Pre-emptive Laparoscopic Colostomy Creation in Obstructing Locally Advanced Rectal and Anal Cancer Does Not Delay the Starting of Oncological Treatments

Cancers Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.3390/cancers16162799
Giovanni Taffurelli, I. Montroni, Claudia Dileo, A. Boccaccino, F. Ghignone, D. Zattoni, Giacomo Frascaroli, Giampaolo Ugolini
{"title":"Pre-emptive Laparoscopic Colostomy Creation in Obstructing Locally Advanced Rectal and Anal Cancer Does Not Delay the Starting of Oncological Treatments","authors":"Giovanni Taffurelli, I. Montroni, Claudia Dileo, A. Boccaccino, F. Ghignone, D. Zattoni, Giacomo Frascaroli, Giampaolo Ugolini","doi":"10.3390/cancers16162799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Managing patients with obstructing rectal cancer is challenging due to the risks of gastrointestinal obstruction and perforation. This study evaluates the outcomes of pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy creation in patients with locally advanced rectal and anal cancer to prevent symptoms and facilitate therapy initiation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes patients with locally advanced rectal or anal cancer assessed by our Colorectal Multidisciplinary Team from January 2017 to February 2024. Patients who underwent pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy were compared to a control group of non-obstructing rectal cancer patients who started direct oncological treatment. The primary endpoint was the time from diagnosis to the initiation of oncological treatments. The secondary endpoints were the rate and timing of subsequent radical resection, surgical morbidity and hospital stay. A Weibull regression was used to evaluate the time differences between the groups. Results: There were 37 patients who received pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy, compared to 207 control patients. The mean time from diagnosis to the start of neoadjuvant therapy was 38.3 ± 2.3 days. Despite higher rates of malnutrition and more advanced stages in the colostomy group, no significant differences were observed in the time to start therapy (p = 0.083) or time to radical resection (p = 0.187) between the groups. The laparoscopic procedure showed low rates of postoperative complications and acceptable lengths of stay. Discussion and Conclusions: Pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy is a feasible approach for managing obstructing rectal or anal cancer. Treatment timelines were not extended compared to timelines for non-obstructing cases, despite differences in nutritional status and staging. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and refine treatment protocols for obstructing gastrointestinal malignancies.","PeriodicalId":504676,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16162799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Managing patients with obstructing rectal cancer is challenging due to the risks of gastrointestinal obstruction and perforation. This study evaluates the outcomes of pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy creation in patients with locally advanced rectal and anal cancer to prevent symptoms and facilitate therapy initiation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes patients with locally advanced rectal or anal cancer assessed by our Colorectal Multidisciplinary Team from January 2017 to February 2024. Patients who underwent pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy were compared to a control group of non-obstructing rectal cancer patients who started direct oncological treatment. The primary endpoint was the time from diagnosis to the initiation of oncological treatments. The secondary endpoints were the rate and timing of subsequent radical resection, surgical morbidity and hospital stay. A Weibull regression was used to evaluate the time differences between the groups. Results: There were 37 patients who received pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy, compared to 207 control patients. The mean time from diagnosis to the start of neoadjuvant therapy was 38.3 ± 2.3 days. Despite higher rates of malnutrition and more advanced stages in the colostomy group, no significant differences were observed in the time to start therapy (p = 0.083) or time to radical resection (p = 0.187) between the groups. The laparoscopic procedure showed low rates of postoperative complications and acceptable lengths of stay. Discussion and Conclusions: Pre-emptive laparoscopic colostomy is a feasible approach for managing obstructing rectal or anal cancer. Treatment timelines were not extended compared to timelines for non-obstructing cases, despite differences in nutritional status and staging. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and refine treatment protocols for obstructing gastrointestinal malignancies.
对局部晚期直肠癌和肛门癌患者先行腹腔镜结肠造口术不会推迟肿瘤治疗的开始时间
背景:由于胃肠道梗阻和穿孔的风险,治疗梗阻性直肠癌患者具有挑战性。本研究评估了对局部晚期直肠癌和肛门癌患者先行腹腔镜结肠造口术的效果,以预防症状并促进治疗的开始。方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括 2017 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月期间由我们结直肠多学科团队评估的局部晚期直肠癌或肛门癌患者。接受先期腹腔镜结肠造口术的患者与开始直接接受肿瘤治疗的非梗阻性直肠癌患者对照组进行了比较。主要终点是从诊断到开始肿瘤治疗的时间。次要终点是随后进行根治性切除术的比例和时间、手术发病率和住院时间。采用Weibull回归法评估组间的时间差异。结果37名患者接受了腹腔镜结肠造口术,而对照组患者为207名。从确诊到开始新辅助治疗的平均时间为(38.3 ± 2.3)天。尽管结肠造口术组的营养不良率更高,晚期病例更多,但两组患者开始治疗的时间(p = 0.083)和根治性切除术的时间(p = 0.187)并无明显差异。腹腔镜手术的术后并发症发生率低,住院时间也可接受。讨论与结论:腹腔镜结肠造口术是治疗梗阻性直肠癌或肛门癌的可行方法。尽管营养状况和分期不同,但与非梗阻性病例相比,治疗时间并未延长。要验证这些发现并完善梗阻性胃肠道恶性肿瘤的治疗方案,还需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信