Flood modeling using HEC-RAS 2D and IBER 2D: a comparative study

Water Supply Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.2166/ws.2024.184
Sid Ali Djafri, Sonia Cherhabil, M. A. Hafnaoui, Mohammed Madi
{"title":"Flood modeling using HEC-RAS 2D and IBER 2D: a comparative study","authors":"Sid Ali Djafri, Sonia Cherhabil, M. A. Hafnaoui, Mohammed Madi","doi":"10.2166/ws.2024.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Floods have become a major risk in urban areas. Identifying areas at risk of flooding has become crucial to reducing this risk and protecting lives and property. Various softwares are used to identify areas at risk of flooding. In this work, a comparative study was made between two well-known software in flood modeling, HEC-RAS 2D and IBER 2D. The comparison included water depth, flow velocity, and the extent of the flood risk areas of El Bayadh City in Algeria for the return periods 50, 100, and 1,000 years. Despite the existence of some differences in the results of the water depths and the flow velocities compared, the results showed a good agreement between the two software. The HEC-RAS software gave higher values than the IBER software for three return periods in estimating water depth, and the IBER provided higher values than HEC-RAS in flood velocity estimation. The results of the flooded areas are almost identical, and the relative deviation of the compared areas varies between 1 and 3%. A flood risk map was produced to identify areas most vulnerable to flooding. This map can be used to help mitigate the risk of flooding.","PeriodicalId":23725,"journal":{"name":"Water Supply","volume":"2 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Floods have become a major risk in urban areas. Identifying areas at risk of flooding has become crucial to reducing this risk and protecting lives and property. Various softwares are used to identify areas at risk of flooding. In this work, a comparative study was made between two well-known software in flood modeling, HEC-RAS 2D and IBER 2D. The comparison included water depth, flow velocity, and the extent of the flood risk areas of El Bayadh City in Algeria for the return periods 50, 100, and 1,000 years. Despite the existence of some differences in the results of the water depths and the flow velocities compared, the results showed a good agreement between the two software. The HEC-RAS software gave higher values than the IBER software for three return periods in estimating water depth, and the IBER provided higher values than HEC-RAS in flood velocity estimation. The results of the flooded areas are almost identical, and the relative deviation of the compared areas varies between 1 and 3%. A flood risk map was produced to identify areas most vulnerable to flooding. This map can be used to help mitigate the risk of flooding.
使用 HEC-RAS 2D 和 IBER 2D 进行洪水模拟:比较研究
洪水已成为城市地区的主要风险。识别洪水风险区域对于降低风险、保护生命和财产安全至关重要。有多种软件可用于识别洪水风险区域。在这项工作中,对 HEC-RAS 2D 和 IBER 2D 这两个著名的洪水模型软件进行了比较研究。比较内容包括水深、流速以及阿尔及利亚巴亚德市 50 年、100 年和 1000 年重现期洪水风险区域的范围。尽管水深和流速的比较结果存在一些差异,但两个软件的比较结果显示出很好的一致性。在估算水深时,HEC-RAS 软件在三个重现期给出的数值均高于 IBER 软件;在估算洪水流速时,IBER 软件给出的数值高于 HEC-RAS。洪水淹没区域的结果几乎相同,比较区域的相对偏差在 1 至 3% 之间。我们绘制了洪水风险地图,以确定最易受洪水影响的地区。该地图可用于帮助减轻洪水风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信