Fatigue testing strategies for the X65 steel catenary riser with small-scale specimens considering the effect of welding residual stress

IF 3.1 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Niantao Zhang, Caiyan Deng, Hang Liang, Baoming Gong, Yong Liu
{"title":"Fatigue testing strategies for the X65 steel catenary riser with small-scale specimens considering the effect of welding residual stress","authors":"Niantao Zhang,&nbsp;Caiyan Deng,&nbsp;Hang Liang,&nbsp;Baoming Gong,&nbsp;Yong Liu","doi":"10.1111/ffe.14373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To accurately evaluate the fatigue performance of a full-scale deep-water steel catenary riser (SCR) using small-size specimens, six fatigue testing strategies were explored, considering the effect of welding residual stress. Through a comparison with the full-scale resonant bending fatigue testing results, the most equivalent strategy using small-scale specimens was identified. The results indicate that the test strategies applying constant stress underestimated the fatigue life, compared with that of a full-scale specimen; meanwhile, fatigue life values obtained from the low-stress ratio testing strategy were higher, particularly in the low-stress range region. Comparatively, the fatigue lives obtained for the 100 mm-wide specimens without cutting were higher in the high-stress range region. The variable-applied mean stress strategy using the 25 mm-wide welded joint specimen was the most suitable for equivalence with the full-scale fatigue testing, with only a 9.7% difference in the fatigue life testing results. The difference between the applied mean stress and the actual transverse welding residual stress under various fatigue testing strategies is the key factor affecting the equivalence of the fatigue testing results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12298,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","volume":"47 9","pages":"3220-3231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.14373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To accurately evaluate the fatigue performance of a full-scale deep-water steel catenary riser (SCR) using small-size specimens, six fatigue testing strategies were explored, considering the effect of welding residual stress. Through a comparison with the full-scale resonant bending fatigue testing results, the most equivalent strategy using small-scale specimens was identified. The results indicate that the test strategies applying constant stress underestimated the fatigue life, compared with that of a full-scale specimen; meanwhile, fatigue life values obtained from the low-stress ratio testing strategy were higher, particularly in the low-stress range region. Comparatively, the fatigue lives obtained for the 100 mm-wide specimens without cutting were higher in the high-stress range region. The variable-applied mean stress strategy using the 25 mm-wide welded joint specimen was the most suitable for equivalence with the full-scale fatigue testing, with only a 9.7% difference in the fatigue life testing results. The difference between the applied mean stress and the actual transverse welding residual stress under various fatigue testing strategies is the key factor affecting the equivalence of the fatigue testing results.

考虑焊接残余应力影响的 X65 钢导管立管小尺寸试样疲劳测试策略
为了使用小尺寸试样准确评估全尺寸深水钢质导管立管(SCR)的疲劳性能,考虑到焊接残余应力的影响,探索了六种疲劳测试策略。通过与全尺寸共振弯曲疲劳测试结果的比较,确定了使用小尺寸试样的最等效策略。结果表明,与全尺寸试样相比,恒定应力测试策略低估了疲劳寿命;同时,低应力比测试策略获得的疲劳寿命值较高,尤其是在低应力范围区域。相比之下,未切割的 100 毫米宽试样在高应力范围区域的疲劳寿命更高。使用 25 毫米宽焊接接头试样的可变平均施加应力策略最适合与全尺寸疲劳测试等效,疲劳寿命测试结果仅相差 9.7%。各种疲劳测试策略下施加的平均应力与实际横向焊接残余应力之间的差异是影响疲劳测试结果等效性的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
256
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS) encompasses the broad topic of structural integrity which is founded on the mechanics of fatigue and fracture, and is concerned with the reliability and effectiveness of various materials and structural components of any scale or geometry. The editors publish original contributions that will stimulate the intellectual innovation that generates elegant, effective and economic engineering designs. The journal is interdisciplinary and includes papers from scientists and engineers in the fields of materials science, mechanics, physics, chemistry, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信