Assessing the role of forest resources in improving rural livelihoods in West Bengal of India

Q1 Social Sciences
Soumen Bisui , Pravat Kumar Shit
{"title":"Assessing the role of forest resources in improving rural livelihoods in West Bengal of India","authors":"Soumen Bisui ,&nbsp;Pravat Kumar Shit","doi":"10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forest resources play a vital role in supporting the livelihoods of rural communities residing in forest-rich areas. In India, a forest-rich country, a significant proportion of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) is consumed locally, supporting numerous rural communities relying on forests for essential resources, such as firewood, timber, and NTFPs. This study focuses on two forest-dominant districts in West Bengal of India, namely, Jhargram District and Paschim Medinipur District. Furthermore, this study aims to enhance the understanding of forest-dependent communities by comparing the standard of living among different village classes. Thus, we categorized villages into three classes based on the distance from home to forests, including inner villages, fringe villages, and outer villages. Through focus group discussions and household surveys, we explored the sources of local economy, income sources of household, and reasons for economic diversification in different village classes. The study findings confirm that substantial variations existed in the income sources and the standard of living in these villages. Forest income varied dramatically among the three village classes, with inner villages having greater forest income than fringe villages and outer villages. Meanwhile, households in outer villages depended on forests and engaged in diverse economic activities for their livelihoods. Compared with inner and fringe villages, households in outer villages derived a significant portion of their income from livestock. This discrepancy can be attributed to challenges, such as inadequate transportation, communication, and underdeveloped market chains in inner villages. Moreover, these findings emphasize the need to develop sustainable forest management practices, create alternative income-generation opportunities, and improve infrastructure and market access in inner villages, as well as promote economic diversification in outer villages. Through targeted policy measures, these forest-rich regions can achieve improved livelihoods, enhanced standard of living, and increased resilience for their communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34395,"journal":{"name":"Regional Sustainability","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666660X24000409/pdfft?md5=651ba0ccbc27b77afb6df4fa8ab4bf96&pid=1-s2.0-S2666660X24000409-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666660X24000409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest resources play a vital role in supporting the livelihoods of rural communities residing in forest-rich areas. In India, a forest-rich country, a significant proportion of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) is consumed locally, supporting numerous rural communities relying on forests for essential resources, such as firewood, timber, and NTFPs. This study focuses on two forest-dominant districts in West Bengal of India, namely, Jhargram District and Paschim Medinipur District. Furthermore, this study aims to enhance the understanding of forest-dependent communities by comparing the standard of living among different village classes. Thus, we categorized villages into three classes based on the distance from home to forests, including inner villages, fringe villages, and outer villages. Through focus group discussions and household surveys, we explored the sources of local economy, income sources of household, and reasons for economic diversification in different village classes. The study findings confirm that substantial variations existed in the income sources and the standard of living in these villages. Forest income varied dramatically among the three village classes, with inner villages having greater forest income than fringe villages and outer villages. Meanwhile, households in outer villages depended on forests and engaged in diverse economic activities for their livelihoods. Compared with inner and fringe villages, households in outer villages derived a significant portion of their income from livestock. This discrepancy can be attributed to challenges, such as inadequate transportation, communication, and underdeveloped market chains in inner villages. Moreover, these findings emphasize the need to develop sustainable forest management practices, create alternative income-generation opportunities, and improve infrastructure and market access in inner villages, as well as promote economic diversification in outer villages. Through targeted policy measures, these forest-rich regions can achieve improved livelihoods, enhanced standard of living, and increased resilience for their communities.

评估森林资源在改善印度西孟加拉邦农村生计中的作用
森林资源在支持居住在森林资源丰富地区的农村社区的生计方面发挥着至关重要的作用。印度是一个森林资源丰富的国家,很大一部分非木材森林产品(NTFP)在当地消费,支持着众多依赖森林获取柴火、木材和非木材森林产品等基本资源的农村社区。本研究重点关注印度西孟加拉邦两个以森林为主的县,即 Jhargram 县和 Paschim Medinipur 县。此外,本研究旨在通过比较不同村庄等级的生活水平,加深对以森林为生的社区的了解。因此,我们根据村庄到森林的距离将村庄分为三个等级,包括内部村庄、边缘村庄和外部村庄。通过焦点小组讨论和住户调查,我们探讨了不同村庄等级的地方经济来源、家庭收入来源和经济多样化的原因。研究结果证实,这些村庄的收入来源和生活水平存在很大差异。三个村级的森林收入差异巨大,内村的森林收入高于边缘村和外村。同时,外围村庄的家庭依赖森林并从事多种经济活动来维持生计。与内村和边缘村相比,外村家庭的大部分收入来自牲畜。这种差异可归因于内村面临的挑战,如交通、通讯不发达以及市场链欠发达。此外,这些研究结果强调了发展可持续森林管理实践、创造其他创收机会、改善内村基础设施和市场准入以及促进外村经济多样化的必要性。通过有针对性的政策措施,这些森林资源丰富的地区可以改善生计,提高生活水平,并增强社区的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regional Sustainability
Regional Sustainability Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信