The Dichoptic Contrast Ordering Test: A method for measuring the depth of binocular imbalance

Alex S Baldwin, Marie-Celine Lorenzini, Annabel Wing-Yan Fan, Robert F Hess, Alexandre Reynaud
{"title":"The Dichoptic Contrast Ordering Test: A method for measuring the depth of binocular imbalance","authors":"Alex S Baldwin, Marie-Celine Lorenzini, Annabel Wing-Yan Fan, Robert F Hess, Alexandre Reynaud","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.05.24311503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In binocular vision, the relative strength of the input from the two eyes can have significant functional impact. These inputs are typically balanced, however in some conditions (e.g. amblyopia) one eye will dominate over the other. To quantify imbalances in binocular vision, we have developed the Dichoptic Contrast Ordering Test (DiCOT). Implemented on a tablet device, the program uses rankings of perceived contrast (of dichoptically-presented stimuli) to find a scaling factor that balances the two eyes. We measured how physical interventions (applied to one eye) affect the DiCOT measurement. These were: i) neutral density filters, ii) Bangerter filters, and iii) optical blur introduced by a +3 D lens. The DiCOT results were compared to those from the Dichoptic Letter Test (DLT). Both the DiCOT and the DLT showed excellent test-retest reliability, however the magnitude of the imbalances introduced by the interventions was greater in the DLT. To find consistency between the methods, rescaling the DiCOT results from individual conditions gave good results. However, the adjustments needed for the +3 D lens condition were quite different from those for the ND and Bangerter filter. Our results indicate that the DiCOT and DLT measure partially separate aspects of binocular imbalance. This supports the simultaneous use of both measures in future studies.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24311503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In binocular vision, the relative strength of the input from the two eyes can have significant functional impact. These inputs are typically balanced, however in some conditions (e.g. amblyopia) one eye will dominate over the other. To quantify imbalances in binocular vision, we have developed the Dichoptic Contrast Ordering Test (DiCOT). Implemented on a tablet device, the program uses rankings of perceived contrast (of dichoptically-presented stimuli) to find a scaling factor that balances the two eyes. We measured how physical interventions (applied to one eye) affect the DiCOT measurement. These were: i) neutral density filters, ii) Bangerter filters, and iii) optical blur introduced by a +3 D lens. The DiCOT results were compared to those from the Dichoptic Letter Test (DLT). Both the DiCOT and the DLT showed excellent test-retest reliability, however the magnitude of the imbalances introduced by the interventions was greater in the DLT. To find consistency between the methods, rescaling the DiCOT results from individual conditions gave good results. However, the adjustments needed for the +3 D lens condition were quite different from those for the ND and Bangerter filter. Our results indicate that the DiCOT and DLT measure partially separate aspects of binocular imbalance. This supports the simultaneous use of both measures in future studies.
分色对比排序测试:测量双眼失衡深度的方法
在双眼视觉中,来自两只眼睛的输入的相对强度会对功能产生重大影响。这些输入通常是平衡的,但在某些情况下(如弱视),一只眼睛会支配另一只眼睛。为了量化双眼视觉的不平衡,我们开发了二分对比度排序测试(DiCOT)。该程序是在平板设备上实施的,它使用(二视刺激物的)感知对比度排序来找到平衡双眼视力的比例因子。我们测量了物理干预措施(应用于一只眼睛)对 DiCOT 测量的影响。这些干预措施包括:i) 中性密度滤光镜;ii) Bangerter 滤光镜;iii) +3 D 镜片带来的光学模糊。DiCOT 的结果与二分法字母测试 (DLT) 的结果进行了比较。DiCOT 和 DLT 都显示出极佳的测试重复可靠性,但在 DLT 中,干预措施造成的不平衡程度更大。为了找到两种方法之间的一致性,对个别条件下的 DiCOT 结果进行重新缩放得到了很好的结果。但是,+3 D 镜片条件下所需的调整与 ND 和 Bangerter 滤镜条件下所需的调整有很大不同。我们的结果表明,DiCOT 和 DLT 分别测量双眼失衡的部分不同方面。这支持在未来的研究中同时使用这两种测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信