Creating Novel Standards for Datapoints on an Elective Orthopaedic Theatre List Document.

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
M Raad, S Virani, S Vinay, P Housden
{"title":"Creating Novel Standards for Datapoints on an Elective Orthopaedic Theatre List Document.","authors":"M Raad, S Virani, S Vinay, P Housden","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2407.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthopaedic theatre lists are an important tool which must convey essential information to all staff to run an effective and safe theatre list. However, there are no set standards or guidelines on the components of an Orthopaedic theatre list. The objective of this study is to formulate guidelines for elective Orthopaedic theatre lists which improve efficiency and reduce errors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We looked at 326 elective Orthopaedic theatre lists from October to November 2018. Various factors such as: theatre and patient demographics, surgical team, type of anaesthesia, Surgery, acronyms and finally extra information such as allergies. Additionally, a survey was distributed to a variety of theatre staff to understand their requirements from a theatre list. Thereafter, we created a proforma for waiting list coordinators. Subsequently, we re-audited six more weeks of theatre lists (255) from November to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The orthopaedic consultant in charge was noted for 100% of patients compared to 85% previously. There was an improvement in documenting the required anaesthesia such as noting 14.5% required spinal compared to 0.3% previously. Prosthesis/equipment was mentioned for 34% of patients compared to 23%. Fluoroscopy was noted as being required for 25% of patients compared to 11%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We believe standards should be in place in order for us to follow to ensure we carry out safe and efficient Orthopaedic theatre lists, and these standards should entail the parameters we have audited. The 'William Harvey theatre list standard' should be used as a gold standard for all elective Orthopaedic theatre lists.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2407.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic theatre lists are an important tool which must convey essential information to all staff to run an effective and safe theatre list. However, there are no set standards or guidelines on the components of an Orthopaedic theatre list. The objective of this study is to formulate guidelines for elective Orthopaedic theatre lists which improve efficiency and reduce errors.

Materials and methods: We looked at 326 elective Orthopaedic theatre lists from October to November 2018. Various factors such as: theatre and patient demographics, surgical team, type of anaesthesia, Surgery, acronyms and finally extra information such as allergies. Additionally, a survey was distributed to a variety of theatre staff to understand their requirements from a theatre list. Thereafter, we created a proforma for waiting list coordinators. Subsequently, we re-audited six more weeks of theatre lists (255) from November to December 2019.

Results: The orthopaedic consultant in charge was noted for 100% of patients compared to 85% previously. There was an improvement in documenting the required anaesthesia such as noting 14.5% required spinal compared to 0.3% previously. Prosthesis/equipment was mentioned for 34% of patients compared to 23%. Fluoroscopy was noted as being required for 25% of patients compared to 11%.

Conclusion: We believe standards should be in place in order for us to follow to ensure we carry out safe and efficient Orthopaedic theatre lists, and these standards should entail the parameters we have audited. The 'William Harvey theatre list standard' should be used as a gold standard for all elective Orthopaedic theatre lists.

为骨科选修手术室清单文件中的数据点创建新标准。
简介:骨科手术室清单是一种重要的工具,它必须向所有工作人员传达基本信息,以便有效、安全地执行手术室清单。然而,骨科手术室清单的组成部分并没有固定的标准或指南。本研究的目的是为骨科择期手术室清单制定指南,以提高效率并减少错误:我们调查了2018年10月至11月的326份骨科择期手术室清单。各种因素,如:手术室和患者人口统计学、手术团队、麻醉类型、手术、缩写词,最后是过敏等额外信息。此外,我们还向不同的手术室工作人员发放了调查问卷,以了解他们对手术室清单的要求。之后,我们为候诊名单协调员制作了一份表格。随后,我们又重新审核了 2019 年 11 月至 12 月期间的六周(255 人)候诊名单:与之前的 85% 相比,100% 的患者都注明了负责的骨科顾问。在记录所需麻醉方面有所改进,例如记录了14.5%的患者需要脊髓麻醉,而之前仅为0.3%。34%的患者需要假体/设备,而之前只有23%。25%的患者需要进行透视检查,而之前只有11%:我们认为应该制定相关标准,以确保我们执行安全高效的骨科手术清单,这些标准应包含我们审核过的参数。威廉-哈维手术室名单标准 "应作为所有骨科择期手术室名单的黄金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信