasmussen, Christiana Martin, Alexis M May, Cynthia Thomsen, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Craig J Bryan
{"title":"Entrapment in the military context: Factor structure and associations with suicidal thoughts and behaviors.","authors":"Justin C Baker, Sam Cacace, Robert J Cramer, Susan Rasmussen, Christiana Martin, Alexis M May, Cynthia Thomsen, AnnaBelle O Bryan, Craig J Bryan","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improved understanding of how US service members transition from chronic/baseline to acute suicide risk is warranted. One such model, the Integrated Motivational Volitional Model of Suicide, posits entrapment as central to this process. However, entrapment has not been extensively investigated within military populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examines the factor structure, reliability, and predictive validity of the Entrapment Scale (E-Scale) within a military population. Exploratory structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis compared one- versus two-factor structures of the E-Scale. Autoregressive SEM assessed if E-Scale scores predicted suicidal ideation and suicide attempt likelihood at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and examined whether the impact of entrapment was moderated by social support (i.e., appraisal, tangible, and belonging).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results favored a two-factor solution (external and internal) of entrapment. The relationship between entrapment and suicide outcomes was moderated by perceived social support but in unexpected directions. Unexpectedly, social support strengthened the relationship between external entrapment and suicide outcomes for most models. Only tangible support moderated the relationship between internal entrapment (IE) and suicide outcomes as predicted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IE is linked with suicidal ideation in the short-term, whereas external entrapments relationship with suicide outcomes may reflect more persistent social challenges for military members.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improved understanding of how US service members transition from chronic/baseline to acute suicide risk is warranted. One such model, the Integrated Motivational Volitional Model of Suicide, posits entrapment as central to this process. However, entrapment has not been extensively investigated within military populations.

Methods: This study examines the factor structure, reliability, and predictive validity of the Entrapment Scale (E-Scale) within a military population. Exploratory structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis compared one- versus two-factor structures of the E-Scale. Autoregressive SEM assessed if E-Scale scores predicted suicidal ideation and suicide attempt likelihood at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and examined whether the impact of entrapment was moderated by social support (i.e., appraisal, tangible, and belonging).

Results: Results favored a two-factor solution (external and internal) of entrapment. The relationship between entrapment and suicide outcomes was moderated by perceived social support but in unexpected directions. Unexpectedly, social support strengthened the relationship between external entrapment and suicide outcomes for most models. Only tangible support moderated the relationship between internal entrapment (IE) and suicide outcomes as predicted.

Conclusions: IE is linked with suicidal ideation in the short-term, whereas external entrapments relationship with suicide outcomes may reflect more persistent social challenges for military members.

军事背景下的诱捕:因素结构以及与自杀想法和行为的关联。
背景:有必要进一步了解美国军人如何从慢性/基线自杀风险过渡到急性自杀风险。其中一种模式,即自杀动机意志综合模式,认为诱导是这一过程的核心。然而,在军人群体中尚未对诱导因素进行广泛研究:本研究探讨了诱捕量表(E-Scale)在军人群体中的因子结构、可靠性和预测有效性。探索性结构方程建模(SEM)和确认性因子分析比较了 E-Scale 的单因子结构和双因子结构。自回归 SEM 评估了 E 量表得分是否能预测 6 个月和 12 个月随访时的自杀意念和自杀未遂可能性,并考察了社会支持(即评价、有形支持和归属感)是否能调节诱捕的影响:结果:研究结果表明,诱发自杀的两个因素(外部因素和内部因素)共同作用。诱捕与自杀结果之间的关系受到感知到的社会支持的调节,但调节方向出乎意料。出乎意料的是,在大多数模型中,社会支持加强了外部诱捕与自杀结果之间的关系。只有有形支持如预测的那样调节了内部诱捕(IE)与自杀结果之间的关系:结论:IE 与短期自杀意念有关,而外部束缚与自杀结果的关系可能反映了军人面临的更持久的社会挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信