Towards care-full co-design with older adults: A feminist posthuman praxis

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Helen Manchester , Alice Willatt
{"title":"Towards care-full co-design with older adults: A feminist posthuman praxis","authors":"Helen Manchester ,&nbsp;Alice Willatt","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gerontechnology design is often rooted in deficit imaginaries of frail ageing bodies, with little consideration given to the sociomateriality of older adults' everyday lives, as shaped by complex social, political, historical and cultural forces. While co-design approaches have gone some way in supporting the participation of older adults, little attention has been given to how design processes can be responsive to the more-than-human lived materialities of older adults' everyday lives. More generally, there is also a need for deeper ethical engagement with the more-than-human assemblages that shape the politics and practices of co-design. In response, this article sketches out a feminist posthuman praxis of care-full co-design, grounding it in our work co-designing digital cultural experiences with older adults who live along multiple axes of inequality. Drawing on the radically deconstructive and reconstructive commitments of posthuman feminism, the discussion tentatively presents three interconnected threads of care-full co-design. These threads explore our attempts to design in the ‘thick present’, ground design in older adults' more-than-human everyday lives, and negotiate care-full (re)arrangements in the collective doing of design. The threads call for response-ability to expansive timescales and structural injustices, and to the situated knowledges and multi-sensual lifeworlds of older adults. Design is understood as an emergent process of attentive experimentation and adjustment in a bid to find a suitable arrangement of bodies, knowledges, technologies, emotions, languages, design sites and objects. We focus on particular practice-ings, tensions and challenges that emerged as we negotiated our care-full praxis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000458/pdfft?md5=d07f0aaf76e8a8ce73f41753364094e4&pid=1-s2.0-S0890406524000458-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gerontechnology design is often rooted in deficit imaginaries of frail ageing bodies, with little consideration given to the sociomateriality of older adults' everyday lives, as shaped by complex social, political, historical and cultural forces. While co-design approaches have gone some way in supporting the participation of older adults, little attention has been given to how design processes can be responsive to the more-than-human lived materialities of older adults' everyday lives. More generally, there is also a need for deeper ethical engagement with the more-than-human assemblages that shape the politics and practices of co-design. In response, this article sketches out a feminist posthuman praxis of care-full co-design, grounding it in our work co-designing digital cultural experiences with older adults who live along multiple axes of inequality. Drawing on the radically deconstructive and reconstructive commitments of posthuman feminism, the discussion tentatively presents three interconnected threads of care-full co-design. These threads explore our attempts to design in the ‘thick present’, ground design in older adults' more-than-human everyday lives, and negotiate care-full (re)arrangements in the collective doing of design. The threads call for response-ability to expansive timescales and structural injustices, and to the situated knowledges and multi-sensual lifeworlds of older adults. Design is understood as an emergent process of attentive experimentation and adjustment in a bid to find a suitable arrangement of bodies, knowledges, technologies, emotions, languages, design sites and objects. We focus on particular practice-ings, tensions and challenges that emerged as we negotiated our care-full praxis.

与老年人共同设计,实现全面关爱:女性主义后人类实践
老年技术设计往往植根于对虚弱老龄化身体的缺陷想象,很少考虑到老年人日常生活的社会物质性,而这种物质性是由复杂的社会、政治、历史和文化力量形成的。虽然共同设计方法在一定程度上支持了老年人的参与,但很少有人关注设计过程如何对老年人日常生活中的非人类物质生活作出反应。从更广泛的意义上讲,我们还需要从伦理的角度更深入地探讨形成共同设计的政治和实践的超人类组合。作为回应,本文勾勒了一种女性主义的 "充分关爱 "共同设计的后人类实践,将其建立在我们与生活在多重不平等轴线上的老年人共同设计数字文化体验的工作基础之上。讨论借鉴了后人类女性主义的彻底解构和重构承诺,初步提出了充分关爱共同设计的三条相互关联的主线。这些主线探讨了我们在 "厚重的当下 "进行设计的尝试,将设计植根于老年人超越人类的日常生活中,并在集体进行设计的过程中协商全护理(重新)安排。这些主线要求我们能够对广阔的时间尺度和结构性不公正做出反应,并对老年人的情景知识和多感性生活世界做出反应。设计被理解为一个不断涌现的试验和调整过程,目的是找到身体、知识、技术、情感、语言、设计场所和物品的适当安排。我们重点关注在我们的全护理实践中出现的特殊实践、紧张关系和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信