‘Bandits’ and machete gangs: The criminalization of artisanal and small-scale mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sarah Katz-Lavigne , Grasian Mkodzongi , Mark Nyandoro
{"title":"‘Bandits’ and machete gangs: The criminalization of artisanal and small-scale mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe","authors":"Sarah Katz-Lavigne ,&nbsp;Grasian Mkodzongi ,&nbsp;Mark Nyandoro","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholars have examined the often ‘illegal’ status of artisanal and small-scale miners in Africa from a range of perspectives. Yet there is scope for further research on understandings of this ‘illegal’ character, which do not only include violations of the national legal framework for mining, but are also linked to broader (perceived) matters of criminality; miners themselves are also at times victims of ‘banditry’ and criminality. We apply a criminalization framework to analyse how artisanal miners are not only seen as ‘illegal’ for their non-state-sanctioned artisanal mining activities or for ‘trespassing’ on mining companies’ concessions – often overlooked or even tacitly accepted as legitimate in a range of contexts – but frequently also perceived as criminal as perpetrators of other infractions such as theft or violence. Drawing on case studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe, we lay out the need to unpack the conceptual blurring between artisanal mining, and ‘criminal bands’ and actors who use violence, at theoretical and empirical levels. We argue that there is a need for additional research on the scale and scope of the phenomenon of (urban) criminality and how this phenomenon relates to (but is not reducible to), and intermingles with, artisanal small-scale mining.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have examined the often ‘illegal’ status of artisanal and small-scale miners in Africa from a range of perspectives. Yet there is scope for further research on understandings of this ‘illegal’ character, which do not only include violations of the national legal framework for mining, but are also linked to broader (perceived) matters of criminality; miners themselves are also at times victims of ‘banditry’ and criminality. We apply a criminalization framework to analyse how artisanal miners are not only seen as ‘illegal’ for their non-state-sanctioned artisanal mining activities or for ‘trespassing’ on mining companies’ concessions – often overlooked or even tacitly accepted as legitimate in a range of contexts – but frequently also perceived as criminal as perpetrators of other infractions such as theft or violence. Drawing on case studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe, we lay out the need to unpack the conceptual blurring between artisanal mining, and ‘criminal bands’ and actors who use violence, at theoretical and empirical levels. We argue that there is a need for additional research on the scale and scope of the phenomenon of (urban) criminality and how this phenomenon relates to (but is not reducible to), and intermingles with, artisanal small-scale mining.

土匪 "和砍刀帮:刚果民主共和国和津巴布韦手工和小规模采矿的刑事定罪
学者们从不同角度研究了非洲手工和小规模矿工通常的 "非法 "地位。然而,对这种 "非法 "性质的理解仍有进一步研究的余地,这种 "非法 "性质不仅包括违反国家采矿法律框架的行为,还与更广泛的(被认为的)犯罪问题相关联;矿工本身有时也是 "强盗行为 "和犯罪的受害者。我们运用犯罪化框架来分析手工采矿者如何不仅因其未经国家批准的手工采矿活动或 "侵入 "矿业公司的特许矿区而被视为 "非法"--在各种情况下,这些活动往往被忽视或甚至被默认为合法--而且还经常被视为其他违法行为(如盗窃或暴力)的犯罪者。通过对刚果民主共和国和津巴布韦的案例研究,我们提出有必要从理论和实证的层面来解释手工采矿与 "犯罪团伙 "和使用暴力的行为者之间概念模糊的问题。我们认为,有必要对(城市)犯罪现象的规模和范围,以及这一现象如何与(但不能归结为)手工小规模采矿相联系、相混合进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信