Examining the Role of Community Engagement in Enhancing the Participation of Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Communities in Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials; A Rapid Review

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
Sanaz Dabiri, R. Raman, J. Grooms, D. Molina-Henry
{"title":"Examining the Role of Community Engagement in Enhancing the Participation of Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Communities in Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials; A Rapid Review","authors":"Sanaz Dabiri, R. Raman, J. Grooms, D. Molina-Henry","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2024.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Despite higher dementia prevalence in racial and ethnic minoritized communities, they are underrepresented in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Community-based recruitment strategies are believed to yield positive outcomes in various fields, such as cancer and cardiovascular clinical trials, but their outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) require further study. In this systematic rapid review, we synthesized the available evidence on community-engaged recruitment strategies in enhancing participation in AD/ADRD clinical trials and observational study participation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We searched and identified studies describing a community-based recruitment approach for racial and ethnic minoritized communities across seven databases (Pubmed, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and EMBASE).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Out of 1915 screened studies, 49 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies employed multiple community-based recruitment approaches, including educational presentations, collaborations with community-based faith organizations, community advisory boards, and engagement with local clinics or health professionals. 52% of studies targeted more than one racial and ethnic minoritized population, primarily African Americans and then Hispanic/Latino. Gaps in knowledge about AD/ADRD, its increased risk among minoritized populations, distrust, and stigma were noted as barriers to research participation. Approximately 50% of the studies specified whether they evaluated their recruitment approaches, and in studies where approaches were evaluated, there was substantial heterogeneity in methods utilized.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The quality of available evidence on the use of community-based recruitment approaches to include racial and ethnic minoritized populations in AD/ADRD research, particularly in clinical trials, is limited. Systematic assessment of recruitment strategies is urgently needed to increase the evidence base around community-engaged recruitment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite higher dementia prevalence in racial and ethnic minoritized communities, they are underrepresented in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Community-based recruitment strategies are believed to yield positive outcomes in various fields, such as cancer and cardiovascular clinical trials, but their outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) require further study. In this systematic rapid review, we synthesized the available evidence on community-engaged recruitment strategies in enhancing participation in AD/ADRD clinical trials and observational study participation.

Methods

We searched and identified studies describing a community-based recruitment approach for racial and ethnic minoritized communities across seven databases (Pubmed, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and EMBASE).

Results

Out of 1915 screened studies, 49 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies employed multiple community-based recruitment approaches, including educational presentations, collaborations with community-based faith organizations, community advisory boards, and engagement with local clinics or health professionals. 52% of studies targeted more than one racial and ethnic minoritized population, primarily African Americans and then Hispanic/Latino. Gaps in knowledge about AD/ADRD, its increased risk among minoritized populations, distrust, and stigma were noted as barriers to research participation. Approximately 50% of the studies specified whether they evaluated their recruitment approaches, and in studies where approaches were evaluated, there was substantial heterogeneity in methods utilized.

Conclusion

The quality of available evidence on the use of community-based recruitment approaches to include racial and ethnic minoritized populations in AD/ADRD research, particularly in clinical trials, is limited. Systematic assessment of recruitment strategies is urgently needed to increase the evidence base around community-engaged recruitment approaches.

Abstract Image

研究社区参与在促进少数种族和族裔社区参与阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的作用;快速综述
背景尽管少数种族和族裔社区的痴呆症发病率较高,但他们在阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的代表性却不足。以社区为基础的招募策略被认为在癌症和心血管临床试验等多个领域产生了积极的效果,但其在阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(AD/ADRD)中的效果还需要进一步研究。在这篇系统性的快速综述中,我们综合了社区参与招募策略在提高 AD/ADRD 临床试验参与度和观察性研究参与度方面的现有证据。方法我们在 7 个数据库(Pubmed、OVID MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、CINAHL、PsychINFO、Web of Science 和 EMBASE)中搜索并确定了针对少数种族和族裔社区的社区招募方法的研究。大多数研究采用了多种基于社区的招募方法,包括教育演讲、与社区信仰组织合作、社区咨询委员会以及与当地诊所或医疗专业人员合作。52% 的研究针对一个以上的少数种族和族裔人群,主要是非裔美国人,然后是西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人。人们注意到,对注意力缺失症/注意力缺失性痴呆症的认识不足、其在少数民族人群中的风险增加、不信任和耻辱感是参与研究的障碍。约50%的研究明确说明了他们是否对招募方法进行了评估,而在对招募方法进行评估的研究中,所使用的方法存在很大的不一致性。迫切需要对招募策略进行系统评估,以增加社区参与招募方法的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信