Impella 5.5 Support for Delayed Surgical Ventricular Septal Defect Repair-A Paradigm Shift?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kaveh Eghbalzadeh, Clara Großmann, Ihor Krasivskyi, Ilija Djordjevic, Elmar W Kuhn, Christian Origel Romero, Farhad Bakhtiary, Navid Mader, Antje Christin Deppe, Thorsten C W Wahlers
{"title":"Impella 5.5 Support for Delayed Surgical Ventricular Septal Defect Repair-A Paradigm Shift?","authors":"Kaveh Eghbalzadeh, Clara Großmann, Ihor Krasivskyi, Ilija Djordjevic, Elmar W Kuhn, Christian Origel Romero, Farhad Bakhtiary, Navid Mader, Antje Christin Deppe, Thorsten C W Wahlers","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) remain a rare but life-threatening complication of myocardial infarction. Although the incidence has decreased due to better treatment options, the mortality rate remains high. The timing of VSD repair remains critical to outcome. The use of mechanical circulatory support is rarely described in the literature, although it may help to delay repair to allow tissue stabilization. While Impella is currently considered contraindicated due to the potential worsening of the right-to-left shunt and possible systemic embolization of necrotic debris, there is no comprehensive evidence for this. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether the use of Impella 5.5 as a first choice for patients undergoing VSD repair should be considered for discussion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This retrospective study analyses four consecutive patients who underwent delayed ventricular septal repair after prior implantation of Impella 5.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts, United States).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 75% of patients (<i>n</i> = 3) presented with acute right heart failure prior to implantation with a mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 64 ± 3.0 mmHg. Implantation was performed under local anesthesia in three cases. The mean time to surgery was 9.8 ± 3.1 days. All patients remained on the Impella 5.5 device postoperatively. Weaning from Impella 5.5 was successful in 75% (<i>n</i> = 3). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 22.3 ± 7.5 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Preoperative implantation of the Impella 5.5 device is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing VSD repair. Outcomes may be improved by performing Impella implantation under local anesthesia and continuing Impella support after VSD repair. However, it is important to note that these patients represent a high-risk cohort and the mortality rate remains high.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) remain a rare but life-threatening complication of myocardial infarction. Although the incidence has decreased due to better treatment options, the mortality rate remains high. The timing of VSD repair remains critical to outcome. The use of mechanical circulatory support is rarely described in the literature, although it may help to delay repair to allow tissue stabilization. While Impella is currently considered contraindicated due to the potential worsening of the right-to-left shunt and possible systemic embolization of necrotic debris, there is no comprehensive evidence for this. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether the use of Impella 5.5 as a first choice for patients undergoing VSD repair should be considered for discussion.

Methods:  This retrospective study analyses four consecutive patients who underwent delayed ventricular septal repair after prior implantation of Impella 5.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts, United States).

Results:  A total of 75% of patients (n = 3) presented with acute right heart failure prior to implantation with a mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 64 ± 3.0 mmHg. Implantation was performed under local anesthesia in three cases. The mean time to surgery was 9.8 ± 3.1 days. All patients remained on the Impella 5.5 device postoperatively. Weaning from Impella 5.5 was successful in 75% (n = 3). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 22.3 ± 7.5 days.

Conclusion:  Preoperative implantation of the Impella 5.5 device is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing VSD repair. Outcomes may be improved by performing Impella implantation under local anesthesia and continuing Impella support after VSD repair. However, it is important to note that these patients represent a high-risk cohort and the mortality rate remains high.

Impella 5.5 支持延迟手术室间隔缺损修复--范式转变?
背景:室间隔缺损(VSD)仍然是心肌梗死的一种罕见但却危及生命的并发症。虽然由于有了更好的治疗方案,发病率有所下降,但死亡率仍然很高。VSD 修复的时机对治疗效果至关重要。文献中很少描述使用机械循环支持的情况,尽管它可能有助于推迟修复时间,使组织趋于稳定。由于右向左分流可能恶化以及坏死碎片可能全身栓塞,Impella 目前被认为是禁忌症,但并没有全面的证据证明这一点。因此,我们旨在分析是否应考虑讨论将 Impella 5.5 作为 VSD 修复术患者的首选:这项回顾性研究分析了连续四例在植入 Impella 5.5(Abiomed 公司,美国马萨诸塞州丹佛斯)后接受延迟室间隔修补术的患者:结果:共有 75% 的患者(n = 3)在植入前出现急性右心衰竭,平均肺动脉收缩压为 64 ± 3.0 mmHg。三例患者的植入手术均在局部麻醉下进行。平均手术时间为 9.8 ± 3.1 天。所有患者术后仍使用 Impella 5.5 装置。75% 的患者(n = 3)成功从 Impella 5.5 设备断奶。在重症监护室的平均住院时间为(22.3 ± 7.5)天:结论:对于接受 VSD 修复术的患者来说,术前植入 Impella 5.5 装置是一种安全可行的选择。在局部麻醉下进行 Impella 植入术,并在 VSD 修复术后继续使用 Impella 支持,可能会改善疗效。但必须注意的是,这些患者属于高危人群,死亡率仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信