Why are union members more willing to strike and protest than nonunion members? Evidence from Argentina and Chile

IF 2.2 2区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Pablo Pérez-Ahumada, Charo Astorga-Pinto
{"title":"Why are union members more willing to strike and protest than nonunion members? Evidence from Argentina and Chile","authors":"Pablo Pérez-Ahumada, Charo Astorga-Pinto","doi":"10.1177/00221856241269660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical studies have shown that union members are more likely to participate in collective actions than nonunion members. However, we still know little about the mechanisms that explain why this occurs. In this article, we aim to fill this gap in the literature. Using data from the World Values Survey for Argentina and Chile (2006–2018), we employed the Karlson–Holm–Breen mediation analysis to analyze the degree to which the relationship between union membership and participation in demonstrations and strikes is explained by union members’ higher levels of politicization and stronger left-wing orientation, as hypothesized in previous studies. We found that in the two countries these two mediators explain more than 30% of the relationship between union membership and participation in demonstrations. We also found that these two mediators explain around 20% of the relationship between union membership and strike participation in Argentina, and nearly 40% of such relationship in Chile. At the end of the article, we offer some explanations for these findings and show how they contribute to the literature on trade unions, class politics, and industrial relations.","PeriodicalId":47100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856241269660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empirical studies have shown that union members are more likely to participate in collective actions than nonunion members. However, we still know little about the mechanisms that explain why this occurs. In this article, we aim to fill this gap in the literature. Using data from the World Values Survey for Argentina and Chile (2006–2018), we employed the Karlson–Holm–Breen mediation analysis to analyze the degree to which the relationship between union membership and participation in demonstrations and strikes is explained by union members’ higher levels of politicization and stronger left-wing orientation, as hypothesized in previous studies. We found that in the two countries these two mediators explain more than 30% of the relationship between union membership and participation in demonstrations. We also found that these two mediators explain around 20% of the relationship between union membership and strike participation in Argentina, and nearly 40% of such relationship in Chile. At the end of the article, we offer some explanations for these findings and show how they contribute to the literature on trade unions, class politics, and industrial relations.
为什么工会会员比非工会会员更愿意罢工抗议?阿根廷和智利的证据
经验研究表明,工会会员比非工会会员更有可能参与集体行动。然而,我们对解释这种情况发生的机制仍然知之甚少。本文旨在填补这一文献空白。利用阿根廷和智利的世界价值观调查(2006-2018 年)数据,我们采用卡尔森-霍尔姆-布林中介分析法,分析了工会会员身份与参与示威和罢工之间的关系在多大程度上是由工会会员较高的政治化水平和较强的左翼倾向所解释的,正如以往研究中所假设的那样。我们发现,在这两个国家中,这两个中介因素解释了工会会员资格与参与示威游行之间关系的 30% 以上。我们还发现,在阿根廷,这两个中介因素可以解释约 20% 的工会会员身份与罢工参与之间的关系,而在智利,这两个中介因素可以解释近 40% 的工会会员身份与罢工参与之间的关系。在文章的最后,我们对这些发现做出了一些解释,并说明了这些发现对有关工会、阶级政治和劳资关系的文献的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Relations
Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
21.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Relations takes a broad interdisciplinary approach to the subject of the world of work. It welcomes contributions which examine the way individuals, groups, organisations and institutions shape the employment relationship. The Journal takes the view that comprehensive understanding of industrial relations must take into account economic, political and social influences on the power of capital and labour, and the interactions between employers, workers, their collective organisations and the state.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信