The influence of oblique sutures and tendon-suture anchorages on tensile resistance and ultimate strength of 4-strand tendon repairs.

Si Wei Xu, Li Han Sun, Ya Fang Wu
{"title":"The influence of oblique sutures and tendon-suture anchorages on tensile resistance and ultimate strength of 4-strand tendon repairs.","authors":"Si Wei Xu, Li Han Sun, Ya Fang Wu","doi":"10.1177/17531934241259348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated whether the integration of the oblique sutures contributes to the resistance to gapping in 4-strand flexor tendon repairs. In 72 porcine tendons, we compared repairs incorporating oblique sutures against those without using three distinct anchorage types. The studied suture configurations were longitudinal and oblique, modified Savage and Adelaide, and modified Kessler and Lahey. The number of tendons that formed the first gap or a 2 mm gap at the repair site during cyclic loading, stiffness at the 1st and 20th cycles, gap size between tendon ends and ultimate strength were recorded. No significant differences were found between core sutures with and without oblique sutures except between the modified Savage and Adelaide sutures. The Kessler-type anchorage was inferior in resisting gap formation than simple grasping or cross-locking sutures. We conclude that an oblique suture does not increase the gap resistance of 4-strand tendon repairs when using grasping or Kessler-type anchorages, but it does when using a cross-locking anchorage, such as the Adelaide suture. Simple grasping anchorage is comparable to cross-locking in resisting gap formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"214-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241259348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated whether the integration of the oblique sutures contributes to the resistance to gapping in 4-strand flexor tendon repairs. In 72 porcine tendons, we compared repairs incorporating oblique sutures against those without using three distinct anchorage types. The studied suture configurations were longitudinal and oblique, modified Savage and Adelaide, and modified Kessler and Lahey. The number of tendons that formed the first gap or a 2 mm gap at the repair site during cyclic loading, stiffness at the 1st and 20th cycles, gap size between tendon ends and ultimate strength were recorded. No significant differences were found between core sutures with and without oblique sutures except between the modified Savage and Adelaide sutures. The Kessler-type anchorage was inferior in resisting gap formation than simple grasping or cross-locking sutures. We conclude that an oblique suture does not increase the gap resistance of 4-strand tendon repairs when using grasping or Kessler-type anchorages, but it does when using a cross-locking anchorage, such as the Adelaide suture. Simple grasping anchorage is comparable to cross-locking in resisting gap formation.

斜线缝合和肌腱缝合锚固对 4 股肌腱修复的抗拉强度和极限强度的影响。
本研究探讨了斜缝线的整合是否有助于提高四股屈肌腱修复的抗缝合能力。在 72 头猪肌腱中,我们使用三种不同的锚固类型,比较了有斜缝线和无斜缝线的修复。所研究的缝合配置包括纵向和斜向缝合、改良的萨维奇和阿德莱德缝合以及改良的凯斯勒和拉黑缝合。研究记录了循环加载期间在修复部位形成第一个间隙或 2 毫米间隙的肌腱数量、第 1 个和第 20 个循环时的刚度、肌腱末端之间的间隙大小以及极限强度。除改良萨维奇缝合线和阿德莱德缝合线外,有斜向缝合线和无斜向缝合线的核心缝合线之间没有发现明显差异。Kessler 型锚固在防止间隙形成方面不如简单的抓握或交叉锁定缝合。我们的结论是,在使用抓握式或 Kessler 型锚具时,斜线缝合不会增加 4 股肌腱修复的间隙阻力,但在使用交叉锁定锚具(如阿德莱德缝合线)时,会增加间隙阻力。简单的抓握式锚具在抗间隙形成方面与交叉锁定式锚具相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信