Fire refugia patch dynamics differ between prescribed fires and wildfires in longleaf pine savanna

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
{"title":"Fire refugia patch dynamics differ between prescribed fires and wildfires in longleaf pine savanna","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing wildfire activity has spurred an increasing push for the application of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire risk while simultaneously acting as a surrogate for fire’s historical role as a fundamental ecosystem process. However, prescribed fires are often ignited using uniform ignitions to maintain operational control and there are concerns that they may not be able to replicate the landscape heterogeneity, particularly patterns in unburned patches, generated by historical fires. Fire refugia, unburned areas within fire perimeters, play an integral role in determining post-fire recovery and community structure. We assess patterns in fire refugia across 443 large (&gt;200 ha) wildfire and prescribed fire perimeters using remotely sensed fire severity data in longleaf pine (<em>Pinus palustris</em>) savannas of the Florida Panhandle. Contrary to concerns, large prescribed fires had a significantly greater proportion of unburned area than wildfires, driven by larger refugia patch sizes. Drier conditions promoted smaller and more numerous fire refugia patches. Our study demonstrates differences in wildfires versus prescribed fire outcomes on landscape structure, with implications for future longleaf pine savanna management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing wildfire activity has spurred an increasing push for the application of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire risk while simultaneously acting as a surrogate for fire’s historical role as a fundamental ecosystem process. However, prescribed fires are often ignited using uniform ignitions to maintain operational control and there are concerns that they may not be able to replicate the landscape heterogeneity, particularly patterns in unburned patches, generated by historical fires. Fire refugia, unburned areas within fire perimeters, play an integral role in determining post-fire recovery and community structure. We assess patterns in fire refugia across 443 large (>200 ha) wildfire and prescribed fire perimeters using remotely sensed fire severity data in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) savannas of the Florida Panhandle. Contrary to concerns, large prescribed fires had a significantly greater proportion of unburned area than wildfires, driven by larger refugia patch sizes. Drier conditions promoted smaller and more numerous fire refugia patches. Our study demonstrates differences in wildfires versus prescribed fire outcomes on landscape structure, with implications for future longleaf pine savanna management.

长叶松稀树草原中规定用火与野火之间的火源补给区动态差异
野火活动的日益频繁促使人们越来越多地使用规定火种来降低野火风险,同时替代火灾作为基本生态系统过程的历史作用。然而,为了保持操作控制,规定用火通常采用统一点火的方式,因此有人担心它们可能无法复制历史火灾所产生的景观异质性,特别是未燃烧斑块的模式。火灾避难区(火灾周边的未燃烧区域)在决定火灾后的恢复和群落结构方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。我们利用遥感火灾严重程度数据,评估了佛罗里达州潘汉德尔地区长叶松稀树草原中 443 个大型(200 公顷)野火和处方火周边地区的防火保护区模式。与人们担心的情况相反,与野火相比,大型规定火灾的未燃烧面积比例要大得多,这是因为避难区的面积更大。更干燥的条件会使火灾避难区面积更小、数量更多。我们的研究表明,野火与野火对景观结构的影响存在差异,这对未来长叶松稀树草原的管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信