Machine learning-based integration develops a multiple programmed cell death signature for predicting the clinical outcome and drug sensitivity in colorectal cancer.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Chunhong Li, Yuhua Mao, Yi Liu, Jiahua Hu, Chunchun Su, Haiyin Tan, Xianliang Hou, Minglin Ou
{"title":"Machine learning-based integration develops a multiple programmed cell death signature for predicting the clinical outcome and drug sensitivity in colorectal cancer.","authors":"Chunhong Li, Yuhua Mao, Yi Liu, Jiahua Hu, Chunchun Su, Haiyin Tan, Xianliang Hou, Minglin Ou","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumorigenesis and treatment are closely associated with various programmed cell death (PCD) patterns. However, the coregulatory role of multiple PCD patterns in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unknown. In this study, we developed a multiple PCD index (MPCDI) based on 19 PCD patterns using two machine learning algorithms for risk stratification, prognostic prediction, construction of nomograms, immune cell infiltration analysis, and chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity analysis. As a result, in the TCGA-COAD, GSE17536, and GSE29621 cohorts, the MPCDI can effectively distinguished survival outcomes in CRC patients and served as an independent factor for CRC patients. We then explored the immune infiltration landscape in two groups using the nine algorithms and found more overall immune infiltration in the high-MPCDI group. TIDE scores suggested that the increased immune evasion potential and immune checkpoint inhibition therapy may be less effective in the high-MPCDI group. Immunophenoscores indicated that anti-PD1, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4), and anti-PD1-CTLA4 combination therapies are less effective in the high-MPCDI group. In addition, the high-MPCDI group was more sensitive to AZD1332, Foretinib, and IGF1R_3801, and insensitive to AZD3759, AZD5438, AZD6482, Erlotinib, GSK591, IAP_5620, and Picolinici-acid, which suggests that the MPCDI can guide drug selection for CRC patients. As a new clinical classifier, the MPCDI can more accurately distinguish CRC patients who benefit from immunotherapy and develop personalized treatment strategies for CRC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tumorigenesis and treatment are closely associated with various programmed cell death (PCD) patterns. However, the coregulatory role of multiple PCD patterns in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unknown. In this study, we developed a multiple PCD index (MPCDI) based on 19 PCD patterns using two machine learning algorithms for risk stratification, prognostic prediction, construction of nomograms, immune cell infiltration analysis, and chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity analysis. As a result, in the TCGA-COAD, GSE17536, and GSE29621 cohorts, the MPCDI can effectively distinguished survival outcomes in CRC patients and served as an independent factor for CRC patients. We then explored the immune infiltration landscape in two groups using the nine algorithms and found more overall immune infiltration in the high-MPCDI group. TIDE scores suggested that the increased immune evasion potential and immune checkpoint inhibition therapy may be less effective in the high-MPCDI group. Immunophenoscores indicated that anti-PD1, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4), and anti-PD1-CTLA4 combination therapies are less effective in the high-MPCDI group. In addition, the high-MPCDI group was more sensitive to AZD1332, Foretinib, and IGF1R_3801, and insensitive to AZD3759, AZD5438, AZD6482, Erlotinib, GSK591, IAP_5620, and Picolinici-acid, which suggests that the MPCDI can guide drug selection for CRC patients. As a new clinical classifier, the MPCDI can more accurately distinguish CRC patients who benefit from immunotherapy and develop personalized treatment strategies for CRC patients.

基于机器学习的整合开发出一种多程序细胞死亡特征,用于预测结直肠癌的临床结果和药物敏感性。
肿瘤的发生和治疗与各种程序性细胞死亡(PCD)模式密切相关。然而,多种 PCD 模式在结直肠癌(CRC)中的核心调节作用仍然未知。在本研究中,我们基于 19 种 PCD 模式,利用两种机器学习算法开发了多重 PCD 指数(MPCDI),用于风险分层、预后预测、构建提名图、免疫细胞浸润分析和化疗药物敏感性分析。结果,在 TCGA-COAD、GSE17536 和 GSE29621 队列中,MPCDI 能有效区分 CRC 患者的生存结果,并成为 CRC 患者的独立因素。随后,我们利用这九种算法探讨了两组患者的免疫浸润情况,发现高 MPCDI 组的总体免疫浸润程度更高。TIDE评分表明,高MPCDI组的免疫逃避潜力增加,免疫检查点抑制疗法的效果可能较差。免疫评分表明,抗 PD1、抗细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4(anti-CTLA4)和抗 PD1-CTLA4 联合疗法在高MPCDI 组的疗效较差。此外,高MPCDI组对AZD1332、Foretinib和IGF1R_3801更敏感,而对AZD3759、AZD5438、AZD6482、厄洛替尼、GSK591、IAP_5620和Picolinici-acid不敏感,这表明MPCDI可以指导CRC患者的药物选择。作为一种新的临床分类器,MPCDI能更准确地区分从免疫疗法中获益的CRC患者,并为CRC患者制定个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anti-Cancer Drugs
Anti-Cancer Drugs 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信