Cirugía citorreductora radical y quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica en el tratamiento de la sarcomatosis peritoneal: resultados de un centro referente y reflexiones sobre la evidencia actual

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Francisco Cristóbal Muñoz Casares , Francisco Javier Padillo Ruiz , Carlos González de Pedro , José Gómez Barbadillo , Javier Martín Broto , Francisco Almoguera González , Daniel Díaz Gómez , Juan Ángel Fernández-Hernández , José Antonio González López , José Manuel Asencio Pascual
{"title":"Cirugía citorreductora radical y quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica en el tratamiento de la sarcomatosis peritoneal: resultados de un centro referente y reflexiones sobre la evidencia actual","authors":"Francisco Cristóbal Muñoz Casares ,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Padillo Ruiz ,&nbsp;Carlos González de Pedro ,&nbsp;José Gómez Barbadillo ,&nbsp;Javier Martín Broto ,&nbsp;Francisco Almoguera González ,&nbsp;Daniel Díaz Gómez ,&nbsp;Juan Ángel Fernández-Hernández ,&nbsp;José Antonio González López ,&nbsp;José Manuel Asencio Pascual","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare disease, with multiple histological origins and poor overall prognosis. The option of radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The results of a surgical team experienced in these procedures are analyzed and discussed based on the available evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Study on a prospective database of patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis who underwent CRS and HIPEC, from 2016 to 2022, in a national reference center for sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery, who met the established inclusion/exclusion criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-three patients were included in the study, with a median age of 53 years (6-68). Recurrent/persistent clinical presentation predominated (78.3%). Visceral origin (including GIST and non-GIST peritoneal) accounted for 47.8% of patients, compared to 43.5% uterine and 8.7% retroperitoneal. The median PCI was 17 (3-36), with CC0 cytoreduction of 87%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo Clavien III-IV) of 13%, with no postoperative mortality in the series. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years were 64.6% and 34.5%, respectively. Histological grade was the most influential prognostic factor for survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the series, with low morbidity, support the benefit of radical peritoneal oncological surgery in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis after adequate selection, as long as it is performed in high-volume centers, experienced surgeons and expert multidisciplinary teams. However, the role of HIPEC remains to be demonstrated and pending future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X24001295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Peritoneal sarcomatosis is a rare disease, with multiple histological origins and poor overall prognosis. The option of radical cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The results of a surgical team experienced in these procedures are analyzed and discussed based on the available evidence.

Methods

Study on a prospective database of patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis who underwent CRS and HIPEC, from 2016 to 2022, in a national reference center for sarcomas and peritoneal oncological surgery, who met the established inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Results

Twenty-three patients were included in the study, with a median age of 53 years (6-68). Recurrent/persistent clinical presentation predominated (78.3%). Visceral origin (including GIST and non-GIST peritoneal) accounted for 47.8% of patients, compared to 43.5% uterine and 8.7% retroperitoneal. The median PCI was 17 (3-36), with CC0 cytoreduction of 87%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo Clavien III-IV) of 13%, with no postoperative mortality in the series. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years were 64.6% and 34.5%, respectively. Histological grade was the most influential prognostic factor for survival.

Conclusions

The results of the series, with low morbidity, support the benefit of radical peritoneal oncological surgery in patients with peritoneal sarcomatosis after adequate selection, as long as it is performed in high-volume centers, experienced surgeons and expert multidisciplinary teams. However, the role of HIPEC remains to be demonstrated and pending future studies.

Abstract Image

治疗腹膜肉瘤病的根治性细胞切除手术和腹腔内热化疗:一家转诊中心的结果和对现有证据的反思
导言腹膜肉瘤病是一种罕见疾病,有多种组织学起源,总体预后较差。根治性细胞切除手术(CRS)与热疗腹腔化疗(HIPEC)的选择存在争议。方法对2016年至2022年期间在国家肉瘤和腹膜肿瘤外科参考中心接受CRS和HIPEC治疗的腹膜肉瘤病患者的前瞻性数据库进行研究,这些患者符合既定的纳入/排除标准。临床表现以复发性/持续性为主(78.3%)。内脏来源(包括GIST和非GIST腹膜来源)的患者占47.8%,而子宫来源和腹膜后来源的患者分别占43.5%和8.7%。PCI中位数为17(3-36),CC0细胞减少率为87%。术后发病率(Dindo Clavien III-IV)为 13%,系列手术中无术后死亡病例。5年总生存率和无病生存率分别为64.6%和34.5%。结论该系列研究结果支持腹膜肿瘤根治术对腹膜肉瘤病患者的益处,只要在大容量中心、经验丰富的外科医生和专业的多学科团队中进行,经过充分筛选后,腹膜肿瘤根治术的发病率较低。不过,腹腔内癌根治术的作用仍有待证明,有待今后的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cirugia Espanola
Cirugia Espanola SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信