Influence of crop-livestock integration on direct and indirect contributions of beef systems to food security

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
C. Battheu-Noirfalise , A. Mertens , H. Soyeurt , D. Stilmant , E. Froidmont , Y. Beckers
{"title":"Influence of crop-livestock integration on direct and indirect contributions of beef systems to food security","authors":"C. Battheu-Noirfalise ,&nbsp;A. Mertens ,&nbsp;H. Soyeurt ,&nbsp;D. Stilmant ,&nbsp;E. Froidmont ,&nbsp;Y. Beckers","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Beef production systems have been criticized for their low conversion efficiency of the human-edible feed and the agricultural land they use, impacting their ability to contribute directly to food security. However, beef cattle can also contribute indirectly to food security by transferring nutrients from permanent grasslands to marketed food crops through manure.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>The objective was to analyze the relations between direct and indirect contributions to food security and assess these two aspects for Walloon beef farms. We hypothesized that crop-livestock integration was positively associated with both contributions.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We calculated indicators of direct and indirect contributions to food security and crop-livestock integration on farm accounting data of 73 Walloon beef farms. The direct contribution was represented with the net productivity, while the indirect contribution to food security was represented with two indicators. The first was the share of exported manure from the livestock subsystem to marketed crops. However, as this manure could be produced out of imported nitrogen, we calculated a nitrogen balance where natural N deposition and fixations are not taken into account, which enables a negative N surplus representing a “net” nitrogen export from livestock towards marketed crops. We calculated correlation coefficients between all indicators and performed a clustering on the indicators of food security contribution, at farm and livestock subsystem levels.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>While the livestock subsystem of two farm types out of five did not contribute positively to food security, the presence of marketed crops resulted in a positive net productivity at farm level. In term of indirect contribution to food security, the share of marketed crops was linked with a higher share of exported manure. However, the higher the share of exported manure, the higher the N surplus of the livestock subsystem implying that the manure is produced out of imported nitrogen sources and not from the valorization of permanent grasslands' fertility. The indicators of crop-livestock integration were mainly associated with a low N surplus but the intra-consumption of crops was negatively associated with net productivity.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Although they can provide manure to marketed crops, current beef cattle use imported N sources to do so and do not always contribute directly to food security. Those performances could be enhanced by combining a grass-based beef cattle subsystem that is self-sufficient in N and intra-consumes small amounts of crops with a marketed crops subsystem that uses manure exported from the livestock subsystem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104067"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Beef production systems have been criticized for their low conversion efficiency of the human-edible feed and the agricultural land they use, impacting their ability to contribute directly to food security. However, beef cattle can also contribute indirectly to food security by transferring nutrients from permanent grasslands to marketed food crops through manure.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to analyze the relations between direct and indirect contributions to food security and assess these two aspects for Walloon beef farms. We hypothesized that crop-livestock integration was positively associated with both contributions.

METHODS

We calculated indicators of direct and indirect contributions to food security and crop-livestock integration on farm accounting data of 73 Walloon beef farms. The direct contribution was represented with the net productivity, while the indirect contribution to food security was represented with two indicators. The first was the share of exported manure from the livestock subsystem to marketed crops. However, as this manure could be produced out of imported nitrogen, we calculated a nitrogen balance where natural N deposition and fixations are not taken into account, which enables a negative N surplus representing a “net” nitrogen export from livestock towards marketed crops. We calculated correlation coefficients between all indicators and performed a clustering on the indicators of food security contribution, at farm and livestock subsystem levels.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

While the livestock subsystem of two farm types out of five did not contribute positively to food security, the presence of marketed crops resulted in a positive net productivity at farm level. In term of indirect contribution to food security, the share of marketed crops was linked with a higher share of exported manure. However, the higher the share of exported manure, the higher the N surplus of the livestock subsystem implying that the manure is produced out of imported nitrogen sources and not from the valorization of permanent grasslands' fertility. The indicators of crop-livestock integration were mainly associated with a low N surplus but the intra-consumption of crops was negatively associated with net productivity.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although they can provide manure to marketed crops, current beef cattle use imported N sources to do so and do not always contribute directly to food security. Those performances could be enhanced by combining a grass-based beef cattle subsystem that is self-sufficient in N and intra-consumes small amounts of crops with a marketed crops subsystem that uses manure exported from the livestock subsystem.

Abstract Image

作物-牲畜一体化对牛肉系统对粮食安全的直接和间接贡献的影响
牛肉生产系统因其使用的人类可食用饲料和农业用地的转化效率低而受到批评,影响了其直接促进粮食安全的能力。然而,肉牛也可以通过粪便将养分从永久草地转移到上市的粮食作物上,从而间接促进粮食安全。我们的目标是分析对粮食安全的直接贡献和间接贡献之间的关系,并对瓦隆牛肉农场的这两个方面进行评估。我们假设作物-畜牧业一体化与这两方面的贡献呈正相关。我们根据 73 个瓦隆牛肉农场的农场会计数据,计算了对粮食安全和作物-牲畜一体化的直接和间接贡献指标。直接贡献用净生产率表示,而对粮食安全的间接贡献则用两个指标表示。第一个指标是畜牧业子系统出口的粪肥在市场销售作物中所占的比例。不过,由于这些粪便可能是利用进口氮生产的,因此我们在计算氮平衡时未考虑自然氮沉积和固定的因素,这样就出现了负的氮盈余,代表了从牲畜向市场作物的 "净 "氮输出。我们计算了所有指标之间的相关系数,并在农场和畜牧子系统层面对粮食安全贡献指标进行了聚类。五个农场中有两个农场的牲畜子系统没有对粮食安全做出积极贡献,而上市作物的存在则在农场层面产生了积极的净生产率。就对粮食安全的间接贡献而言,上市作物的份额与较高的粪肥出口份额相关。然而,出口粪肥的比例越高,畜牧子系统的氮盈余就越高,这意味着粪肥是通过进口氮源生产的,而不是通过对永久草地肥力的估价生产的。作物-牲畜一体化指标主要与低氮盈余有关,但作物的内部消耗与净生产率呈负相关。虽然肉牛可以为市场上的农作物提供肥料,但目前肉牛使用进口的氮源来提供肥料,并不总能直接促进粮食安全。如果将氮自给自足、内部消耗少量作物的草地肉牛子系统与使用从畜牧子系统输出的粪肥的上市作物子系统结合起来,就能提高这些性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信