Empirical analysis of solid biomass fuel and ill-health

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Edward Martey , Prince M. Etwire , Ralph Armah , Ralph Essem Nordjo
{"title":"Empirical analysis of solid biomass fuel and ill-health","authors":"Edward Martey ,&nbsp;Prince M. Etwire ,&nbsp;Ralph Armah ,&nbsp;Ralph Essem Nordjo","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) seven highlights the need to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. Improving access to reliable and affordable modern energy for cooking have far-reaching benefits on human health and the environment. In most developing countries, the use of solid biomass fuel (SBF) for cooking is widespread. Using a nationally representative household-level data from Ghana and the biprobit model, this paper examines the relationship between SBF and ill-health. The first stage results show that the adoption of SBF is significantly influenced by socio-economic factors, rental and dwelling status, food hardship, information about SBF, and geographical controls. The adoption of SBF for cooking increases the probability of a household reporting ill-health and frequently reporting ill-health by 25% each, respectively. The differential analysis indicates that charcoal has a moderate effect on ill-health relative to using wood as fuel for cooking. The findings of the study imply that households are more likely to improve their health with increasing affordability and use of clean cooking fuels. Government programs on the promotion of clean energy fuels must be intensified and make more accessible and affordable to households.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100437"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001053/pdfft?md5=b2faeb1f00473ae57f81630b3f6aee74&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724001053-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) seven highlights the need to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. Improving access to reliable and affordable modern energy for cooking have far-reaching benefits on human health and the environment. In most developing countries, the use of solid biomass fuel (SBF) for cooking is widespread. Using a nationally representative household-level data from Ghana and the biprobit model, this paper examines the relationship between SBF and ill-health. The first stage results show that the adoption of SBF is significantly influenced by socio-economic factors, rental and dwelling status, food hardship, information about SBF, and geographical controls. The adoption of SBF for cooking increases the probability of a household reporting ill-health and frequently reporting ill-health by 25% each, respectively. The differential analysis indicates that charcoal has a moderate effect on ill-health relative to using wood as fuel for cooking. The findings of the study imply that households are more likely to improve their health with increasing affordability and use of clean cooking fuels. Government programs on the promotion of clean energy fuels must be intensified and make more accessible and affordable to households.

固体生物质燃料与不健康的经验分析
可持续发展目标(SDG)七强调,必须确保人人都能获得负担得起、可靠、可持续的现代能源。改善可靠和负担得起的现代烹饪能源的获取,对人类健康和环境具有深远的益处。在大多数发展中国家,使用固体生物质燃料(SBF)做饭的现象非常普遍。本文利用加纳具有全国代表性的家庭数据和双比特模型,研究了 SBF 与不健康之间的关系。第一阶段的结果显示,采用 SBF 受社会经济因素、租房和居住状况、食物困难、有关 SBF 的信息以及地理控制因素的显著影响。采用 SBF 做饭会使家庭报告健康状况不佳和经常报告健康状况不佳的概率分别增加 25%。差异分析表明,相对于使用木材作为烹饪燃料,木炭对健康状况不佳的影响适中。研究结果表明,随着清洁烹饪燃料的价格和使用率的提高,家庭更有可能改善其健康状况。政府必须加强推广清洁能源燃料的计划,使家庭更容易获得并负担得起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信