Voriconazole-induced central nervous system toxicity: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2391492
Juping Yun, Zihe Wang, Wei Liu
{"title":"Voriconazole-induced central nervous system toxicity: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.","authors":"Juping Yun, Zihe Wang, Wei Liu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2391492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the relationship between voriconazole (VRC) and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity based on the real world data.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The reports of FAERS from January 2004 to March 2022 were included in our study. The CNS toxicity events were identified by using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms. Reporting odds ratios corresponding to 95% confidence intervals were employed to quantify the signals of VRC-associated CNS events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall RORs (95%CI) for psychiatric disorders, nervous system disorders, and eye disorders were 1.84 (1.70, 2.00), 1.09 (1.01, 1.18), and 3.84 (3.48, 4.23), respectively (p < 0.05). The median time to the CNS events of VRC was 1(IQR 0-5) day. Top six signals were macular opacity, chloropsia, scintillating scotoma, toxic optic neuropathy, corneal bleeding, and dyschromatopsia, all of them grouped as eye disorders. Compared with itraconazole, fluconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole, VRC shows significant relationship and higher incidence rate of psychiatric disorders, nervous system disorders, and eye disorders, respectively (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VRC was significantly associated with the CNS toxicity. Dosing adjustment, model-based individualized treatment project, and the therapeutic drug monitoring-guided individualized medication regime could be good strategies for efficacy improvement and the adverse events of reducing of VRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1309-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2391492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between voriconazole (VRC) and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity based on the real world data.

Research design and methods: The reports of FAERS from January 2004 to March 2022 were included in our study. The CNS toxicity events were identified by using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms. Reporting odds ratios corresponding to 95% confidence intervals were employed to quantify the signals of VRC-associated CNS events.

Results: The overall RORs (95%CI) for psychiatric disorders, nervous system disorders, and eye disorders were 1.84 (1.70, 2.00), 1.09 (1.01, 1.18), and 3.84 (3.48, 4.23), respectively (p < 0.05). The median time to the CNS events of VRC was 1(IQR 0-5) day. Top six signals were macular opacity, chloropsia, scintillating scotoma, toxic optic neuropathy, corneal bleeding, and dyschromatopsia, all of them grouped as eye disorders. Compared with itraconazole, fluconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole, VRC shows significant relationship and higher incidence rate of psychiatric disorders, nervous system disorders, and eye disorders, respectively (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: VRC was significantly associated with the CNS toxicity. Dosing adjustment, model-based individualized treatment project, and the therapeutic drug monitoring-guided individualized medication regime could be good strategies for efficacy improvement and the adverse events of reducing of VRC.

伏立康唑诱发的中枢神经系统毒性:基于美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的药物警戒研究。
研究背景本研究旨在根据实际数据评估伏立康唑(Voriconazole,VRC)与中枢神经系统(CNS)毒性之间的关系:我们的研究纳入了2004年1月至2022年3月的FAERS报告。中枢神经系统毒性事件通过使用《监管活动医学词典》中的术语进行识别。采用与95%置信区间相对应的报告几率比来量化VRC相关中枢神经系统事件的信号:结果:精神疾病、神经系统疾病和眼部疾病的总体几率比(95%置信区间)分别为 1.84(1.70,2.00)、1.09(1.01,1.18)和 3.84(3.48,4.23)(P<0.05)。发生 VRC 中枢神经系统事件的中位时间为 1 天(IQR 0-5 天)。前六位信号分别为黄斑翳、氯斑、闪烁性视网膜病变、中毒性视神经病变、角膜出血和色觉障碍,均属于眼部疾病。与伊曲康唑、氟康唑、泊沙康唑和异武康唑相比,VRC 与精神疾病、神经系统疾病和眼部疾病有显著关系,且发病率更高(P<0.05):结论:VRC 与中枢神经系统毒性密切相关。调整剂量、基于模型的个体化治疗项目和治疗药物监测指导下的个体化用药方案可能是提高 VRC 疗效和减少不良反应的良策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信