Organic substitution contrasting direct fertilizer reduction increases wheat productivity, soil quality, microbial diversity and network complexity

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Hao He , Mengwen Peng , Zhenan Hou , Junhua Li
{"title":"Organic substitution contrasting direct fertilizer reduction increases wheat productivity, soil quality, microbial diversity and network complexity","authors":"Hao He ,&nbsp;Mengwen Peng ,&nbsp;Zhenan Hou ,&nbsp;Junhua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Excessive use of chemical fertilizers negatively impacts crop productivity and farmland ecosystem, impeding sustainable agricultural progress. Consequently, there is an immediate need for a chemical fertilizer reduction strategy that ensures crop productivity and improves soil quality and the ecological environment of farmland. This study implemented a three-year (2018–2020) field experiment with two chemical fertilizer reduction methods (direct fertilizer reduction and organic substitution) to investigate their effects on wheat productivity, soil quality, heavy metal pollution risk and microbial characteristics. The results showed that organic substitution treatments (OF1, OF2 and OF3) improved most wheat plant (nutrient uptake and yield and its components) and soil properties (soil nutrients and carbon and nitrogen fractions), leading to increased crop productivity index (CPI, by 9.18 %-16.39 % and 14.14 %-23.36 %) and soil quality index (SQI, by 84.67 %-138.86 % and 104.11 %-175.91 %) compared to conventional fertilization (CF) and direct fertilizer reduction treatments (RF1, RF2 and RF3) in 2019 and 2020. Additionally, organic substitution enhanced the diversity and network complexity of bacterial community, while raising the soil pollution index (SPI, by 9.30 %-12.84 % and 12.20 %-18.49 %) without causing soil heavy metal pollution. Thus, it is recommended to adopt organic fertilizer substitution as the primary chemical fertilizer reduction strategy for wheat production. This approach will ensure crop yield, and improve soil quality and microbial characteristics, but its long-term application requires monitoring changes in soil heavy metals. Overall, this study provides guidelines for implementing scientific fertilization in agricultural practices, thus contributing to the health and sustainability of farmland ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 103784"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002608/pdfft?md5=7ec355d342a6fd888b3aea32771806b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424002608-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excessive use of chemical fertilizers negatively impacts crop productivity and farmland ecosystem, impeding sustainable agricultural progress. Consequently, there is an immediate need for a chemical fertilizer reduction strategy that ensures crop productivity and improves soil quality and the ecological environment of farmland. This study implemented a three-year (2018–2020) field experiment with two chemical fertilizer reduction methods (direct fertilizer reduction and organic substitution) to investigate their effects on wheat productivity, soil quality, heavy metal pollution risk and microbial characteristics. The results showed that organic substitution treatments (OF1, OF2 and OF3) improved most wheat plant (nutrient uptake and yield and its components) and soil properties (soil nutrients and carbon and nitrogen fractions), leading to increased crop productivity index (CPI, by 9.18 %-16.39 % and 14.14 %-23.36 %) and soil quality index (SQI, by 84.67 %-138.86 % and 104.11 %-175.91 %) compared to conventional fertilization (CF) and direct fertilizer reduction treatments (RF1, RF2 and RF3) in 2019 and 2020. Additionally, organic substitution enhanced the diversity and network complexity of bacterial community, while raising the soil pollution index (SPI, by 9.30 %-12.84 % and 12.20 %-18.49 %) without causing soil heavy metal pollution. Thus, it is recommended to adopt organic fertilizer substitution as the primary chemical fertilizer reduction strategy for wheat production. This approach will ensure crop yield, and improve soil quality and microbial characteristics, but its long-term application requires monitoring changes in soil heavy metals. Overall, this study provides guidelines for implementing scientific fertilization in agricultural practices, thus contributing to the health and sustainability of farmland ecosystems.

有机替代与直接减少化肥形成鲜明对比,提高了小麦产量、土壤质量、微生物多样性和网络复杂性
化肥的过度使用对作物生产力和农田生态系统产生了负面影响,阻碍了农业的可持续发展。因此,迫切需要一种既能保证作物产量,又能改善土壤质量和农田生态环境的化肥减量策略。本研究实施了为期三年(2018-2020 年)的田间试验,采用两种化肥减量方法(化肥直接减量和有机替代),研究其对小麦产量、土壤质量、重金属污染风险和微生物特性的影响。结果表明,有机替代处理(OF1、OF2 和 OF3)改善了大部分小麦植株(养分吸收和产量及其组分)和土壤性质(土壤养分和碳氮组分),使作物生产力指数(CPI)提高了 9.与常规施肥(CF)和直接减肥处理(RF1、RF2 和 RF3)相比,2019 年和 2020 年的作物生产力指数(CPI,提高了 9.18 %-16.39 % 和 14.14 %-23.36 %)和土壤质量指数(SQI,提高了 84.67 %-138.86 % 和 104.11 %-175.91 %)均有所提高。此外,有机替代提高了细菌群落的多样性和网络复杂性,同时提高了土壤污染指数(SPI,分别为 9.30 %-12.84 % 和 12.20 %-18.49 %),但不会造成土壤重金属污染。因此,建议采用有机肥替代化肥作为小麦生产的主要化肥减量策略。这种方法既能保证作物产量,又能改善土壤质量和微生物特性,但长期应用需要监测土壤重金属的变化。总之,本研究为在农业实践中实施科学施肥提供了指导,从而有助于农田生态系统的健康和可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信