Economic contribution of U.S. aquaculture farms

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Ganesh Kumar, Shraddha Hegde, Jonathan van Senten, C. Engle, Noah C. Boldt, Matthew Parker, K. Quagrainie, Benedict Posadas, Frank Asche, M. Dey, Suja Aarattuthodi, Luke A. Roy, Russell Grice, Quentin Fong, Michael Schwarz
{"title":"Economic contribution of U.S. aquaculture farms","authors":"Ganesh Kumar, Shraddha Hegde, Jonathan van Senten, C. Engle, Noah C. Boldt, Matthew Parker, K. Quagrainie, Benedict Posadas, Frank Asche, M. Dey, Suja Aarattuthodi, Luke A. Roy, Russell Grice, Quentin Fong, Michael Schwarz","doi":"10.1111/jwas.13091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economics is the study of the allocation of scarce resources to meet human wants and needs and has a critical role to play in addressing challenges related to environmental sustainability, community resilience, and food security. In the context of aquaculture, the key to such a discussion is understanding the linkages of aquaculture farming businesses with other economic sectors and how policy decisions that affect aquaculture result in economic ripples throughout local, regional, and national economies. The only previous national estimates of the economic contributions of U.S. aquaculture are nearly 30 years old. The current study was based on comprehensive data from detailed farm‐level surveys (that captured 77% of the total value of U.S. aquaculture) supplemented by information from publications on the remaining aquaculture sectors. The economic contributions measured in this study were limited to those at the farm level and do not include subsequent impacts that occur as farmed products move through processing, distribution, food service, and retail sectors in the U.S. economy. Results showed that U.S. aquaculture farms contributed $4 billion annually and supported more than 22,000 jobs each year. Labor income and value‐added contributions were $1 billion and $3 billion, respectively. Analysis of the linkages of U.S. aquaculture production activities with other economic sectors showed that nearly all (96%) economic sectors were supported to some degree by U.S. aquaculture farms. Foodfish farms generated the greatest contributions, followed by mollusk farms. Freshwater aquaculture farms contributed twice that of the contributions of marine aquaculture because of the greater size of the freshwater aquaculture sector. Growth of both freshwater and marine sectors would increase overall contributions to the economy. Constraints to growth of aquaculture include regulatory barriers that have restricted existing sectors from meeting current demand for their products. The lack of an adequate regulatory framework for offshore marine aquaculture has constrained its growth and development, especially with respect to the rest of the world. Streamlined regulations implemented in a more timely and efficient manner could result in substantially greater economic contributions from existing U.S. aquaculture farms. The total economic impact of U.S. aquaculture production is likely three to four times greater than the farm‐level impacts estimated in this study as a result of impacts that occur as aquaculture products move downstream through various marketing channels. Additional research is needed to measure the impacts of U.S. aquaculture products in the processing, distribution, food service, supermarket, and restaurant levels of the marketing chain to fully capture the total economic contributions from U.S. aquaculture.","PeriodicalId":17284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The World Aquaculture Society","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.13091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economics is the study of the allocation of scarce resources to meet human wants and needs and has a critical role to play in addressing challenges related to environmental sustainability, community resilience, and food security. In the context of aquaculture, the key to such a discussion is understanding the linkages of aquaculture farming businesses with other economic sectors and how policy decisions that affect aquaculture result in economic ripples throughout local, regional, and national economies. The only previous national estimates of the economic contributions of U.S. aquaculture are nearly 30 years old. The current study was based on comprehensive data from detailed farm‐level surveys (that captured 77% of the total value of U.S. aquaculture) supplemented by information from publications on the remaining aquaculture sectors. The economic contributions measured in this study were limited to those at the farm level and do not include subsequent impacts that occur as farmed products move through processing, distribution, food service, and retail sectors in the U.S. economy. Results showed that U.S. aquaculture farms contributed $4 billion annually and supported more than 22,000 jobs each year. Labor income and value‐added contributions were $1 billion and $3 billion, respectively. Analysis of the linkages of U.S. aquaculture production activities with other economic sectors showed that nearly all (96%) economic sectors were supported to some degree by U.S. aquaculture farms. Foodfish farms generated the greatest contributions, followed by mollusk farms. Freshwater aquaculture farms contributed twice that of the contributions of marine aquaculture because of the greater size of the freshwater aquaculture sector. Growth of both freshwater and marine sectors would increase overall contributions to the economy. Constraints to growth of aquaculture include regulatory barriers that have restricted existing sectors from meeting current demand for their products. The lack of an adequate regulatory framework for offshore marine aquaculture has constrained its growth and development, especially with respect to the rest of the world. Streamlined regulations implemented in a more timely and efficient manner could result in substantially greater economic contributions from existing U.S. aquaculture farms. The total economic impact of U.S. aquaculture production is likely three to four times greater than the farm‐level impacts estimated in this study as a result of impacts that occur as aquaculture products move downstream through various marketing channels. Additional research is needed to measure the impacts of U.S. aquaculture products in the processing, distribution, food service, supermarket, and restaurant levels of the marketing chain to fully capture the total economic contributions from U.S. aquaculture.
美国水产养殖场的经济贡献
经济学研究稀缺资源的分配,以满足人类的愿望和需求,在应对与环境可持续性、社区复原力和粮食安全有关的挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。就水产养殖业而言,这种讨论的关键是了解水产养殖业与其他经济部门的联系,以及影响水产养殖业的政策决定如何在地方、区域和国家经济中产生经济涟漪。此前对美国水产养殖业经济贡献的唯一全国性估计已有近30年的历史。目前的研究基于详细的养殖场调查(占美国水产养殖总值的 77%)所获得的综合数据,并辅以出版物中有关其余水产养殖部门的信息。本研究测算的经济贡献仅限于养殖场层面,不包括养殖产品通过美国经济中的加工、分销、食品服务和零售部门所产生的后续影响。结果显示,美国水产养殖场每年贡献 40 亿美元,每年支持 22,000 多个工作岗位。劳动收入和增值贡献分别为 10 亿美元和 30 亿美元。美国水产养殖生产活动与其他经济部门的联系分析表明,几乎所有(96%)经济部门都在一定程度上得到了美国水产养殖场的支持。食用鱼养殖场的贡献最大,其次是软体动物养殖场。淡水养殖场的贡献是海水养殖的两倍,因为淡水养殖业规模更大。淡水和海水领域的增长将增加对经济的总体贡献。制约水产养殖增长的因素包括限制现有行业满足当前产品需求的监管障碍。近海海水养殖缺乏适当的监管框架,限制了其增长和发展,特别是与世界其他地区相比。以更及时、更高效的方式实施简化监管,可使美国现有水产养殖场的经济贡献大幅增加。美国水产养殖生产的总经济影响可能比本研究估计的养殖场影响大三到四倍,这是由于水产养殖产品通过各种营销渠道向下游转移时产生的影响。还需要进行更多的研究来衡量美国水产养殖产品在加工、分销、食品服务、超市和餐馆等营销链层面的影响,以充分了解美国水产养殖的总体经济贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the World Aquaculture Society is an international scientific journal publishing original research on the culture of aquatic plants and animals including: Nutrition; Disease; Genetics and breeding; Physiology; Environmental quality; Culture systems engineering; Husbandry practices; Economics and marketing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信