Doctors only blame the patients: a systems analysis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
D. Mathur
{"title":"Doctors only blame the patients: a systems analysis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)","authors":"D. Mathur","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-05-2024-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study is conducted to understand an emerging public health problem in the garb of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) that affects about 6–21% of women in reproductive age from a systems perspective.Design/methodology/approachThe research is conducted in two phases. In phase 1, 15 women suffering from PCOS were interviewed to generate a knowledge map using an interpretive phenomenological research approach. The emerging themes were divided into four categories, namely individual, familial, societal, organizational, medical and systemic. In phase 2, five workshops were conducted with six invited actors to generate a causal loop diagram (CLD) of PCOS. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) are used in this study.FindingsA CLD from an individual's perspective with implications on organizational, societal and system levels.Research limitations/implicationsAwareness of “lifestyle diseases” is increasing, and this research shall help future studies put PCOS in the larger psychosocial context. The geographical location of respondents can be a limitation, as the causal linkages could only be true for the research site.Practical implicationsThe CLD provides a comprehensive understanding of complex emerging phenomenon of PCOS.Social implicationsThe paper draws attention to factors such as frequently changing doctors, withdrawal from work, medication fatigue, inclination to adopt due to infertility, etc.Originality/valueThis is the first such paper laying out the causal relationships between factors at the individual levels and connecting them to societal, organizational and system levels. This mapping can be useful for policymakers and industry leaders to empathize with PCOS sufferers so that their working conditions can be managed better.","PeriodicalId":42859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-05-2024-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study is conducted to understand an emerging public health problem in the garb of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) that affects about 6–21% of women in reproductive age from a systems perspective.Design/methodology/approachThe research is conducted in two phases. In phase 1, 15 women suffering from PCOS were interviewed to generate a knowledge map using an interpretive phenomenological research approach. The emerging themes were divided into four categories, namely individual, familial, societal, organizational, medical and systemic. In phase 2, five workshops were conducted with six invited actors to generate a causal loop diagram (CLD) of PCOS. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) are used in this study.FindingsA CLD from an individual's perspective with implications on organizational, societal and system levels.Research limitations/implicationsAwareness of “lifestyle diseases” is increasing, and this research shall help future studies put PCOS in the larger psychosocial context. The geographical location of respondents can be a limitation, as the causal linkages could only be true for the research site.Practical implicationsThe CLD provides a comprehensive understanding of complex emerging phenomenon of PCOS.Social implicationsThe paper draws attention to factors such as frequently changing doctors, withdrawal from work, medication fatigue, inclination to adopt due to infertility, etc.Originality/valueThis is the first such paper laying out the causal relationships between factors at the individual levels and connecting them to societal, organizational and system levels. This mapping can be useful for policymakers and industry leaders to empathize with PCOS sufferers so that their working conditions can be managed better.
医生只指责患者:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的系统分析
目的本研究旨在从系统的角度了解一个新出现的公共健康问题,即多囊卵巢综合症(PCOS),该疾病影响着约 6% 至 21% 的育龄妇女。在第 1 阶段,对 15 名患有多囊卵巢综合症的妇女进行了访谈,采用解释性现象学研究方法绘制知识地图。新出现的主题分为四类,即个人、家庭、社会、组织、医疗和系统。在第二阶段,与六位受邀参与者举行了五次研讨会,以生成 PCOS 的因果循环图 (CLD)。本研究采用了《定性研究报告标准》(SRQR)。研究结果从个人视角绘制的因果循环图(CLD)对组织、社会和系统层面都有影响。研究局限性/意义人们对 "生活方式病 "的认识正在不断提高,这项研究将有助于未来的研究将多囊卵巢综合症置于更大的社会心理背景中进行研究。受访者的地理位置可能是一个限制因素,因为因果联系可能只适用于研究地点。社会影响本文提请人们注意频繁更换医生、退出工作、药物疲劳、因不孕而倾向于领养等因素。原创性/价值这是第一篇此类论文,它阐述了个人层面各因素之间的因果关系,并将其与社会、组织和系统层面联系起来。该图谱有助于政策制定者和行业领导者对多囊卵巢综合症患者产生共鸣,从而更好地管理他们的工作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Governance
International Journal of Health Governance HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Governance (IJHG) is oriented to serve those at the policy and governance levels within government, healthcare systems or healthcare organizations. It bridges the academic, public and private sectors, presenting case studies, research papers, reviews and viewpoints to provide an understanding of health governance that is both practical and actionable for practitioners, managers and policy makers. Policy and governance to promote, maintain or restore health extends beyond the clinical care aspect alone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信