Green Innovation and Energy Efficiency: Moderating Effect of Institutional Quality Based on the Threshold Model

Chaoyi Chen, Mehmet Pinar, Rocío Román-Collado
{"title":"Green Innovation and Energy Efficiency: Moderating Effect of Institutional Quality Based on the Threshold Model","authors":"Chaoyi Chen, Mehmet Pinar, Rocío Román-Collado","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00902-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent studies demonstrated that green innovation and environment-related technologies reduce energy intensity and improve energy efficiency, contributing to the reduction of carbon emissions. However, the existing studies employ linear estimation methods to examine the relationship between green innovation and energy intensity and do not consider the indirect implications of institutional quality for the effect of green technology on energy intensity. Institutional quality is found to be an essential driver of innovation, and countries may need to achieve at least a minimum level of institutional quality to promote green innovation and improve their energy intensity. To test this hypothesis, this paper examines the relationship between energy intensity and green innovation using a panel dataset from 72 countries between 1996 and 2017 and a panel threshold model when institutional quality is considered a threshold variable. The findings highlight that green innovation reduces the energy intensity if and only if countries surpass a certain threshold of institutional quality. Therefore, countries need to improve their institutional quality to promote green innovation and benefit from green technologies in improving their energy intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00902-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrated that green innovation and environment-related technologies reduce energy intensity and improve energy efficiency, contributing to the reduction of carbon emissions. However, the existing studies employ linear estimation methods to examine the relationship between green innovation and energy intensity and do not consider the indirect implications of institutional quality for the effect of green technology on energy intensity. Institutional quality is found to be an essential driver of innovation, and countries may need to achieve at least a minimum level of institutional quality to promote green innovation and improve their energy intensity. To test this hypothesis, this paper examines the relationship between energy intensity and green innovation using a panel dataset from 72 countries between 1996 and 2017 and a panel threshold model when institutional quality is considered a threshold variable. The findings highlight that green innovation reduces the energy intensity if and only if countries surpass a certain threshold of institutional quality. Therefore, countries need to improve their institutional quality to promote green innovation and benefit from green technologies in improving their energy intensity.

Abstract Image

绿色创新与能源效率:基于阈值模型的机构质量调节效应
最近的研究表明,绿色创新和环境相关技术降低了能源强度,提高了能源效率,有助于减少碳排放。然而,现有研究采用线性估计方法来考察绿色创新与能源强度之间的关系,并未考虑制度质量对绿色技术影响能源强度的间接影响。研究发现,制度质量是创新的基本驱动力,各国可能至少需要达到一定的制度质量水平,才能促进绿色创新,提高能源强度。为了验证这一假设,本文使用 1996 年至 2017 年 72 个国家的面板数据集,以及将制度质量视为门槛变量的面板门槛模型,研究了能源强度与绿色创新之间的关系。研究结果表明,如果且只有当国家的制度质量超过一定门槛时,绿色创新才会降低能源强度。因此,各国需要提高制度质量,以促进绿色创新,并从绿色技术中获益,从而提高能源强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信