The Essence of The Similarity of The Tax Court's Decision on A Tax Lawsuit Against the Decree on The Application for Reduction/Cancellation of SKP Is Not Correct

Azwar Amiruddin, L. Husen, Muhammad Rinaldy Bima, Kamal Hidjaz
{"title":"The Essence of The Similarity of The Tax Court's Decision on A Tax Lawsuit Against the Decree on The Application for Reduction/Cancellation of SKP Is Not Correct","authors":"Azwar Amiruddin, L. Husen, Muhammad Rinaldy Bima, Kamal Hidjaz","doi":"10.61707/6ga7pk90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax lawsuits allow taxpayers to challenge adverse tax decisions and ensure the protection of rights and fairness. The reform of the tax system from official assessment to self-assessment is regulated by Law Number 6 of 1983 and its amendments, to increase fairness and transparency. Nevertheless, the challenge of legal interpretation remains a major issue. This study explores Article 36 paragraph (1) b of the Tax Law with a hermeneutic approach, which highlights the flexibility of legal interpretation depending on the social, economic, and intentional context of the legislator. The difference in interpretation of the flexible and rigid hermeneutic approach illustrates how legal practitioners and legal dynamics influence the interpretation of the article. The recommendations in the study emphasize the importance of a flexible hermeneutic approach to legal interpretation, by involving legal practitioners to gain diverse perspectives. This is important to ensure policy adaptation in accordance with changes in laws and tax policies.   ","PeriodicalId":508212,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Religion","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61707/6ga7pk90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tax lawsuits allow taxpayers to challenge adverse tax decisions and ensure the protection of rights and fairness. The reform of the tax system from official assessment to self-assessment is regulated by Law Number 6 of 1983 and its amendments, to increase fairness and transparency. Nevertheless, the challenge of legal interpretation remains a major issue. This study explores Article 36 paragraph (1) b of the Tax Law with a hermeneutic approach, which highlights the flexibility of legal interpretation depending on the social, economic, and intentional context of the legislator. The difference in interpretation of the flexible and rigid hermeneutic approach illustrates how legal practitioners and legal dynamics influence the interpretation of the article. The recommendations in the study emphasize the importance of a flexible hermeneutic approach to legal interpretation, by involving legal practitioners to gain diverse perspectives. This is important to ensure policy adaptation in accordance with changes in laws and tax policies.   
税务法院关于对申请减少/取消 SKP 的法令提起税务诉讼的裁决的相似性的实质不正确
税务诉讼允许纳税人对不利的税务决定提出质疑,并确保权利保护和公平性。1983 年第 6 号法律及其修正案规定了从官方评估到自我评估的税制改革,以提高公平性和透明度。然而,法律解释方面的挑战仍然是一个主要问题。本研究采用诠释学方法探讨了《税法》第 36 条第(1)b 款,该条款强调了法律解释的灵活性,这取决于社会、经济和立法者的意图背景。灵活诠释法和僵化诠释法在解释上的差异说明了法律从业人员和法律动态是如何影响条款解释的。研究中的建议强调了灵活诠释法在法律诠释中的重要性,即让法律从业者参与其中,以获得不同的观点。这对于确保根据法律和税收政策的变化进行政策调整非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信