Health care utilization of patients with acute abdominal pain before and after emergency department visits

Katharina Verleger, Antje Fischer-Rosinsky, Martin Möckel, Anna Schneider, Anna Slagman, Thomas Keil, Liane Schenk
{"title":"Health care utilization of patients with acute abdominal pain before and after emergency department visits","authors":"Katharina Verleger, Antje Fischer-Rosinsky, Martin Möckel, Anna Schneider, Anna Slagman, Thomas Keil, Liane Schenk","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01237-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is a major driver for capacity-use in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide. Yet, the health care utilization of patients with AAP before and after the ED remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to describe adult patients presenting to the ED with AAP and their outpatient care (OC) use before and after the ED. Secondary objectives included description of hospitalization rates, in-hospital mortality, ED re-visits, and exploration of potential risk factors for hospitalization and ED re-visits. For the analysis, we combined routine hospital data from patients who visited 15 EDs in Germany in 2016 with their statutory health insurance OC claims data from 2014 to 2017. Adult patients were included based on a chief complaint or an ED diagnosis indicating unspecific AAP or the Manchester Triage System indicator “Abdominal pain in adults”. Baseline characteristics, ED diagnosis, frequency and reason of hospitalization, frequency and type of prior-OC (prOC) use up to 3 days before and of post-OC use up to 30 days after the ED visit. We identified 28,085 adults aged ≥ 20 years with AAP. 39.8% were hospitalized, 33.9% sought prOC before the ED visit (48.6% of them were hospitalized) and 62.7% sought post-OC up to 30 days after the ED visit. Hospitalization was significantly more likely for elderly patients (aged 65 and above vs. younger; adjusted OR 3.05 [95% CI 2.87; 3.25]), prOC users (1.71 [1.61; 1.90]) and men (1.44 [1.37; 1.52]). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.1% overall. Re-visiting the ED within 30 days was more likely for elderly patients (1.32 [1.13; 1.55) and less likely for those with prOC use (0.37 [0.31; 0.44]). prOC use was associated with more frequent hospitalizations but fewer ED re-visits. ED visits by prOC patients without subsequent hospitalization may indicate difficulties of OC resources to meet the complex diagnostic requirements and expectations of this patient population. Fewer ED re-visits in prOC users indicate effective care in this subgroup.","PeriodicalId":501057,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01237-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is a major driver for capacity-use in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide. Yet, the health care utilization of patients with AAP before and after the ED remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to describe adult patients presenting to the ED with AAP and their outpatient care (OC) use before and after the ED. Secondary objectives included description of hospitalization rates, in-hospital mortality, ED re-visits, and exploration of potential risk factors for hospitalization and ED re-visits. For the analysis, we combined routine hospital data from patients who visited 15 EDs in Germany in 2016 with their statutory health insurance OC claims data from 2014 to 2017. Adult patients were included based on a chief complaint or an ED diagnosis indicating unspecific AAP or the Manchester Triage System indicator “Abdominal pain in adults”. Baseline characteristics, ED diagnosis, frequency and reason of hospitalization, frequency and type of prior-OC (prOC) use up to 3 days before and of post-OC use up to 30 days after the ED visit. We identified 28,085 adults aged ≥ 20 years with AAP. 39.8% were hospitalized, 33.9% sought prOC before the ED visit (48.6% of them were hospitalized) and 62.7% sought post-OC up to 30 days after the ED visit. Hospitalization was significantly more likely for elderly patients (aged 65 and above vs. younger; adjusted OR 3.05 [95% CI 2.87; 3.25]), prOC users (1.71 [1.61; 1.90]) and men (1.44 [1.37; 1.52]). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.1% overall. Re-visiting the ED within 30 days was more likely for elderly patients (1.32 [1.13; 1.55) and less likely for those with prOC use (0.37 [0.31; 0.44]). prOC use was associated with more frequent hospitalizations but fewer ED re-visits. ED visits by prOC patients without subsequent hospitalization may indicate difficulties of OC resources to meet the complex diagnostic requirements and expectations of this patient population. Fewer ED re-visits in prOC users indicate effective care in this subgroup.
急性腹痛患者在急诊室就诊前后的医疗利用情况
急性腹痛(AAP)是全球急诊科(ED)容量使用的主要驱动因素。然而,急性腹痛患者在急诊室就诊前后的医疗利用情况仍不清楚。本研究的主要目的是描述因腹痛到急诊科就诊的成年患者及其在急诊科就诊前后的门诊护理(OC)使用情况。次要目标包括描述住院率、院内死亡率、急诊室复诊率,以及探讨住院和急诊室复诊的潜在风险因素。为了进行分析,我们将 2016 年在德国 15 家急诊室就诊的患者的常规医院数据与其 2014 年至 2017 年的法定医疗保险 OC 索赔数据相结合。成人患者的纳入依据是主诉或急诊室诊断为非特异性 AAP 或曼彻斯特分诊系统指标 "成人腹痛"。基线特征、急诊室诊断、住院频率和原因、急诊室就诊前 3 天内事先使用过 OC(prOC)的频率和类型以及急诊室就诊后 30 天内使用过 OC 后的频率和类型。我们确定了 28,085 名年龄≥ 20 岁、患有 AAP 的成年人。39.8%的人住院治疗,33.9%的人在急诊室就诊前寻求 prOC(其中 48.6%的人住院治疗),62.7%的人在急诊室就诊后 30 天内寻求后OC。老年患者(65 岁及以上与年轻患者相比;调整后 OR 值为 3.05 [95% CI 2.87; 3.25])、prOC 使用者(1.71 [1.61; 1.90])和男性(1.44 [1.37; 1.52])更容易住院。总体住院死亡率为 3.1%。老年患者在 30 天内再次到急诊室就诊的可能性更大(1.32 [1.13; 1.55]),而使用 prOC 的患者再次到急诊室就诊的可能性较小(0.37 [0.31; 0.44])。prOC患者在急诊室就诊而没有随后住院,这可能表明OC资源难以满足这类患者复杂的诊断要求和期望。prOC使用者的急诊室复诊次数较少,说明对这一亚群的护理是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信