Multiclass and multi-residue determination of pesticides and antibiotics in sediment from an aquacultural environment based on modified dispersive solid-phase extraction
{"title":"Multiclass and multi-residue determination of pesticides and antibiotics in sediment from an aquacultural environment based on modified dispersive solid-phase extraction","authors":"Zhuozhen Qian, Shuifen Tang, Zhiyu Liu, Fangfang Luo, Yanting Chen, Shaohong Wei","doi":"10.1002/jssc.202400110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method was developed for the multi-residue analysis of pesticides and antibiotics in aquaculture sediment using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The developed method is based on ultrasonic extraction with acetonitrile and phosphate buffer, salting with sodium chloride, and cleaning with dispersive solid-phase extraction adsorbent using primary secondary amine, C<sub>18</sub>, and graphitized carbon black, followed by HPLC-MS/MS detection. We optimized different extraction methods and the ratio of the cleanup adsorbents to achieve good recoveries at three spiking levels that ranged from 60.4% to 114% with a relative standard deviation below 15% (<i>n</i> = 6). For all analytes, except for flufenoxuron, the limits of quantification were between 1 and 5 µg/kg (dry weight). The validated method was successfully applied to real samples collected from 20 aquacultural ponds, confirming the feasibility of the proposed method. The concentrations of the target analytes in the sediments (dry weight) were in the ranges of 2.2–35.0 µg/kg for sulfonamides, 0–409.1 µg/kg for quinolones, 0–6.56 µg/kg for macrolides, and 0–4.9 µg/kg for pesticides. Moreover, the co-occurrence of pesticides and antibiotics may potentially pose a high risk to sediment-dwelling organisms in nine out of the 20 investigated locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"47 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.202400110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method was developed for the multi-residue analysis of pesticides and antibiotics in aquaculture sediment using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The developed method is based on ultrasonic extraction with acetonitrile and phosphate buffer, salting with sodium chloride, and cleaning with dispersive solid-phase extraction adsorbent using primary secondary amine, C18, and graphitized carbon black, followed by HPLC-MS/MS detection. We optimized different extraction methods and the ratio of the cleanup adsorbents to achieve good recoveries at three spiking levels that ranged from 60.4% to 114% with a relative standard deviation below 15% (n = 6). For all analytes, except for flufenoxuron, the limits of quantification were between 1 and 5 µg/kg (dry weight). The validated method was successfully applied to real samples collected from 20 aquacultural ponds, confirming the feasibility of the proposed method. The concentrations of the target analytes in the sediments (dry weight) were in the ranges of 2.2–35.0 µg/kg for sulfonamides, 0–409.1 µg/kg for quinolones, 0–6.56 µg/kg for macrolides, and 0–4.9 µg/kg for pesticides. Moreover, the co-occurrence of pesticides and antibiotics may potentially pose a high risk to sediment-dwelling organisms in nine out of the 20 investigated locations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.