A pioneering approach to measure increased resilience to face climate change: insights from the Race to Resilience Campaign

Marco Billi, Roxana Bórquez, Juan Carlos Varela, Paulina Aldunce, Nicolle Aspee, Emilie Beauchamp, Priscilla Berríos, Marcela Cuevas, A. Loboguerrero, Francis Mason, Anand Patwardhan, Maisa Rojas
{"title":"A pioneering approach to measure increased resilience to face climate change: insights from the Race to Resilience Campaign","authors":"Marco Billi, Roxana Bórquez, Juan Carlos Varela, Paulina Aldunce, Nicolle Aspee, Emilie Beauchamp, Priscilla Berríos, Marcela Cuevas, A. Loboguerrero, Francis Mason, Anand Patwardhan, Maisa Rojas","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad6d37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper illustrates a methodology to measure the impact of resilience-building actions on the increased resilience of people and natural systems to face climate change, developed and field-tested around the Race to Resilience Campaign. Despite increasing acknowledgment of the need for robust methodologies and indicators to monitor and evaluate efforts across adaptation planning and implementation, and provide credibility, accountability and transparency to such actions, there is still a lack of sufficiently standardized and agreed upon metrics able to capture the effect of resilience-building actions. The proposal illustrated in this manuscript offers a pioneering approach for high-level tracking, monitoring and evaluation of resilience-building efforts of non-state actors, based on two complementing sets of metrics: depth metrics measure the degree to which an action is generating a change to fundamental conditions which can demonstrably be related to increasing resilience; while magnitude metrics offer a quantification of the beneficiaries that are affected by these changes. Underlying both stand the Resilience Attributes: properties which can be soundly associated with triggering resilience across different systems, and which can then be used to assess increased resilience ‘by proxy’: that is, by seeing how an action sets forth changes in properties commonly associated with resilience. These Attributes were identified based on updated scientific literature and co-construction exercises with global experts. The integration of Depth and Magnitude indices, adjusted by a Confidence Index evaluating data reliability, allows to estimate the overall contribution of a set of actions on increasing resilience against climate challenges. Based on the above, a possible Monitoring & Evaluation cycle is proposed, and an illustration is offered on two case studies from the Race to Resilience campaign. Key strengths, lessons learned and insights are summarized to stimulate the global discussion, in the context of the Global Stocktake and Global Goal on Adaptation.","PeriodicalId":505267,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad6d37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper illustrates a methodology to measure the impact of resilience-building actions on the increased resilience of people and natural systems to face climate change, developed and field-tested around the Race to Resilience Campaign. Despite increasing acknowledgment of the need for robust methodologies and indicators to monitor and evaluate efforts across adaptation planning and implementation, and provide credibility, accountability and transparency to such actions, there is still a lack of sufficiently standardized and agreed upon metrics able to capture the effect of resilience-building actions. The proposal illustrated in this manuscript offers a pioneering approach for high-level tracking, monitoring and evaluation of resilience-building efforts of non-state actors, based on two complementing sets of metrics: depth metrics measure the degree to which an action is generating a change to fundamental conditions which can demonstrably be related to increasing resilience; while magnitude metrics offer a quantification of the beneficiaries that are affected by these changes. Underlying both stand the Resilience Attributes: properties which can be soundly associated with triggering resilience across different systems, and which can then be used to assess increased resilience ‘by proxy’: that is, by seeing how an action sets forth changes in properties commonly associated with resilience. These Attributes were identified based on updated scientific literature and co-construction exercises with global experts. The integration of Depth and Magnitude indices, adjusted by a Confidence Index evaluating data reliability, allows to estimate the overall contribution of a set of actions on increasing resilience against climate challenges. Based on the above, a possible Monitoring & Evaluation cycle is proposed, and an illustration is offered on two case studies from the Race to Resilience campaign. Key strengths, lessons learned and insights are summarized to stimulate the global discussion, in the context of the Global Stocktake and Global Goal on Adaptation.
衡量应对气候变化的复原力提高情况的开创性方法:"争分夺秒提高复原力运动 "的启示
本文阐述了一种方法,用于衡量抗御力建设行动对提高人类和自然系统应对气候变化的抗御力的影响,该方法是围绕 "抗御力竞赛运动 "开发并经过实地测试的。尽管越来越多的人认识到需要强有力的方法和指标来监测和评估适应规划和实施工作,并为这些行动提供可信度、问责制和透明度,但目前仍缺乏充分标准化和一致认可的衡量标准来反映抗灾能力建设行动的效果。本手稿中的建议提供了一种开创性的方法,以两套互补的指标为基础,对非国家行为者的复原力建设工作进行高层次的跟踪、监测和评估:深度指标衡量的是一项行动在多大程度上改变了基本条件,而这些基本条件显然与提高复原力有关;而广度指标则量化了受这些变化影响的受益者。两者的基础都是 "复原力属性":这些属性与触发不同系统的复原力密切相关,可用于 "代理 "评估复原力的提高:即通过观察一项行动如何引发与复原力通常相关的属性的变化。这些属性是根据最新的科学文献以及与全球专家的共建活动确定的。深度指数和幅度指数经评估数据可靠性的置信度指数调整后进行整合,可估算出一系列行动对提高应对气候挑战的复原力的总体贡献。在此基础上,提出了一个可行的监测与评估周期,并以 "抗灾能力竞赛 "活动的两个案例研究为例作了说明。在全球评估和全球适应目标的背景下,总结了主要优势、经验教训和见解,以激发全球讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信