The Relationship Between Intimate Partner Violence Policing and Family Surveillance in Large U.S. Counties

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Sandhya Kajeepeta, Lisa M. Bates, Katherine M. Keyes, Zinzi D. Bailey, Dorothy E. Roberts, Seth J. Prins
{"title":"The Relationship Between Intimate Partner Violence Policing and Family Surveillance in Large U.S. Counties","authors":"Sandhya Kajeepeta, Lisa M. Bates, Katherine M. Keyes, Zinzi D. Bailey, Dorothy E. Roberts, Seth J. Prins","doi":"10.1007/s12552-024-09422-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For decades, policing has been the primary response to intimate partner violence (IPV) in the U.S. despite mixed evidence of its effectiveness and potential harmful consequences of policing for survivors and their families. This is the first study to examine the relationship between IPV policing (i.e., percentage of police-reported IPV incidents resulting in arrest) and family surveillance (i.e., child maltreatment report rates) at the county level. We hypothesized that family surveillance would be a harmful and racialized consequence of IPV policing because of direct coordination between police and family surveillance systems and the increased risk of child welfare intervention associated with parental arrest. Utilizing National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and FBI National Incident-Based Reporting System data from 160 large U.S. counties (2000–2019), we used Poisson regression and modeled between- and within-county effects with overall and race-specific outcome data. We also conducted an interaction analysis by the percentage of Black residents in the county to assess differences by racialized groups and within different racialized contexts because policing and family surveillance systems disproportionately impact Black families. We found no overall association between the percentage of police-reported IPV incidents that resulted in arrest and child maltreatment report rate at the county level (RR = 1.004, 95% CI: 0.965, 1.044). However, the percentage of police-reported IPV incidents that resulted in arrest was positively associated with the Black child maltreatment report rate in large counties with a below-average percentage of Black residents (RR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.006, 1.021). This study provides initial evidence that family surveillance is a harmful consequence of IPV policing specifically for Black families living in predominantly white counties. Findings should be considered when evaluating the U.S.’s heavy reliance on policing to respond to IPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":46715,"journal":{"name":"Race and Social Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race and Social Problems","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-024-09422-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, policing has been the primary response to intimate partner violence (IPV) in the U.S. despite mixed evidence of its effectiveness and potential harmful consequences of policing for survivors and their families. This is the first study to examine the relationship between IPV policing (i.e., percentage of police-reported IPV incidents resulting in arrest) and family surveillance (i.e., child maltreatment report rates) at the county level. We hypothesized that family surveillance would be a harmful and racialized consequence of IPV policing because of direct coordination between police and family surveillance systems and the increased risk of child welfare intervention associated with parental arrest. Utilizing National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and FBI National Incident-Based Reporting System data from 160 large U.S. counties (2000–2019), we used Poisson regression and modeled between- and within-county effects with overall and race-specific outcome data. We also conducted an interaction analysis by the percentage of Black residents in the county to assess differences by racialized groups and within different racialized contexts because policing and family surveillance systems disproportionately impact Black families. We found no overall association between the percentage of police-reported IPV incidents that resulted in arrest and child maltreatment report rate at the county level (RR = 1.004, 95% CI: 0.965, 1.044). However, the percentage of police-reported IPV incidents that resulted in arrest was positively associated with the Black child maltreatment report rate in large counties with a below-average percentage of Black residents (RR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.006, 1.021). This study provides initial evidence that family surveillance is a harmful consequence of IPV policing specifically for Black families living in predominantly white counties. Findings should be considered when evaluating the U.S.’s heavy reliance on policing to respond to IPV.

Abstract Image

美国大郡亲密伴侣暴力警务与家庭监控之间的关系
数十年来,在美国,维持治安一直是应对亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 的主要措施,尽管有证据表明维持治安的有效性参差不齐,而且维持治安可能会对幸存者及其家庭造成有害影响。这是第一项在县一级研究 IPV 治安(即警方报告的 IPV 事件中导致逮捕的百分比)与家庭监控(即儿童虐待报告率)之间关系的研究。我们假设,由于警方与家庭监控系统之间的直接协调,以及与父母被捕相关的儿童福利干预风险的增加,家庭监控将成为 IPV 治安的一个有害的种族化后果。利用美国国家虐待和忽视儿童数据系统(National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System)和联邦调查局全国事件报告系统(FBI National Incident-Based Reporting System)提供的美国 160 个大县的数据(2000-2019 年),我们采用泊松回归法,并利用总体和特定种族的结果数据对县与县之间以及县内的影响进行了建模。我们还根据县内黑人居民的比例进行了交互分析,以评估不同种族群体和不同种族背景下的差异,因为治安和家庭监控系统对黑人家庭的影响尤为严重。我们发现,在县一级,警方报告的导致逮捕的 IPV 事件百分比与儿童虐待报告率之间总体上没有关联(RR = 1.004,95% CI:0.965, 1.044)。然而,在黑人居民比例低于平均水平的大县,警方报告的导致逮捕的 IPV 事件百分比与黑人儿童虐待报告率呈正相关(RR = 1.013,95% CI:1.006, 1.021)。本研究提供了初步证据,证明家庭监控是 IPV 治安的有害后果,特别是对生活在白人占多数的县的黑人家庭而言。在评估美国严重依赖治安来应对 IPV 时,应考虑到研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Race and Social Problems (RASP) provides a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussion of issues germane to race and its enduring relationship to socioeconomic, psychological, political, and cultural problems. The journal publishes original empirical studies, reviews of past research, theoretical studies, and invited essays that advance the understanding of the complexities of race and its relationship to social problems.  Submissions from the fields of social work, anthropology, communications, criminology, economics, history, law, political science, psychology, public health, and sociology are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信